Literature DB >> 28871518

Temporal integration of soil N2O fluxes: validation of IPNOA station automatic chamber prototype.

P Laville1, S Bosco2, I Volpi2, G Virgili3, S Neri3, D Continanza3, E Bonari2.   

Abstract

The assessment of nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes from agricultural soil surfaces still poses a major challenge to the scientific community. The evaluations of integrated soil fluxes of N2O are difficult owing to their lower emissions when compared with CO2. These emissions are also sporadic as environmental conditions act as a limiting factor. A station prototype was developed to integrate annual N2O and CO2 emissions using an automatic chamber technique and infrared spectrometers within the LIFE project (IPNOA: LIFE11 ENV/IT/00032). It was installed from June 2014 to October 2015 in an experimental maize field in Tuscany. The detection limits for the fluxes were evaluated up to 1.6 ng N-N2O m2 s-1 and 0.3 μg C-CO2 m2 s-1. A cross-comparison carried out in September 2015 with the "mobile IPNOA prototype"; a high-sensibility transportable instrument already validated provided evidence of very similar values and highlighted flux assessment limitations according to the gas analyzers used. The permanent monitoring device showed that temporal distribution of N2O fluxes can be very large and discontinuous over short periods of less than 10 days and that N2O fluxes were below the detection limit of the instrumentation during approximately 70% of the measurement time. The N2O emission factors were estimated to 1.9% in 2014 and 1.7% in 2015, within the range of IPCC assessments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural managements; Auto-chamber; Laser spectrometry; N-fertilizer; Nitrous oxide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28871518     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-6181-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  6 in total

1.  Automated, low-power chamber system for measuring nitrous oxide emissions.

Authors:  Joel J Fassbinder; Natalie M Schultz; John M Baker; Timothy J Griffis
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

2.  Regression models for calculating gas fluxes measured with a closed chamber.

Authors:  S W Wagner; D C Reicosky; R S Alessi
Journal:  Agron J       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  An estimate of the global sink for nitrous oxide in soils.

Authors:  William H Schlesinger
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Nitrous Oxide Fluxes, Soil Oxygen, and Denitrification Potential of Urine- and Non-Urine-Treated Soil under Different Irrigation Frequencies.

Authors:  Jen Owens; Tim J Clough; Johannes Laubach; John E Hunt; Rodney T Venterea; Rebecca L Phillips
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Neglecting diurnal variations leads to uncertainties in terrestrial nitrous oxide emissions.

Authors:  Narasinha J Shurpali; Üllar Rannik; Simo Jokinen; Saara Lind; Christina Biasi; Ivan Mammarella; Olli Peltola; Mari Pihlatie; Niina Hyvönen; Mari Räty; Sami Haapanala; Mark Zahniser; Perttu Virkajärvi; Timo Vesala; Pertti J Martikainen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls?

Authors:  Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Elizabeth M Baggs; Michael Dannenmann; Ralf Kiese; Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.