Literature DB >> 28871014

Prevalence of stroke and associated risk factors: a population based cross sectional study from northeast China.

Fu-Liang Zhang1, Zhen-Ni Guo2, Yan-Hua Wu3, Hao-Yuan Liu1, Yun Luo1, Ming-Shuo Sun1, Ying-Qi Xing2, Yi Yang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies aimed at stroke and its risk factors can help identify persons at higher risk and therefore promote stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to explore the current prevalence of stroke and its associated risk factors in northeast China.
DESIGN: Population based cross sectional study.
SETTING: Data were collected using a structured precoded questionnaire designed by the Stroke Screening and Prevention Programme of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China, between January and March 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 4100 permanent residents, aged 40 years or older, who had lived in Dehui City of Jilin Province for more than 6 months volunteered to participate in the survey, with a response rate of 92.2%. For the purpose of the present analysis, 48 subjects were excluded due to missing values, giving a total of 4052 people included in this analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The questionnaire included demographic characteristics, stroke related behavioural factors, personal and family medical history of stroke, physical examination and laboratory testing.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of stroke in Jilin Province was 7.2% (95% CI 6.3% to 8.2%). Of all stroke cases, 91.7% (95% CI 87.4% to 94.6%) were ischaemic stroke and 8.3% (95% CI 5.4% to 12.6%) were haemorrhagic stroke. The prevalence rates of dyslipidaemia, smoking and hypertension were ranked as the top three cerebrovascular risk factors and were 62.1%, 61.8% and 57.3%, respectively. We found that hypertension, dyslipidaemia and lack of exercise were associated with ischaemic stroke. However, only hypertension (OR=4.064, 95% CI 1.358 to 12.160) was significantly associated with haemorrhagic stroke.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of stroke, especially ischaemic stroke, and associated cerebrovascular risk factors among adults aged 40 years or older in northeast China were high. A higher regional prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and lack of exercise may be responsible. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Prevalence; Risk factor; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28871014      PMCID: PMC5589000          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


This study was a population based cross sectional study, representing a large sample from northeast China (n=4052). A multistage stratified random cluster method was used in the sampling process and complex weighted computation was used in the data analysis to make the result more reliable. There was an excellent response rate and a low percentage of missing data in general. Limitations of the study were the properties of the cross sectional study and recall bias of the self-reported questionnaire. Another limitation was that the respondents’ atrial fibrillation status was based on self-report and ordinary ECG, which may be underestimated for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Introduction

The latest data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2013 (GBD 2013) ranked cerebrovascular disease as the second largest contributor to death and disability adjusted life years worldwide after ischaemic heart disease.1 2 In the past several decades in developed countries, a greater reduction in the age standardised stroke incidence has taken place because of good health services and effective strategies for cerebrovascular risk factor prevention. However, the converse has been shown for developing countries.3 Despite the advent of reperfusion therapies, such as intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator and endovascular therapy, for selected patients with acute ischaemic stroke,4 there is still a proportion of patients with residual disability or cognitive deficits. Therefore, effective prevention, especially primary prevention, remains the best strategy for reducing the burden of stroke.5 6 Within the global stroke belt, China’s stroke burden mirrors the situation seen in many developing countries.7 According to a report from the WHO, the incidence of stroke in China is still increasing at an annual rate of 8.7%, and has now become the leading cause of death in China.8 9 In Jilin, a province of intermediate economic development located in the central part of northeast China, and within the China stroke belt, the stroke incidence was nearly twice that of other regions.10 However, the most widely cited data on stroke gathered by epidemiological investigation in Jilin Province were collected in the 1980s and 1990s.11–13 The Chinese lifestyle has changed greatly, and the ageing population has increased during the past few decades, which has led to changes in the prevalence of stroke and its associated risk factors. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of stroke and the pattern of its related risk factors in northeast China.

Methods

Study design and participants

This population based cross sectional study was part of the Stroke Screening and Prevention Programme of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China, which was one of the National Key Technology Research and Development Programmes in China (grant No. 2011BAI08B01) and supervised by the Chinese National Centre for Stroke Care Quality Control and Management.14 15 The main aims of the survey were to: (1) obtain updated and reliable data for the incidence, prevalence and mortality of stroke in different regions of China; and (2) access relevant data on stroke, including risk factors, treatment and secondary prevention. Stroke is usually thought of as a disease of the elderly, and the cumulative effects of ageing on the cardiovascular system and the progressive nature of stroke risk factors over a prolonged period substantially increase the risks of both ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage. Because the stroke incidence and prevalence rates showed a steep increase after the age of 39 years,16 the Stroke Screening and Prevention Project Committee, National Health and Family Planning Commission of China, targeted residents aged 40 years or older as the screening population.15 From January to March 2016, we conducted a cross sectional study in Dehui City, which is located in the north central part of Jilin Province. The rationale for this period of time was that our team spent 3 months performing this cross sectional survey. In contrast, the stroke prevalence rate in our survey referred to the lifetime prevalence by the end of 2015, and new onset stroke cases during this 3 month survey were not counted to avoid the influence of seasonal factors on the stroke prevalence. Finally, the reason for choosing January to March was to increase the response rate and reduce sample selection bias, making the study sample representative of adults aged 40 years or older as many migrant workers living in this area would return home for Spring Festival. Multistage stratified random cluster sampling was used to select permanent residents aged 40 years or older who had lived in this area for more than 6 months. In the first stage, 30 villages and 10 towns were selected from 308 villages (rural) and 14 towns (urban), respectively. In the second stage, cluster sampling was used in the selected areas. Respondents were interviewed in person using a structured precoded questionnaire designed by the Stroke Screening and Prevention Programme of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China. The investigators had at least 5 years of education in medicine. They had been uniformly trained and passed the examination at the end of training.

