Arsen Osipov1, Nicholas Nissen2, Joanne Rutgers3, Deepti Dhall3, Jason Naziri4, Shefali Chopra3, Quanlin Li1, Andrew Eugene Hendifar1, Richard Tuli5. 1. Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Richard.Tuli@cshs.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is debate regarding the definition and clinical significance of margin clearance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). A comprehensive archival analysis of surgical resection margins was performed to determine the effect on locoregional recurrence and survival, and the impact of adjuvant therapy in PDA. METHODS: We identified 105 patients with resected PDA. Pancreatic, anterior, bile duct, and posterior surgical resection margins (PM; posterior surface, uncinate and vascular groove) were identified. Three pathologists reviewed all archival surgical specimens and recategorized each margin as tumor at ink/transected, <0.5, 0.5-1, >1-2, or >2 mm from the inked surface. The impact of these and other clinical variables was assessed on local control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among all margins, PM clearance up to 2 mm was prognostic of DFS (p = 0.01) and OS (p = 0.01). Dichotomizing the PM at 2 mm revealed it to be an independent predictor of local recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio HR] 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.048-0.881, p = 0.033), DFS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96, p = 0.03), and OS (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.74, p = 0.008). A margin status of >2 mm was also prognostic of OS in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.89, p = 0.03), however this difference was mitigated in patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.10-1.58, p = 0.19). CONCLUSION: These data highlight the clinical significance of the PM and the lack of significance of other resection margins. Clearance in excess of 2 mm should be considered to improve long-term clinical outcomes. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy should be strongly considered in patients with PMs <2 mm.
PURPOSE: There is debate regarding the definition and clinical significance of margin clearance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). A comprehensive archival analysis of surgical resection margins was performed to determine the effect on locoregional recurrence and survival, and the impact of adjuvant therapy in PDA. METHODS: We identified 105 patients with resected PDA. Pancreatic, anterior, bile duct, and posterior surgical resection margins (PM; posterior surface, uncinate and vascular groove) were identified. Three pathologists reviewed all archival surgical specimens and recategorized each margin as tumor at ink/transected, <0.5, 0.5-1, >1-2, or >2 mm from the inked surface. The impact of these and other clinical variables was assessed on local control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among all margins, PM clearance up to 2 mm was prognostic of DFS (p = 0.01) and OS (p = 0.01). Dichotomizing the PM at 2 mm revealed it to be an independent predictor of local recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio HR] 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.048-0.881, p = 0.033), DFS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96, p = 0.03), and OS (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.74, p = 0.008). A margin status of >2 mm was also prognostic of OS in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.89, p = 0.03), however this difference was mitigated in patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.10-1.58, p = 0.19). CONCLUSION: These data highlight the clinical significance of the PM and the lack of significance of other resection margins. Clearance in excess of 2 mm should be considered to improve long-term clinical outcomes. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy should be strongly considered in patients with PMs <2 mm.
Authors: Asmita Chopra; Mazen Zenati; Melissa E Hogg; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Nathan Bahary; Amer H Zureikat; Joal D Beane Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-05-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Ian R Munhenzva; Connor W Barth; Martha Sibrian-Vazquez; Lei G Wang; Jorge O Escobedo; Summer L Gibbs; Robert M Strongin Journal: Methods Date: 2019-06-08 Impact factor: 3.608
Authors: Vincent P Groot; Georgios Gemenetzis; Alex B Blair; Roberto J Rivero-Soto; Jun Yu; Ammar A Javed; Richard A Burkhart; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; I Quintus Molenaar; John L Cameron; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Steve Walston; Joseph Salloum; Carmine Grieco; Evan Wuthrick; Dayssy A Diaz; Christian Barney; Andrei Manilchuk; Carl Schmidt; Mary Dillhoff; Timothy M Pawlik; Terence M Williams Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Caitlin A McIntyre; Constantinos P Zambirinis; Alessandra Pulvirenti; Joanne F Chou; Mithat Gonen; Vinod P Balachandran; T Peter Kingham; Michael I D'Angelica; Murray F Brennan; Jeffrey A Drebin; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Aaron J Grossberg; Linda C Chu; Christopher R Deig; Eliot K Fishman; William L Hwang; Anirban Maitra; Daniel L Marks; Arnav Mehta; Nima Nabavizadeh; Diane M Simeone; Colin D Weekes; Charles R Thomas Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2020-07-19 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Vincent P Groot; Georgios Gemenetzis; Alex B Blair; Roberto J Rivero-Soto; Jun Yu; Ammar A Javed; Richard A Burkhart; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; I Quintus Molenaar; John L Cameron; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Eddie Zhang; Lora Wang; Talha Shaikh; Elizabeth Handorf; J Karen Wong; John P Hoffman; Sanjay Reddy; Harry S Cooper; Steven J Cohen; Efrat Dotan; Joshua E Meyer Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 5.344