Literature DB >> 28871887

Residual Cholesteatoma during Second-Look Procedures following Primary Pediatric Endoscopic Ear Surgery.

Michael S Cohen1,2, Razan A Basonbul1,2,3, Elliott D Kozin1,2, Daniel J Lee1,2.   

Abstract

Objectives To determine the rate of residual cholesteatoma during planned second-look procedures in pediatric patients following primary cholesteatoma resection using endoscopic and microscopic operative approaches. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary care center. Subjects and Methods Outcomes from pediatric patients undergoing cholesteatoma surgery from January 2011 through August 2015 were analyzed. Cholesteatoma extent at initial resection was staged, and comparison among endoscopic dissection and microscopic or endoscopic inspection groups was made. Presence of disease at time of planned second look was quantified. Descriptive analysis was performed. Results Fifty-five patients (56 ears) with planned second-look procedures were included and underwent a total of 120 procedures. Median age was 11 years (6.7-13 years). Endoscopes were used for inspection in 25 (39%) primary resections and for dissection in 39 (61%) primary resections. Extent of disease at the time of primary resection was similar among groups (χ2, P = .72). Cases where the endoscope was used for inspection only or not at all during primary resection had a 24% rate of residual cholesteatoma at the time of second look compared with a 23% rate for cases with endoscopic dissection (χ2, P = .93). Rate of mastoidectomy significantly decreased from 63% to 33% over the study period ( P = .04) with similar disease extent ( P = .99). Conclusions Residual cholesteatoma rates during planned second-look procedures were similar between the study groups. Use of the endoscope led to a lower rate of mastoidectomy for cases with similar disease extent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cholesteatoma; endoscopic ear surgery; outcomes; pediatric

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28871887     DOI: 10.1177/0194599817729136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  3 in total

1.  A Novel Surgery Classification for Endoscopic Approaches to Middle Ear Cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Yu Sun; En-Hao Wang; Jin-Tao Yu; Gang Zhong; Li-Xin Zhu; Yi Wang; Niu Xun; Hong Yu; Wen Zhou; Zhen Xie; Kun Zhang; Guo-Run Fan; Yi Zhong; Hong-Jun Xiao; Wei-Jia Kong
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-13

2.  Evaluation of Residual Disease Following Transcanal Totally Endoscopic vs Postauricular Surgery Among Children With Middle Ear and Attic Cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Peter R Dixon; Adrian L James
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Our Experience.

Authors:  Satish Nair; J G Aishwarya
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-08-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.