Sampling size

According to the requirements of the Stroke Screening and Prevention Project Committee of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China, screening should cover at least 1% of the local residents aged 40 years or older. There were 335 490 residents aged 40 years or older in Dehui City of Jilin Province, according to the main data bulletin of the sixth national population census in 2010,15 and therefore, the expected sample size was 3355, 1% of the targeted population. The sample size (N) necessary for this cross sectional study was calculated based on a prevalence (p) of stroke of 2.37% among adults aged 40 years or older in China17 with a 0.5% uncertainty level (d), using the formula n=tα2pq/d2 (where t=1.96, α=95% for both sides; q=1- p). Using this equation, we estimated a required sample size of 3556 subjects. Considering an estimated lost to follow-up rate of 20%, the planned sample size was 4445 (3556/0.80). Finally, 4100 permanent residents aged 40 years or older who had lived in Dehui City of Jilin Province for more than 6 months volunteered to participate in the survey, with a response rate of 92.2% (4100/4445). For the purpose of the present analysis, 48 subjects were excluded due to missing values, giving a total of 4052 people included in this analysis.

Data collection and measurement

All data were collected by face to face interviews. The questionnaire included demographic characteristics (eg, gender, age, education level and employment), stroke related behavioural factors (eg, smoking, drinking, exercise habits and diet), personal and family medical history of stroke and chronic diseases (ie, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia and atrial fibrillation), and physical examination and laboratory testing (eg, height, weight, resting blood pressure, fasting blood glucose and lipid, and ECG). Height and weight were measured according to a standardised protocol and technique, with participants wearing no shoes. Blood pressure was measured by trained professionals using an electronic sphygmomanometer (OMRON HEM-7200), and each participant rested for at least 20 min before measurements were taken. Participants were  measured twice, and the average of the readings was taken. Blood samples were drawn from participants’ antecubital veins for measuring fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Blood samples were collected from subjects in the morning after an overnight fast (at least 8 hours) and transported to the same laboratory (Changchun Kingmed Centre for Clinical Laboratory Co Ltd.) under refrigeration, and then stored at −20°C. The laboratory finished the blood examinations within 8 hours after receiving the samples and provided daily quality control charts. All data were double entered and validated. In addition, all participants underwent ECGs for the detection of atrial fibrillation.

Assessment criteria

Stroke’ is defined by the WHO as ‘rapidly developing clinical signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function, with symptoms lasting 24 hours or longer or leading to death, with no apparent cause other than of vascular origin’. Pathological subtypes of stroke included ischaemic stroke and haemorrhagic stroke.18 By definition, silent stroke and transient ischaemic attack were not included. The survey respondents with a history of stroke were asked to provide investigators with their paper based medical records (inpatient or outpatient records), which contained the patient history, physical examination and neurological imaging information, and at least one CT scan at stroke onset, which can accurately identify haemorrhagic stroke from ischaemic stroke. The self-reporting of chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia and atrial fibrillation) was verified by field investigation. Eight stroke related risk factors were defined as follows: hypertension was defined as a self-reported history and/or the use of antihypertensive medication in the past 2 weeks, or the average of two resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) readings of ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mm Hg in the field survey.19 Dyslipidaemia was defined as using an antilipidaemic medication or having one or more of the following in the field survey: TG ≥1.70 mmol/L, TC ≥5.18 mmol/L, HDL-C <1.04 mmol/L and LDL-C ≥3.37 mmol/L.20 Diabetes mellitus was defined as the use of insulin and/or oral hypoglycaemic medications, or a self-reported history of diabetes or FBG ≥7.0 mmol/L in the field survey.21 Atrial fibrillation was defined as reported by the respondent or diagnosed by ECG in the field survey.22 A smoker was defined as someone who reported having smoked one or more cigarettes or was passively exposed to tobacco smoke every day for more than 6 consecutive months. A non-smoker was defined as never having smoked, and never having been passively exposed to tobacco smoke, or had history of smoking but quit smoking for at least 6 consecutive months previous to the study.15 Drinking status was divided into three categories according to the participants’ self-reports in the previous 6 months: non-drinkers, light/moderate drinkers or heavy drinkers, according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) guidelines, advising limits of no more than 3 drinks per day or 7 drinks per week for men and women. These limits are based on a standard drink in the USA (i.e. any drink containing 14 g of pure alcohol). Using the NIAAA as a guideline, the following thresholds were applied: heavier drinkers, in excess of NIAAA limits and light/moderate drinkers, less than or up to the NIAAA limits.23 In addition, we grouped fruit consumption into three categories for our study: ≤2 days per week (≤2 days/week), 3–4 days/week and ≥5 days/week. The weight of consumed fruits should reach or exceed 1 serving per day, with the definition of a serving calculated as 80 g of fruit.24 Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2), and overweight or obesity was defined as BMI ≥26 kg/m2.25 Lack of exercise was defined as physical exercise <3 times a week for <30 min each time, and this included industrial and agricultural labour. A family history of stroke was restricted to immediate family members. Subjects with at least three of the aforementioned eight risk factors or a medical history of stroke were classified as the high risk stroke population. Subjects with fewer than three of these risk factors and with at least one of the three chronic diseases (ie, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation) were classified as the moderate risk stroke population. Subjects with fewer than three of these risk factors but without one of the three chronic diseases (ie, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation) were classified as the low risk stroke population.15 26 The risk assessment scales for stroke referred were put forward by the Stroke Screening and Prevention Project Committee, National Health and Family Planning Commission of China,15 and have been proved to have good reliability and validity compared with the modified scale of the Framingham Stroke Profile (FSP), and can be used as an evaluation tool for stroke risk assessment in Chinese people.27

