Shao-Ying Chu1, Yi-Hsin Tsai2, Sheng-Huang Xiao3, Sheng-Jean Huang4, Chi-Cheng Yang5. 1. a Division of Clinical Psychology, Master of Behavioral Science, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine , Chang-Gung University , Taoyuan , Taiwan. 2. b Department of Neurosurgery , Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital , New Taipei City , Taiwan. 3. c Taipei City Hospital , Ren-Ai Branch, Taipei , Taiwan. 4. d Taipei City Hospital , Taipei , Taiwan. 5. e Department of Psychology , National Chengchi University , Taipei , Taiwan.
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Although 'return to work' (RTW) has been always emphasized for patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI), methodological drawbacks weakened its representativeness. This study thus aims to evaluate the 'work quality' (WQ) which originated from 'working status' and 'working stability' simultaneously, and to further explore the associations among post-concussion symptoms (PCS), neuropsychological functions and WQ. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A total of 179 participants, which included 132 patients with MTBI and 47 healthy participants, were prospectively recruited. The work quality index (WQI) was developed to evaluate WQ. All patients were evaluated for their PCS, neuropsychological functions and WQ at two weeks post-injury (T1), while PCS and WQ were recorded by one month post-injury (T2). RESULTS: More than half of the patients were not able to retain their pre-injury jobs at T1, while 26% of the patients still failed to regain previous works at T2. Interestingly, WQ was significantly associated with educational levels and physical PCS, such as headache and dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneously considering working status and stability to reveal the quality of RTW is merited. A higher educational level might be a protective factor for successful RTW, and ameliorating physical symptoms is also necessary to get favourable WQ by one month after MTBI.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Although 'return to work' (RTW) has been always emphasized for patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI), methodological drawbacks weakened its representativeness. This study thus aims to evaluate the 'work quality' (WQ) which originated from 'working status' and 'working stability' simultaneously, and to further explore the associations among post-concussion symptoms (PCS), neuropsychological functions and WQ. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A total of 179 participants, which included 132 patients with MTBI and 47 healthy participants, were prospectively recruited. The work quality index (WQI) was developed to evaluate WQ. All patients were evaluated for their PCS, neuropsychological functions and WQ at two weeks post-injury (T1), while PCS and WQ were recorded by one month post-injury (T2). RESULTS: More than half of the patients were not able to retain their pre-injury jobs at T1, while 26% of the patients still failed to regain previous works at T2. Interestingly, WQ was significantly associated with educational levels and physical PCS, such as headache and dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneously considering working status and stability to reveal the quality of RTW is merited. A higher educational level might be a protective factor for successful RTW, and ameliorating physical symptoms is also necessary to get favourable WQ by one month after MTBI.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mild traumatic brain injury; neuropsychological functions; post-concussion symptoms; return to work; working stability; working status
Authors: Dylan Powell; Alan Godfrey; Lucy Parrington; Kody R Campbell; Laurie A King; Sam Stuart Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 5.208
Authors: Aleksandra Karolina Gozt; Sarah Claire Hellewell; Jacinta Thorne; Elizabeth Thomas; Francesca Buhagiar; Shaun Markovic; Anoek Van Houselt; Alexander Ring; Glenn Arendts; Ben Smedley; Sjinene Van Schalkwyk; Philip Brooks; John Iliff; Antonio Celenza; Ashes Mukherjee; Dan Xu; Suzanne Robinson; Stephen Honeybul; Gill Cowen; Melissa Licari; Michael Bynevelt; Carmela F Pestell; Daniel Fatovich; Melinda Fitzgerald Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rebecca M Smith; Natalie Marroney; Jenna Beattie; Abby Newdick; Vassilios Tahtis; Caroline Burgess; Jonathan Marsden; Barry M Seemungal Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2020-09-16
Authors: Ankoor S Shah; Aparna Raghuram; Karampreet Kaur; Sophie Lipson; Talia Shoshany; Rebecca Stevens; Michael O'Brien; David Howell; Katie Fleischman; Danielle Barnack; Heather Molind; Karameh Hawash Kuemmerle; Jacob R Brodsky Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Greg Vanichkachorn; Richard Newcomb; Clayton T Cowl; M Hassan Murad; Laura Breeher; Sara Miller; Michael Trenary; Daniel Neveau; Steven Higgins Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: John K Yue; Ryan Rl Phelps; Debra D Hemmerle; Pavan S Upadhyayula; Ethan A Winkler; Hansen Deng; Diana Chang; Mary J Vassar; Sabrina R Taylor; David M Schnyer; Hester F Lingsma; Ava M Puccio; Esther L Yuh; Pratik Mukherjee; Michael C Huang; Laura B Ngwenya; Alex B Valadka; Amy J Markowitz; David O Okonkwo; Geoffrey T Manley Journal: J Concussion Date: 2021-04-06