| Literature DB >> 28873007 |
Bhupendra Chaudhary1, Nagendra Singh1, Dhananjay K Pandey1.
Abstract
De novo synthesis of folates in plants is tightly regulated through feedback-regulation of certain pathway catalysts. Recently, we investigated the prospects of incessant production of folates in an evolutionary conjunction, through the overexpression of feedback targeted and evolutionarily conserved heterologous E.coli dihydroneopterin aldolase (EcDHNA) in tobacco. 1 The enhanced production of folates in the transgenic lines was associated with differential allosteric regulatory cavities accessible at EcDHNA surface having critical amino-acid differences as Ile 64 (His_63), Val 70 (Phe_69), His 75 (Arg_78) and Arg 79 (Glu_72). These structural characteristics are indicative of evolutionary signatures of the catalytic feedback-regulation of folate manufacturing. We exploited the biotechnological potential of such allosterically diverged trans-DHNA for improved folate production in plants. Nonetheless, genetic manipulation of single enzymes modulating complex pathways such as folate biosynthesis is often inadequate to achieve desired phenotypes; therefore, multi-gene integration with explicit genic-combination for folate enrichment in plants has also been projected for future folate agri-biofortification schemes.Entities:
Keywords: allosteric regulation; folates; phylogeny; plant bioengineering
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28873007 PMCID: PMC5972932 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2017.1373537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Figure 1.Folic acid biosynthetic pathway in plants illustrating key catalysts involved at different steps. These catalysts are primarily required for the production of pterins and p-ABA in the plant cell. The pterins are produced in the cytoplasm by purine metabolism and carried to mitochondria, whereas the p-ABA branch is initiated in plastids through shikimate pathway and subsequently p-ABA is transported to mitochondria for the production of folic acid in association with pterins. Certain folic acid rate-determining catalysts such as DHNA (folB) and DHPS (folP) are known for the regulation of folic acid production in the cell mainly through potential feedback regulation.
Figure 2.Phylogenetic analysis of DHNA protein sequences of representative bacterial, cyanobacterial and plant species. (A) Unrooted phylogram of DHNA protein sequences of representative bacterial, cyanobacterial and plant species developed using NJ method. The sequences are deduced from KEGG database. The protein sequences are aligned using Phylogeny.fr online tool. Different colour backgrounds highlight distinct clades of plants (both monocots and dicots), bacteria and cyanobacteria. Bacterial representatives exhibited two distinct clades showing more proximity to plant or cyanobacterial species than other bacteria, indicating towards the horizontal evolution of DHNA protein across taxa. In plant clade, monocot plants (highlighted with colored triangle) are aligned with other dicot plant representatives and indicate for the paraphyletic evolution of DHNA protein among plant species. (B) DHNA protein sequence alignment of six diverse species representing bacterial, cyanobacterial and plant (monocot and dicot) representatives. At least thirteen highly conserved amino acid residues were identified and marked with asterisks. Selective conserved residues-Lys98, Try53 and Glu73 (highlighted with red colored box) were considered to be responsible for the catalytic site architecture, and have been previously shown with SDM experiments.
Figure 3.(A) PARS based comparative localization of allosteric regulatory sites on the surfaces of AtDHNA and EcDHNA (most significant predicted sites are shown in red; least significant predicted sites are shown in yellow/cyan). (B) The panel highlights the molecular surface representations for the allosteric sites (marked in blue) in the AtDHNA (green) and EcDHNA (pink) protein structures. (C) Superimposition of the crystal structures of AtDHNA (green) and EcDHNA (pink) proteins, showing difference in the predicted allosteric sites. (D) Amino acid sequence comparison of the predicted allosteric site (64-79) on AtDHNA (PDB ID:1SQL) with the corresponding region (64-79) of EcDHNA (PDB ID:2O90).