Statistical methods

Taking into account the study’s complex sampling design, the study data were weighted by gender (men or women), age group (40–49 years, 50–59 years, 60–69 years, 70+ years) and place of residence (rural or urban area) according to the census data from Jilin Provincial Bureau of Statistics, to ensure that the study sample was best representative of the adult population (40+ years of age) in Dehui City of Jilin Province. The study sample was subdivided into 16 subgroups according to the above stratification factors. The formula for calculating the weighted value of each subgroup was as follows: (where = the weighted value of each subgroup; = the constituent ratio of each subgroup in the overall; = the actual sample size of each group; = the actual total sample size). The complex samples function of IBM SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc New York, New York, USA) was used for analysis. Continuous data are presented as means±SD and were compared using the Student’s t test. Categorical variables are presented as proportions and were compared using the Rao-Scott-χ2 test between different subgroups. Estimates of prevalence rate, constituent ratio and their 95% CIs for stroke and risk factors were generated by a range of characteristics, such as age group, gender, place of residence and level of education. Variables that were statistically significant at p<0.1 in the univariate analysis were entered into the multivariate logistic regression analyses (cslogistic command in SPSS) to examine the variables independently associated with ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke.

Results

In total, 4052 participants (mean age 54.85±9.30 years), 1619 men and 2433 women, were involved in the analysis. Nearly half (49.0%) of the participants were from rural areas. Compared with women, men had a higher SBP (142.89 vs 139.77 mm Hg), DBP (92.01 vs 86.62 mm Hg), BMI (24.83 vs 24.23 kg/m2), neck circumference (36.64 vs 32.62 cm), waist circumference (88.23 vs 83.84 cm) and hip circumference (98.87 vs 94.44 cm) (all p<0.001). The laboratory features of the participants by gender are listed in table 1.
Table 1

Anthropometric characteristics of the study sample stratified by gender

CharacteristicAll (n=4052)Men (n=1619)Women (n=2433)tp Value
Age (years)54.85±9.3055.72±9.4354.27±9.174.867<0.001
Residence0.015
 Urban (n (%))2067 (51.0)788 (48.7)1279 (52.6)
 Rural (n (%))1985 (49.0)831 (51.3)1154 (47.4)
Educational level (n (%))0.011
 Primary school and below1446 (35.7)526 (32.5)920 (37.8)
 Junior middle school1696 (41.9)715 (44.2)981 (40.3)
 Senior middle school537 (13.3)222 (13.7)315 (12.9)
 College and above373 (9.2)156 (9.6)217 (8.9)
Blood pressure (mm Hg)
 SBP141.02±21.69142.89±21.12139.77±21.974.533<0.001
 DBP88.78±11.8192.01±11.9686.62±11.2014.414<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)24.47±3.3524.83±3.3424.23±3.335.642<0.001
Neck circumference (cm)34.23±3.2836.64±2.9132.62±2.4145.959<0.001
Waist circumference (cm)85.60±9.2588.23±8.8583.84±9.1015.194<0.001
Hip circumference (cm)96.21±8.5498.87±7.6894.44±8.6317.132<0.001
TG CHOHDLLDL (mmol/L)
 TC (mmol/L)5.40±1.165.32±1.135.45±1.17−3.4830.001
 TG (mmol/L)2.06±1.762.11±1.952.04±1.621.2360.217
 LDL-C (mmol/L)2.14±0.812.13±0.812.14±0.81−0.6370.524
 HDL-C (mmol/L)1.25±0.241.23±0.251.27±0.24−5.15<0.001
FBG (mmol/L)5.32±1.655.28±1.635.35±1.67−1.3920.164

BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Anthropometric characteristics of the study sample stratified by gender BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides. As shown in table 2, the overall prevalence of stroke was 7.2% (95% CI 6.3% to 8.2%). The prevalence of stroke increased with age (p<0.001), but decreased with educational level (p<0.001). It was significantly higher in men than in women (8.8% vs 5.7%, p=0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference between rural and urban residents. Similar to the overall prevalence of stroke, the prevalence of ischaemic stroke also increased with age (p<0.001), but decreased with educational level (p<0.001). In addition, the ischaemic stroke prevalence rate was higher among men than among women (8.2% vs 5.2%, p=0.001), but no statistically significant difference was found between individuals in rural and urban areas.
Table 2

