Camille E Short1,2, Charlotte Gelder3,4, Lena Binnewerg5, Megan McIntosh3, Deborah Turnbull3,6. 1. School of Medicine, Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. Camille.Short@adelaide.edu.au. 2. South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Level 7, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia. Camille.Short@adelaide.edu.au. 3. School of Medicine, Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 4. School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 5. School of Psychology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. 6. South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Level 7, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While the internet is considered a promising avenue for providing physical activity support to prostate cancer survivors, little is known about the accessibility of quality websites in the real world. PURPOSE: This work aimed to explore what websites prostate cancer survivors are likely to find when seeking physical activity support online and to evaluate their quality using evidenced-based criteria. METHOD: A search strategy was developed in consultation with prostate cancer survivors (n = 44) to reflect the most common ways they are likely to search the internet. The search was then conducted by a single reviewer, and identified websites were assessed for quality by two reviewers using an evidence-based quality assessment tool developed for this study. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. RESULTS: Of the 45 identified websites, 13 (29%) received a high quality rating, 22 (49%) received a moderate rating and 10 (22%) received a low quality rating. Higher-quality websites tended to have a .org or .gov domain and tended to be located using searches specific to prostate cancer or prostate cancer and exercise. Very few websites contained complete information regarding the physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors, and no websites provided comprehensive behaviour change support. CONCLUSION: There are some good-quality physical activity websites accessible to men with prostate cancer. However, they may be difficult to find and/or require updating to include complete recommendations and more behaviour change support. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Efforts to improve physical activity information online and strategies to direct prostate cancer survivors to higher-quality websites and support services are needed to ensure safety and efficacy.
BACKGROUND: While the internet is considered a promising avenue for providing physical activity support to prostate cancer survivors, little is known about the accessibility of quality websites in the real world. PURPOSE: This work aimed to explore what websites prostate cancer survivors are likely to find when seeking physical activity support online and to evaluate their quality using evidenced-based criteria. METHOD: A search strategy was developed in consultation with prostate cancer survivors (n = 44) to reflect the most common ways they are likely to search the internet. The search was then conducted by a single reviewer, and identified websites were assessed for quality by two reviewers using an evidence-based quality assessment tool developed for this study. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. RESULTS: Of the 45 identified websites, 13 (29%) received a high quality rating, 22 (49%) received a moderate rating and 10 (22%) received a low quality rating. Higher-quality websites tended to have a .org or .gov domain and tended to be located using searches specific to prostate cancer or prostate cancer and exercise. Very few websites contained complete information regarding the physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors, and no websites provided comprehensive behaviour change support. CONCLUSION: There are some good-quality physical activity websites accessible to men with prostate cancer. However, they may be difficult to find and/or require updating to include complete recommendations and more behaviour change support. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Efforts to improve physical activity information online and strategies to direct prostate cancer survivors to higher-quality websites and support services are needed to ensure safety and efficacy.
Authors: Cheryl L Rock; Colleen Doyle; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Kerry S Courneya; Anna L Schwartz; Elisa V Bandera; Kathryn K Hamilton; Barbara Grant; Marji McCullough; Tim Byers; Ted Gansler Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Emily C Martin; Karen Basen-Engquist; Matthew G Cox; Elizabeth J Lyons; Cindy L Carmack; Janice A Blalock; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2016-02-11
Authors: David P Smith; Madeleine T King; Sam Egger; Martin P Berry; Phillip D Stricker; Paul Cozzi; Jeanette Ward; Dianne L O'Connell; Bruce K Armstrong Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-11-27
Authors: Kerri M Winters-Stone; Stacey A Kenfield; Erin L Van Blarigan; Esther L Moe; Justin W Ramsdill; Kimi Daniel; Greta Macaire; Kellie Paich; Elizabeth R Kessler; Omer Kucuk; Theresa W Gillespie; Karen S Lyons; Tomasz M Beer; Jeanette M Broering; Peter R Carroll; June M Chan Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-11-15