Literature DB >> 28873240

Gastric poorly cohesive carcinoma: a correlative study of mutational signatures and prognostic significance based on histopathological subtypes.

Chae H Kwon1,2, Young K Kim1,2, Sojeong Lee1,2, Ahrong Kim1,2, Hye J Park1,2, Yuri Choi1,2, Yeo J Won1,2, Do Y Park1,2, Gregory Y Lauwers3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Genome-wide next-generation sequencing has revealed several driver mutations and has allowed the establishment of a molecular taxonomy of gastric cancer. However, there are few detailed studies on the mutational spectrum of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma. Thus, this study aim to investigate its mutation profile based on clinicopathological characteristics. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Herein, we analysed the mutational pattern of 77 genes in a cohort of 91 patients with poorly cohesive carcinoma by using targeted sequencing, and evaluated the clinicopathological significance of the various mutations based on histological pattern, either signet ring cell (SRC) or other types of poorly cohesive carcinoma (not otherwise specified) (PCC-NOS). Panels of seven (PIK3CA, CDH1, PTEN, RHOA, HDCA9, KRAS, and ATM), three (PIK3CA, CTNNB1, and KRAS) and two (HDCA9 and IGF1R) genes were associated with a diffuse infiltrative growth pattern, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion, respectively. Furthermore, PDGFRB mutations were associated with a favourable prognosis, whereas MET mutations were associated with a poor prognosis. The PCC-NOS-predominant type was associated with a greater depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and poorer prognosis than the SRC-predominant type. Mutations in TP53, BRAF, PI3CA, SMAD4 and RHOA were associated with PCC-NOS. Interestingly, RHOA-mutated gastric cancers showed a distinct morphology, as they were characterised by a superficial SRC or tubular component and a deep invasive PCC-NOS component with desmoplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our findings demonstrate that gastric poorly cohesive carcinomas show several mutational patterns associated with specific clinicopathological characteristics, and particularly show distinct morphological findings when associated with RHOA mutation.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastric cancer; mutational analysis; poorly cohesive carcinoma; prognosis; targeted sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28873240     DOI: 10.1111/his.13383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  12 in total

1.  Where does signet-ring cell carcinoma come from and where does it go?

Authors:  Tomio Arai
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Potential therapeutic targets discovery by transcriptome analysis of an in vitro human gastric signet ring carcinoma model.

Authors:  Kyoko Yamaguchi; Tomoyasu Yoshihiro; Hiroshi Ariyama; Mamoru Ito; Michitaka Nakano; Yuichiro Semba; Jumpei Nogami; Kenji Tsuchihashi; Takuji Yamauchi; Shohei Ueno; Taichi Isobe; Koji Shindo; Taiki Moriyama; Kenoki Ohuchida; Masafumi Nakamura; Yoshihiro Nagao; Tetsuo Ikeda; Makoto Hashizume; Hiroyuki Konomi; Takehiro Torisu; Takanari Kitazono; Tomohiro Kanayama; Hiroyuki Tomita; Yoshinao Oda; Hitoshi Kusaba; Takahiro Maeda; Koichi Akashi; Eishi Baba
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 7.701

3.  Comparison of Gene Expression Profiles of Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma and Poorly Cohesive Carcinoma in Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Min Kyung Yeo; Sun Hyung Kang; Ku Bean Jeong; Hyun Seok Lee; Hong Jae Jeon; Hyuk Soo Eun; Eaum Seok Lee; Hee Seok Moon; Seok Hyun Kim; Jae Kyu Sung; Byung Seok Lee; Hyun Yong Jeong
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 4.  Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A Exerts Diverse Cellular Effects via Small G Proteins, Rho and Rap.

Authors:  Akio Shimizu; Dimitar P Zankov; Misuzu Kurokawa-Seo; Hisakazu Ogita
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Clinical Outcomes of Metachronous Gastric Cancer after Endoscopic Resection for Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jue Lie Kim; Sang Gyun Kim; Jung Kim; Jae Yong Park; Hyo-Joon Yang; Hyun Ju Kim; Hyunsoo Chung
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 4.519

6.  FGFR2 alteration as a potential therapeutic target in poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Tao Shi; Xuan Wang; Jinwei Hu; Lixia Yu; Qin Liu; Nandie Wu; Baorui Liu; Jia Wei
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  The Value of Whole-Tumor Histogram and Texture Analysis Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion in Differentiating Pathologic Subtypes of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Huan-Huan Li; Bo Sun; Cong Tan; Rong Li; Cai-Xia Fu; Robert Grimm; Hui Zhu; Wei-Jun Peng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Prognosis and Biological Behavior of Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma Better or Worse: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuai Zhao; Ling Lv; Kai Zheng; Yu Tian; Jian-Chun Zheng; Cheng-Gang Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Precancerous lesions of the stomach, gastric cancer and hereditary gastric cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Irene Gullo; Federica Grillo; Luca Mastracci; Alessandro Vanoli; Fatima Carneiro; Luca Saragoni; Francesco Limarzi; Jacopo Ferro; Paola Parente; Matteo Fassan
Journal:  Pathologica       Date:  2020-09

Review 10.  Histological and mutational profile of diffuse gastric cancer: current knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  José Garcia-Pelaez; Rita Barbosa-Matos; Irene Gullo; Fátima Carneiro; Carla Oliveira
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 6.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.