Prevalences of stroke and its subtypes by demographic characteristics

CategorySubcategoryStrokeStroke
Ischaemic strokeHaemorrhagic stroke
7.2 (6.3–8.2)6.7 (5.9–7.7)0.5 (0.3–0.8)
Age (years)40–492.8 (1.8–4.3)2.7 (1.7–4.2)0.1 (0.0–0.7)
50–596.5 (5.2–8.2)5.8 (4.5–7.4)0.7 (0.4–1.5)
60–6913.6 (11.4–16.1)12.6 (10.5–15.0)1.0 (0.5–1.9)
≥7015.9 (11.8–21.1)15.4 (11.4–20.4)0.6 (0.1–3.8)
p value<0.001<0.0010.124
GenderMen8.8 (7.3–10.4)8.2 (6.8–9.8)0.6 (0.3–1.0)
Women5.7 (4.7–6.9)5.2 (4.3–6.4)0.5 (0.2–1.0)
p value0.0010.0010.661
ResidenceUrban6.6 (5.5–7.8)6.2 (5.1–7.4)0.4 (0.2–0.8)
Rural7.5 (6.3–8.7)6.9 (5.8–8.2)0.5 (0.3–1.0)
p value0.3180.3550.691
Educational levelPrimary school and below9.5 (8.0–11.3)8.9 (7.4–10.6)0.6 (0.3–1.2)
Junior middle school5.4 (4.3–6.8)5.0 (3.9–6.3)0.4 (0.2–0.9)
Senior middle school4.9 (3.1–7.5)4.3 (2.7–6.7)0.6 (0.4–3.0)
College and above4.2 (2.5–6.9)3.9 (2.3–6.6)0.3 (0.0–2.0)
p value<0.001<0.0010.861

Data are presented as weighted prevalence (95% CIs).

p values were calculated with the Rao-Scott-χ2 test.

Prevalences of stroke and its subtypes by demographic characteristics Data are presented as weighted prevalence (95% CIs). p values were calculated with the Rao-Scott-χ2 test. As shown in table 3, of all the stroke cases, 91.7% (95% CI 87.4% to 94.6%) were ischaemic stroke and 8.3% (95% CI 5.4% to 12.6%) were haemorrhagic stroke. In addition, the proportions of different types of stroke showed no significant differences by age group, gender, residence or educational level. According to the different stroke risk levels, participants were divided into three groups, with over half (57.3%, 95% CI 55.4% to 59.1%) in the high risk stroke group. The proportions of the different stroke risk populations differed significantly by age group, gender, residence and educational level.
Table 3

Proportions of stroke subtypes and different stroke risk populations by demographic characteristics

CategorySubcategoryStrokep ValueDifferent stroke risk populationp Value
Ischaemic stroke (%)Haemorrhagic stroke (%)High risk stroke population (%)Moderate risk stroke population (%)Low risk stroke population %
91.7 (87.4–94.6)8.3 (5.4–12.6)57.3 (55.4–59.1)12.2 (11.0–13.4)30.6 (28.9–32.3)
Age (years)40–4995.4 (78.8–99.1)4.6 (0.9–21.2)0.55350.1 (46.8–53.4)9.9 (8.1–11.9)40.1 (36.9–43.3)<0.001
50–5988.8 (78.6–94.5)11.2 (5.5–21.4)58.1 (55.1–60.9)12.9 (11.1–15.0)29.0 (26.4–31.8)
60–6990.0 (82.8–94.4)10.0 (5.6–17.2)67.4 (64.2–70.5)13.3 (11.2–15.7)19.3 (16.8–22.1)
≥7094.8 (81.3–98.7)5.2 (1.3–18.7)65.7 (59.4–71.6)17.1 (12.8–22.4)17.2 (12.8–22.7)
GenderMen92.3 (86.8–95.6)7.7 (4.4–13.2)0.66259.5 (56.7–62.3)12.8 (11.1–14.8)27.6 (25.1–30.3)0.003
Women90.7 (82.6–95.2)9.3 (4.8–17.4)55.0 (52.6–57.3)11.5 (10.1–13.1)33.5 (31.3–35.8)
ResidenceUrban91.0 (84.8–94.8)9.0 (5.2–15.2)0.78754.4 (52.2–56.6)14.5 (13.0–16.2)31.0 (29.0–33.1)0.008
Rural91.9 (86.3–95.3)8.1 (4.7–13.7)58.2 (55.9–60.6)11.4 (10.0–13.0)30.4 (28.2–32.6)
Educational levelPrimary school and below91.4 (85.2–95.2)8.6 (4.8–14.8)0.95262.4 (59.5–65.1)11.5 (9.7–13.4)26.7 (24.0–29.6)<0.001
Junior middle school91.7 (85.9–96.4)7.3 (3.6–14.1)52.9 (50.0–55.9)12.2 (10.5–14.2)36.6 (33.5–39.8)
Senior middle school89.9 (54.1–98.5)10.1 (1.5–45.9)53.8 (48.9–58.7)12.6 (9.7–16.1)34.9 (30.1–40.1)
College and above89.4 (64.4–97.5)10.6 (2.5–35.6)48.0 (42.4–53.7)18.0 (13.9–23.0)34.7 (29.6–40.3)

Data are presented as weighted proportion (95% CIs).

p values were calculated with the Rao-Scott-χ2 test.

