Mindy Goldman1, Whitney R Steele2, Emanuele Di Angelantonio3, Katja van den Hurk4, Ralph R Vassallo5, Marc Germain6, Sheila F O'Brien1. 1. Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 2. American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland. 3. University of Cambridge, and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Donor Health and Genomics, Cambridge, UK. 4. Sanquin, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 5. Blood Systems, Inc., Scottsdale, Arizona. 6. Héma-Québec, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We compared donor and general population demographics over time to provide insight into current donation patterns and the future adequacy of the blood supply. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Seventeen blood center members of the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative from 12 countries provided the number of donors and people in the general population by demographic category for 2001 and 2011, changes in age criteria, and percentage of first-time donors. We calculated the median age of donors and the general population and determined the percentage of each group in age and sex cohorts. RESULTS: Age criteria vary, with upper limits recently liberalized in several countries. In 2011, the percentage of first-time donors ranged from 10% to 41%. The median age of the donor and general population increased from 2001 to 2011 in most countries, as did the percentage of the general population over 60. The youngest donor cohort is overrepresented to a variable degree; this tendency increased over time. Although still underrepresented, older donors contributed more in 2011. A large middle-aged cohort is aging at a rate exceeding the progression of time, while 25- to 45-year-olds are relatively underrepresented. CONCLUSIONS: All participating countries are experiencing aging of their general population. Donor demographics differ substantially between countries; this can be only partly explained by population demographics and age criteria. Many countries have an aging middle-aged donor and population cohort and are increasingly relying on their youngest donors to contribute disproportionately to the blood supply.
BACKGROUND: We compared donor and general population demographics over time to provide insight into current donation patterns and the future adequacy of the blood supply. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Seventeen blood center members of the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative from 12 countries provided the number of donors and people in the general population by demographic category for 2001 and 2011, changes in age criteria, and percentage of first-time donors. We calculated the median age of donors and the general population and determined the percentage of each group in age and sex cohorts. RESULTS: Age criteria vary, with upper limits recently liberalized in several countries. In 2011, the percentage of first-time donors ranged from 10% to 41%. The median age of the donor and general population increased from 2001 to 2011 in most countries, as did the percentage of the general population over 60. The youngest donor cohort is overrepresented to a variable degree; this tendency increased over time. Although still underrepresented, older donors contributed more in 2011. A large middle-aged cohort is aging at a rate exceeding the progression of time, while 25- to 45-year-olds are relatively underrepresented. CONCLUSIONS: All participating countries are experiencing aging of their general population. Donor demographics differ substantially between countries; this can be only partly explained by population demographics and age criteria. Many countries have an aging middle-aged donor and population cohort and are increasingly relying on their youngest donors to contribute disproportionately to the blood supply.
Authors: Eshan U Patel; Jodie L White; Evan M Bloch; Mary K Grabowski; Eric A Gehrie; Parvez M Lokhandwala; Patricia A R Brunker; Ruchika Goel; Beth H Shaz; Paul M Ness; Aaron A R Tobian Journal: Transfusion Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Mohammad Zafrullah; Xiugen Zhang; Coleen Tran; Megan Nguyen; Saleem Kamili; Michael A Purdy; Susan L Stramer Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Bryan R Spencer; Walter Bialkowski; Darryl V Creel; Ritchard G Cable; Joseph E Kiss; Mars Stone; Christopher McClure; Steven Kleinman; Simone A Glynn; Alan E Mast Journal: Transfusion Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Alexandra Tejada-Strop; Mohammad Zafrullah; Saleem Kamili; Susan L Stramer; Michael A Purdy Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Niklas Bobrovitz; Rahul Krishan Arora; Christian Cao; Emily Boucher; Michael Liu; Claire Donnici; Mercedes Yanes-Lane; Mairead Whelan; Sara Perlman-Arrow; Judy Chen; Hannah Rahim; Natasha Ilincic; Mitchell Segal; Nathan Duarte; Jordan Van Wyk; Tingting Yan; Austin Atmaja; Simona Rocco; Abel Joseph; Lucas Penny; David A Clifton; Tyler Williamson; Cedric P Yansouni; Timothy Grant Evans; Jonathan Chevrier; Jesse Papenburg; Matthew P Cheng Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sanjida J Mowla; Mathew R P Sapiano; Jefferson M Jones; James J Berger; Sridhar V Basavaraju Journal: Transfusion Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Marieke Vinkenoog; Katja van den Hurk; Marian van Kraaij; Matthijs van Leeuwen; Mart P Janssen Journal: Transfusion Date: 2020-06-13 Impact factor: 3.157