Stephanie Markovina1, Fady Youssef2, Amit Roy2, Sonya Aggarwal3, Shariq Khwaja2, Todd DeWees2, Benjamin Tan4, Steven Hunt5, Robert J Myerson2, Daniel T Chang3, Parag J Parikh1, Jeffrey R Olsen6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Siteman Cancer Center, 4921 Parkview Place, St. Louis, Missouri. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 4. Siteman Cancer Center, 4921 Parkview Place, St. Louis, Missouri; Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. 5. Siteman Cancer Center, 4921 Parkview Place, St. Louis, Missouri; Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado. Electronic address: Jeffrey.R.Olsen@ucdenver.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare treatment and toxicity outcomes between a phase 2 institutional trial of near total neoadjuvant therapy (nTNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer and a similar historical control cohort treated at Washington University in St. Louis with the current US standard of care, defined as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), total mesorectal excision (TME), and adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy; to expand the comparison to an additional institution, patients treated with similar NCRT at Stanford University were included. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-nine patients with cT3-4N0-2M0 rectal adenocarcinoma enrolled on the Washington University in St. Louis phase 2 study of nTNT were included for analysis. Patients treated at the same institution with conventional NCRT and adjuvant FOLFOX were matched for exact cTNM stage. Forty-one patients treated with NCRT at Stanford University were included in a second analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to compare local control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 49 and 54 months for nTNT and NCRT, respectively. Pathologic complete response and T-downstaging rates were 28% versus 16% (P=.21) and 75% versus 41% (P<.001) in the nTNT and NCRT cohorts, respectively. Three-year disease-free survival (85% vs 68%, P=.032) was significantly better in the nTNT group. Actuarial 3-year local control (92% vs 96%, P=.36) and overall survival (96% vs 88%, P=.67) were similar. The Stanford cohort had significantly lower clinical stage. After controlling for clinical stage, age, tumor location, institution, and number of chemotherapy cycles, nTNT treatment remained significantly associated with lower risk of recurrence (P=.006). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with nTNT had higher T-downstaging and superior distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival compared with conventional NCRT when matched for tumor location and exact cTNM stage. Near total neoadjuvant therapy remained a significant multivariate predictor for improved outcome when including patients treated with NCRT at another institution. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PURPOSE: To compare treatment and toxicity outcomes between a phase 2 institutional trial of near total neoadjuvant therapy (nTNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer and a similar historical control cohort treated at Washington University in St. Louis with the current US standard of care, defined as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), total mesorectal excision (TME), and adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy; to expand the comparison to an additional institution, patients treated with similar NCRT at Stanford University were included. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-nine patients with cT3-4N0-2M0 rectal adenocarcinoma enrolled on the Washington University in St. Louis phase 2 study of nTNT were included for analysis. Patients treated at the same institution with conventional NCRT and adjuvant FOLFOX were matched for exact cTNM stage. Forty-one patients treated with NCRT at Stanford University were included in a second analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to compare local control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 49 and 54 months for nTNT and NCRT, respectively. Pathologic complete response and T-downstaging rates were 28% versus 16% (P=.21) and 75% versus 41% (P<.001) in the nTNT and NCRT cohorts, respectively. Three-year disease-free survival (85% vs 68%, P=.032) was significantly better in the nTNT group. Actuarial 3-year local control (92% vs 96%, P=.36) and overall survival (96% vs 88%, P=.67) were similar. The Stanford cohort had significantly lower clinical stage. After controlling for clinical stage, age, tumor location, institution, and number of chemotherapy cycles, nTNT treatment remained significantly associated with lower risk of recurrence (P=.006). CONCLUSIONS:Patients treated with nTNT had higher T-downstaging and superior distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival compared with conventional NCRT when matched for tumor location and exact cTNM stage. Near total neoadjuvant therapy remained a significant multivariate predictor for improved outcome when including patients treated with NCRT at another institution. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Michael R Marco; Lihong Zhou; Sujata Patil; Jorge E Marcet; Madhulika G Varma; Samuel Oommen; Peter A Cataldo; Steven R Hunt; Anjali Kumar; Daniel O Herzig; Alessandro Fichera; Blase N Polite; Neil H Hyman; Charles A Ternent; Michael J Stamos; Alessio Pigazzi; David Dietz; Yuliya Yakunina; Raphael Pelossof; Julio Garcia-Aguilar Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Wang Qiaoli; Huang Yongping; Xiong Wei; Xu Guoqiang; Ju Yunhe; Liu Qiuyan; Li Cheng; Guo Mengling; Li Jiayi; Xiong Wei; Yang Yi Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Santiago Avila; George J Chang; N Arvind Dasari; Danyal A Smani; Prajnan Das; Joeseph M Herman; Eugene Koay; Albert Koong; Sunil Krishnan; Bruce D Minsky; Grace L Smith; Cullen Taniguchi; Melissa W Taggart; Harmeet Kaur; Emma B Holliday Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Agastya Patel; Piotr Spychalski; Giulia Corrao; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Robert Glynne-Jones; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Jarek Kobiela Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2021-07-24 Impact factor: 4.311