Proportions of stroke subtypes and different stroke risk populations by demographic characteristics Data are presented as weighted proportion (95% CIs). p values were calculated with the Rao-Scott-χ2 test. Table 4 describes the prevalence of stroke risk factors by demographic characteristics. The prevalence rates of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation increased with age (p<0.001); however, dyslipidaemia was more popular in adults aged 60–69 years (p<0.05). The prevalence rates of other stroke risk factors differed significantly by gender, but not by residence, except for dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking and lack of exercise. In addition, compared with the non-stroke group, we found that subjects with a history of stroke had a higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, lack of exercise and family history of stroke (p<0.001, except p<0.05 for diabetes mellitus and smoking).
Table 4

Prevalences of stroke risk factors by demographic characteristics

CategorySubcategoryHypertensionDyslipidaemiaDiabetes mellitusAtrial fibrillationSmokingOverweight or obesityLack of exerciseFamily history of stroke
Risk factor57.3 (55.5–59.2)62.1 (60.3–63.9)11.2 (10.1–12.4)0.7 (0.5–1.1)61.8 (60.0–63.5)31.0 (29.3–32.8)17.8 (16.5–19.2)33.4 (31.7–35.2)
Age (years)40–4947.1 (43.8–50.4)58.6 (55.3–61.8)7.7 (6.1–9.7)0 (0–0)60.9 (57.7–63.9)33.9 (30.8–37.1)14.0 (12.1–16.1)36.1 (33.0–39.3)
50–5958.6 (55.7–61.5)64.4 (61.4–67.2)11.9 (10.2–14.0)0.7 (0.4–1.5)63.8 (61.0–66.5)30.3 (27.7–33.1)12.8 (11.2–14.7)33.0 (30.3–35.8)
60–6968.5 (65.3–71.6)65.7 (62.4–68.9)14.6 (12.4–17.2)1.2 (0.7–2.2)62.6 (59.4–65.7)31.2 (28.2–34.3)21.9 (19.3–24.7)34.5 (31.4–37.8)
≥7074.1 (68.0–79.3)63.3 (56.8–69.3)16.7 (12.3–22.1)2.8 (1.3–6.1)57.9 (51.6–64.0)22.1 (17.3–27.9)40.1 (34.0–46.6)22.5 (17.7–28.2)
p value<0.0010.014<0.001<0.0010.2430.002<0.001<0.001
GenderMen60.7 (57.8–63.5)61.3 (58.5–64.1)9.8 (8.3–11.6)0.9 (0.5–1.6)70.3 (67.7–72.8)31.9 (29.3–34.6)15.7 (13.8–17.7)31.4 (28.8–34.2)
Women53.9 (51.5–56.3)62.9 (60.6–65.2)12.6 (11.0–14.3)0.6 (0.3–1.1)53.2 (50.8–55.5)30.2 (28.1–32.5)20.0 (18.2–21.9)35.4 (33.2–37.7)
p value<0.0010.3830.0220.265<0.0010.3560.0020.028
ResidenceUrban59.2 (57.0–61.4)66.4 (64.2–68.4)9.3 (8.1–10.7)0.5 (0.2–0.9)34.7 (32.5–36.9)32.7 (30.6–34.9)29.7 (27.7–31.8)34.4 (32.3–36.5)
Rural56.7 (54.3–59.0)60.7 (58.3–63.0)11.8 (10.4–13.4)0.8 (0.5–1.4)70.9 (68.7–73.0)30.5 (28.3–32.7)13.8 (12.2–15.5)33.1 (30.9–35.4)
p value0.121<0.0010.0150.137<0.0010.151<0.0010.425
Personal history of strokeYes82.7 (76.8–87.4)73.5 (67.1–79.0)17.5 (13.0–23.1)1.8 (0.6–4.9)68.3 (62.1–73.9)35.4 (29.1–42.1)28.1 (22.5–34.5)44.8 (38.2–51.6)
No55.3 (53.4–57.3)61.2 (59.3–63.1)10.7 (9.6–11.9)0.7 (0.4–1.1)61.3 (59.4–63.1)30.7 (28.9–32.5)17.0 (15.7–18.4)32.5 (30.7–34.4)
p value<0.001<0.0010.0020.0850.0310.165<0.001<0.001
Educational levelPrimary school and below60.7 (57.9–63.5)62.9 (60.0–65.6)12.7 (10.9–14.7)1.0 (0.6–1.7)72.8 (70.2–75.2)30.4 (27.9–33.1)16.6 (14.6–18.8)30.6 (28.0–33.3)
Junior middle school54.0 (51.0–56.9)60.5 (57.5–63.4)10.1 (8.4–12.0)0.6 (0.3–1.2)56.6 (53.6–59.4)31.1 (28.4–33.9)16.3 (14.4–18.4)35.5 (32.7–38.4)
Senior middle school53.9 (48.9–58.8)64.2 (59.3–68.9)11.1 (8.4–14.6)0.3 (0.1–1.1)44.3 (39.3–49.4)33.6 (28.9–38.6)25.5 (21.5–29.9)40.0 (35.3–44.9)
College and above56.5 (51.0–61.8)63.9 (58.5–69.0)5.6 (3.5–8.9)0.3 (0.0–2.0)25.7 (20.9–31.1)32.6 (27.4–38.3)28.7 (24.0–33.9)33.0 (28.1–38.3)
p value0.0010.3910.0080.247<0.0010.681<0.0010.002

Data are presented as weighted prevalence (95% CIs).

p values were calculated with the Rao-Scott-χ2 test.

