A R Sutin1, Y Stephan2, A Terracciano1. 1. Florida State University College of Medicine,Tallahassee, FL,USA. 2. University of Montpellier,Montpellier,France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have found Conscientiousness to be protective against dementia. The purpose of this study is to identify which specific aspects, or facets, of Conscientiousness are most protective against cognitive impairment and whether these associations are moderated by demographic factors and/or genetic risk. METHODS: Health and Retirement Study participants were selected for analysis if they completed the facets of Conscientiousness measure, scored in the range of normal cognitive functioning at the baseline personality assessment, and had at least one follow-up assessment of cognition over the up to 6-year follow-up (N = 11 181). Cox regression was used to test for risk of incident dementia and risk of incident cognitive impairment not dementia (CIND). RESULTS: Over the follow-up, 278 participants developed dementia and 2186 participants developed CIND. The facet of responsibility had the strongest and most consistent association with dementia risk: every standard deviation increase in this facet was associated with a nearly 35% decreased risk of dementia; self-control and industriousness were also protective. Associations were generally similar when controlling for clinical, behavioral, and genetic risk factors. These three facets were also independent predictors of decreased risk of CIND. CONCLUSIONS: The present research indicates that individuals who see themselves as responsible, able to control their behavior, and hard workers are less likely to develop CIND or dementia and that these associations persist after accounting for some common clinical, behavioral, and genetic risk factors.
BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have found Conscientiousness to be protective against dementia. The purpose of this study is to identify which specific aspects, or facets, of Conscientiousness are most protective against cognitive impairment and whether these associations are moderated by demographic factors and/or genetic risk. METHODS: Health and Retirement Study participants were selected for analysis if they completed the facets of Conscientiousness measure, scored in the range of normal cognitive functioning at the baseline personality assessment, and had at least one follow-up assessment of cognition over the up to 6-year follow-up (N = 11 181). Cox regression was used to test for risk of incident dementia and risk of incident cognitive impairment not dementia (CIND). RESULTS: Over the follow-up, 278 participants developed dementia and 2186 participants developed CIND. The facet of responsibility had the strongest and most consistent association with dementia risk: every standard deviation increase in this facet was associated with a nearly 35% decreased risk of dementia; self-control and industriousness were also protective. Associations were generally similar when controlling for clinical, behavioral, and genetic risk factors. These three facets were also independent predictors of decreased risk of CIND. CONCLUSIONS: The present research indicates that individuals who see themselves as responsible, able to control their behavior, and hard workers are less likely to develop CIND or dementia and that these associations persist after accounting for some common clinical, behavioral, and genetic risk factors.
Authors: Serge Gauthier; Barry Reisberg; Michael Zaudig; Ronald C Petersen; Karen Ritchie; Karl Broich; Sylvie Belleville; Henry Brodaty; David Bennett; Howard Chertkow; Jeffrey L Cummings; Mony de Leon; Howard Feldman; Mary Ganguli; Harald Hampel; Philip Scheltens; Mary C Tierney; Peter Whitehouse; Bengt Winblad Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Terrie E Moffitt; Louise Arseneault; Daniel Belsky; Nigel Dickson; Robert J Hancox; Honalee Harrington; Renate Houts; Richie Poulton; Brent W Roberts; Stephen Ross; Malcolm R Sears; W Murray Thomson; Avshalom Caspi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Antonio Terracciano; Diego Iacono; Richard J O'Brien; Juan C Troncoso; Yang An; Angelina R Sutin; Luigi Ferrucci; Alan B Zonderman; Susan M Resnick Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Shumita Roy; Stephanie Ficarro; Paul Duberstein; Benjamin P Chapman; Steven Dubovsky; Margaret Paroski; Kinga Szigeti; Ralph H B Benedict Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: L A Farrer; L A Cupples; J L Haines; B Hyman; W A Kukull; R Mayeux; R H Myers; M A Pericak-Vance; N Risch; C M van Duijn Journal: JAMA Date: 1997 Oct 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Katrin Jekel; Marinella Damian; Carina Wattmo; Lucrezia Hausner; Roger Bullock; Peter J Connelly; Bruno Dubois; Maria Eriksdotter; Michael Ewers; Elmar Graessel; Milica G Kramberger; Emma Law; Patrizia Mecocci; José L Molinuevo; Louise Nygård; Marcel Gm Olde-Rikkert; Jean-Marc Orgogozo; Florence Pasquier; Karine Peres; Eric Salmon; Sietske Am Sikkes; Tomasz Sobow; René Spiegel; Magda Tsolaki; Bengt Winblad; Lutz Frölich Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Angelina R Sutin; Yannick Stephan; Damaris Aschwanden; Martina Luchetti; Jason E Strickhouser; Antonio Terracciano Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2019-04-29
Authors: Angelina R Sutin; Yannick Stephan; Martina Luchetti; Damaris Aschwanden; Amanda A Sesker; Páraic S O'Súilleabháin; Antonio Terracciano Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 10.592