Literature DB >> 28872528

Quantitative Measurement of Osseous Pathology in Advanced Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis.

Joseph P Iannotti1, Bong-Jae Jun, Thomas E Patterson, Eric T Ricchetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint has typical patterns of deformity as described by Walch et al. However, more severe glenoid pathology may be difficult to classify. The purpose of this study was to use 3-dimensional computed tomography (3-D CT) imaging analysis to define common pathologic subtypes that can be differentiated from the current Walch classification.
METHODS: We performed quantitative measurements of premorbid and pathologic anatomy using preoperative 3-D CT scans from 155 cases of advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis that underwent anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. We defined premorbid glenohumeral anatomy on the basis of previously validated methods using 3-D glenoid vault and humeral best-fit circle models including the premorbid glenoid version, joint-line medialization, and humeral-glenoid alignment (HGA). We determined the anatomic features that differentiate new glenoid morphologic subtypes from the existing Walch classification both qualitatively and quantitatively.
RESULTS: We defined 2 new glenoid subtypes (B3 and C2) for which the glenoid pathology and humeral alignment were not defined in the original Walch classification. The B3 glenoid has high pathologic retroversion, normal premorbid version, and acquired central and posterior bone loss that, on average, is greater than that of the B2 glenoid. The C2 glenoid is dysplastic with high pathologic retroversion, high premorbid version, and acquired posterior bone loss, giving it the appearance of a biconcave glenoid with posterior translation of the humeral head. This C2 glenoid can be confused with the B2 glenoid.
CONCLUSIONS: The B3 and C2 patterns have qualitative and quantitative differences that may result in different clinical outcomes than classic B2 or C types; therefore, our findings suggest that these new subtypes should be included in a new or modified classification system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28872528     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  12 in total

Review 1.  [3D printing in the field of shoulder surgery].

Authors:  Nael Hawi; Nico Bruns; S Razaeian; J D Clausen; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Imaging of the B2 Glenoid: An Assessment of Glenoid Wear.

Authors:  Jared M Mahylis; Vahid Entezari; Bong-Jae Jun; Joseph P Iannotti; Eric T Ricchetti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2019-07-09

3.  Is there a correlation between humeral osteoarthritis and glenoid morphology according to Walch?

Authors:  Philipp Vetter; Petra Magosch; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-06

4.  Walch B2 glenoids: 2-dimensional vs 3-dimensional comparison of humeral head subluxation and glenoid retroversion.

Authors:  Lionel Neyton; Falk Gröger; Simon Rattier; Yoshihiro Hirakawa
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-11

5.  Humeral Bone Loss in Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: the Proximal Humeral Arthroplasty Revision Osseous inSufficiency (PHAROS) Classification System.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Anthony A Romeo; Gregory P Nicholson; Pascal Boileau; Jay D Keener; James M Gregory; Dane H Salazar; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Relationship Between Glenoid Component Shift and Osteolysis After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis.

Authors:  Eric T Ricchetti; Bong-Jae Jun; Yuxuan Jin; Jason C Ho; Thomas E Patterson; Jarrod E Dalton; Kathleen A Derwin; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.558

7.  Stepped Augmented Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for B2 and B3 Glenoid Pathology: A Study of Early Outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph P Iannotti; Bong-Jae Jun; Kathleen A Derwin; Eric T Ricchetti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 6.558

8.  Use of Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component positioning in shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Villatte; Anne-Sophie Muller; Bruno Pereira; Aurélien Mulliez; Peter Reilly; Roger Emery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Omer Ozel; Robert Hudek; Mohamed S Abdrabou; Birgit S Werner; Frank Gohlke
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Preoperative glenoid considerations for shoulder arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Stephen Gates; Brain Sager; Michael Khazzam
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.