Prevalences of stroke risk factors by demographic characteristics Data are presented as weighted prevalence (95% CIs). p values were calculated with the Rao-Scott-χ2 test. The multivariable logistic regression model indicated that multiple characteristics were positively associated with ischaemic stroke, including age, gender, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, lack of exercise and family history of stroke. Table 5 shows that the adjusted ORs of age groups 50–59, 60–69 and ≥70 years (vs 40–49 years age group) increased significantly with age (p<0.001), and men were more likely to have ischaemic stroke than women (OR=1.935, 95% CI 1.410 to 2.655). Patients with hypertension (OR=2.582, 95% CI 1.720 to 3.877) or dyslipidaemia (OR=1.513, 95% CI 1.064 to 2.151) were more likely to have ischaemic stroke. The ORs for lack of exercise and family history of ischaemic stroke were 1.446 (95% CI 1.011 to 2.068) and 1.941 (95% CI 1.424 to 2.646), respectively. However, there was no significant difference between participants with different educational levels, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, smoking or frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption. In contrast, as shown in table 6, although the univariate analyses of risk factors showed that haemorrhagic stroke was associated with age, gender, hypertension and a high level of total cholesterol, the multivariate analyses model found that only hypertension (OR=4.064, 95% CI 1.358 to 12.160) was significantly associated with haemorrhagic stroke.
Table 5

Multivariate logistic analysis of the ischaemic stroke risk factors among participants

CategorySubcategoryFully adjusted OR (95% CI)Wald χ2 valuep Value
Age (years)40–491.00 (Referent)13.274<0.001
50–592.198 (1.306 to 3.700)
60–694.245 (2.520 to 7.151)
≥705.252 (2.873 to 9.600)
GenderWomen1.00 (Referent)16.749<0.001
Men1.935 (1.410 to 2.655)
Educational levelCollege and above1.00 (Referent)2.3390.072
Senior middle school0.876 (0.406 to 1.890)
Junior middle school1.063 (0.561 to 2.015)
Primary school and below1.630 (0.823 to 3.227)
Atrial fibrillationNo1.00 (Referent)0.2560.613
Yes1.359 (0.414 to 4.457)
HypertensionNo1.00 (Referent)20.950<0.001
Yes2.582 (1.720 to 3.877)
DyslipidaemiaNo1.00 (Referent)5.3300.021
Yes1.513 (1.064 to 2.151)
Diabetes mellitusNo1.00 (Referent)2.8280.093
Yes1.385 (0.947 to 2.023)
SmokerNo1.00 (Referent)2.4920.115
Yes1.280 (0.942 to 1.738)
Lack of exerciseNo1.00 (Referent)4.0920.043
Yes1.446 (1.011 to 2.068)
Family history of strokeNo1.00 (Referent)17.639<0.001
Yes1.941 (1.424 to 2.646)
Fruit consumption (days/week) ≥51.00 (Referent)2.1770.114
3–40.646 (0.347 to 1.202)
≤21.707 (0.832 to 3.503)
Table 6

Multivariate logistic analysis of the haemorrhagic stroke risk factors among participants

CategorySubcategoryFully adjusted OR (95% CI)Wald χ2 valuep Value
Age (years)40–491.00 (Referent)1.6960.166
50–595.417 (0.869 to 33.768)
60–697.816 (1.266 to 48.240)
≥703.835 (0.296 to 49.762)
GenderWomen1.00 (Referent)0.8190.365
Me1.597 (0.579 to 4.406)
HypertensionNo1.00 (Referent)6.2900.012
Yes4.064 (1.358 to 12.160)
High level of total cholesterolNo1.00 (Referent)2.6740.102
Yes2.232 (0.852 to 5.847)
Multivariate logistic analysis of the ischaemic stroke risk factors among participants Multivariate logistic analysis of the haemorrhagic stroke risk factors among participants

Discussion

In this population based cross sectional study, we have identified a high prevalence of stroke, especially ischaemic stroke, and cerebrovascular associated risk factors among adults aged 40 years or older in northeast China. Also, we found that regions with a higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and lack of exercise were associated with a high prevalence of stroke. The prevalence of stroke in Dehui City of Jilin Province was almost three times more than the nationwide findings.17 The prevalence of stroke increased with age, and this result was consistent with those of other studies.28 China’s rapid economic development in the past three decades has also increased life expectancies, according to the World Bank, and the proportion of elderly people in the population has increased. The effect of population ageing on the prevalence of stroke has become more and more serious. Our study showed that the prevalence of stroke was significantly higher in men than in women, in accordance with past studies.13 28 However, in contrast with a previous study,29 there was no statistically significant difference between rural and urban areas for stroke prevalence, suggesting disparities in residence was in line with rapid economic development. Of all the stroke cases in our survey, 91.7% (95% CI 87.4% to 94.6%) were ischaemic stroke and 8.3% (95% CI 5.4% to 12.6%) were haemorrhagic stroke. The proportion of ischaemic stroke was higher than those reported in developed countries, where ischaemic stroke accounted for approximately 67.3–80.5% of all stroke cases.30 This proportion was also markedly higher than that in three large cities in China in the 1990s.31 These findings were gathered from a prospective register and monitoring, in addition to annual retrospective door to door investigations, which found that cerebral infarction accounted for 43.7–78.9% of the total number of stroke cases. In addition, the proportion of stroke subtypes was quite different from those in Changsha, a city in south central China, where 55.4% of all stroke cases were attributed to intracerebral haemorrhage.32 This may reflect substantial geographic disparities and some underlying differences in dietary preferences and vascular risk factors.10 33 However, this proportion was in accordance with the China Acute Cerebrovascular Events Register’s (CACER-I) study, reporting that ischaemic stroke cases were increasing, whereas intracerebral haemorrhage showed a decreasing trend.34 The decrease in haemorrhagic stroke may be related to the improvement in hypertension control, as approximately 50% of acute haemorrhagic strokes can be attributed to hypertension in the Chinese population.8 In the present population based survey, we found that the prevalence rates of dyslipidaemia, smoking and hypertension were ranked as the top three cerebrovascular risk factors, with rates of 62.1%, 61.8% and 57.3%, respectively. We found that the prevalence of dyslipidaemia was significantly higher than the national levels in a recent cross sectional study.35 Additionally, the prevalence of dyslipidaemia was higher among those in urban compared with rural areas. This result was consistent with the large cross sectional domestic survey conducted from January 2007 to October 2010,35 and another regional study in China.36 This was mainly attributed to the higher total cholesterol intake among urban residents compared with those living in rural areas.37 By contrast, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus was higher among rural than urban residents. This was found from a pooled analysis of 56 eligible studies in China,38 and the reason was further explored in a future study. Also, the prevalence of hypertension in our study was much higher than the nationwide average39 and than that found in some other regional studies,40 41 but close to the recent study in the Sichuan Tibetan population.42 The high prevalence of dyslipidaemia and hypertension might be ascribed to dietary preferences and other lifestyle issues of residents in Jilin Province. The cold weather limits people’s outdoor physical activity during the long winter, consequently increasing the risk of being overweight or obese and the related metabolic abnormalities. The present study also showed that the prevalence of smoking or being passively exposed to tobacco smoke, especially in rural areas, was higher than the rates from the China Global Adults Tobacco Survey in 2010.43 This may be partly attributable to the fact that residents in Dehui City, in general, were undereducated (77.5% of residents had a junior middle school and below educational level, as shown in table 1) and may lack knowledge of smoking hazards. Estimates from the GBD 2013 suggested that approximately 94% of the Chinese burden of stroke is attributable to the combined effects of modifiable risk factors, and that most stroke cases are attributable to behavioural factors (ie, smoking, poor diet and low physical activity) and metabolic factors (ie, high SBP, high BMI, high FPG, high TC),44 and these results were consistent with those of the INTERSTROKE study,45 in which approximately 86% of strokes could be attributed to nine potentially modifiable metabolic and behavioural risk factors. Thus it is of vital importance to promptly identify these modifiable metabolic and behavioural risk factors among residents to lessen the burden of stroke. In the present study, it was shown that hypertension, dyslipidaemia (metabolic risk factors) and lack of exercise (behavioural risk factor) were associated with ischaemic stroke (p<0.05) independently, which was consistent with several previous studies.46–50 Physical inactivity has been proved to be associated with an increased risk of stroke.51 The benefits appear to occur from a variety of types of activity, including leisure time physical activity, occupational activity, such as agricultural work, and walking. In the present study, the prevalence rate of lack of exercise was 17.8% (95% CI 16.5% to 19.2%) in total, and a difference in prevalence between urban and rural areas was noted, with urban being higher than rural areas (29.7% vs 13.8%, p<0.001). This may be attributed to a sedentary lifestyle among urban residents. The protective effect of physical activity may be partly mediated by its role in reducing blood pressure and controlling other risk factors for stroke, such as diabetes and excess body weight.52 53 In addition, age, gender and family history of stroke were also risk factors for ischaemic stroke, which has been widely acknowledged nowadays.54 55 However, only hypertension (OR=4.064, 95% CI 1.358 to 12.160) was significantly associated with haemorrhagic stroke in our survey when using the multivariate logistic regression model. That hypertension is an independent risk factor in the Chinese population has also been revealed in the Sino-MONICA-Beijing Project observational study.8 As far as we know, this was the most recent investigation of stroke and associated risk factors in this region, and it filled the information gap in this field. This cross sectional study involved a large representative sample of the Dehui City population. Strict training was done before the investigation, and we used a unified precoded questionnaire designed by the Stroke Screening and Prevention Programme of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China.14 The data analysis was performed using complex weighted computation. For all the aforementioned reasons, our survey probably provided accurate data on the prevalence of stroke and related risk factors in this region. Some limitations of this study should be noted. Limitations of the study were the properties of the cross sectional study and the recall bias of the self-reported questionnaire. Another limitation was that the respondents’ atrial fibrillation status was based on self-report and ordinary ECG, which may have underestimated paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.56

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have identified a high prevalence of stroke, especially ischaemic stroke, and associated risk factors among adults aged 40 years and older in northeast China. A higher regional prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and lack of exercise (modifiable risk factors) may be responsible, and these factors are appropriate targets for population based stroke prevention. Health policy makers should place more emphasis on the effective prevention and control of stroke and its risk factors.
  50 in total

1.  Incidence and trends of stroke and its subtypes in China: results from three large cities.

Authors:  Bin Jiang; Wen-zhi Wang; Honglei Chen; Zhen Hong; Qi-dong Yang; Sheng-ping Wu; Xiao-li Du; Qiu-ju Bao
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  American Heart Association Prevention Conference. IV. Prevention and Rehabilitation of Stroke. Risk factors.

Authors:  R L Sacco; E J Benjamin; J P Broderick; M Dyken; J D Easton; W M Feinberg; L B Goldstein; P B Gorelick; G Howard; S J Kittner; T A Manolio; J P Whisnant; P A Wolf
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study.

Authors:  Martin J O'Donnell; Denis Xavier; Lisheng Liu; Hongye Zhang; Siu Lim Chin; Purnima Rao-Melacini; Sumathy Rangarajan; Shofiqul Islam; Prem Pais; Matthew J McQueen; Charles Mondo; Albertino Damasceno; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Graeme J Hankey; Antonio L Dans; Khalid Yusoff; Thomas Truelsen; Hans-Christoph Diener; Ralph L Sacco; Danuta Ryglewicz; Anna Czlonkowska; Christian Weimar; Xingyu Wang; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A prospective study of maturity-onset diabetes mellitus and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in women.

Authors:  J E Manson; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett; A S Krolewski; B Rosner; R A Arky; F E Speizer; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-06

5.  Is there a stroke belt in China and why?

Authors:  Gelin Xu; Minmin Ma; Xinfeng Liu; Graeme J Hankey
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Stroke in the People's Republic of China. II. Meta-analysis of hypertension and risk of stroke.

Authors:  J He; M J Klag; Z Wu; P K Whelton
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Authors:  William J Powers; Colin P Derdeyn; José Biller; Christopher S Coffey; Brian L Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; S Claiborne Johnston; Alexander A Khalessi; Chelsea S Kidwell; James F Meschia; Bruce Ovbiagele; Dileep R Yavagal
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 10.170

9.  Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990-2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition.

Authors:  Christopher J L Murray; Ryan M Barber; Kyle J Foreman; Ayse Abbasoglu Ozgoren; Foad Abd-Allah; Semaw F Abera; Victor Aboyans; Jerry P Abraham; Ibrahim Abubakar; Laith J Abu-Raddad; Niveen M Abu-Rmeileh; Tom Achoki; Ilana N Ackerman; Zanfina Ademi; Arsène K Adou; José C Adsuar; Ashkan Afshin; Emilie E Agardh; Sayed Saidul Alam; Deena Alasfoor; Mohammed I Albittar; Miguel A Alegretti; Zewdie A Alemu; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Samia Alhabib; Raghib Ali; François Alla; Peter Allebeck; Mohammad A Almazroa; Ubai Alsharif; Elena Alvarez; Nelson Alvis-Guzman; Azmeraw T Amare; Emmanuel A Ameh; Heresh Amini; Walid Ammar; H Ross Anderson; Benjamin O Anderson; Carl Abelardo T Antonio; Palwasha Anwari; Johan Arnlöv; Valentina S Arsic Arsenijevic; Al Artaman; Rana J Asghar; Reza Assadi; Lydia S Atkins; Marco A Avila; Baffour Awuah; Victoria F Bachman; Alaa Badawi; Maria C Bahit; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Amitava Banerjee; Suzanne L Barker-Collo; Simon Barquera; Lars Barregard; Lope H Barrero; Arindam Basu; Sanjay Basu; Mohammed O Basulaiman; Justin Beardsley; Neeraj Bedi; Ettore Beghi; Tolesa Bekele; Michelle L Bell; Corina Benjet; Derrick A Bennett; Isabela M Bensenor; Habib Benzian; Eduardo Bernabé; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Tariku J Beyene; Neeraj Bhala; Ashish Bhalla; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Kelly Bienhoff; Boris Bikbov; Stan Biryukov; Jed D Blore; Christopher D Blosser; Fiona M Blyth; Megan A Bohensky; Ian W Bolliger; Berrak Bora Başara; Natan M Bornstein; Dipan Bose; Soufiane Boufous; Rupert R A Bourne; Lindsay N Boyers; Michael Brainin; Carol E Brayne; Alexandra Brazinova; Nicholas J K Breitborde; Hermann Brenner; Adam D Briggs; Peter M Brooks; Jonathan C Brown; Traolach S Brugha; Rachelle Buchbinder; Geoffrey C Buckle; Christine M Budke; Anne Bulchis; Andrew G Bulloch; Ismael R Campos-Nonato; Hélène Carabin; Jonathan R Carapetis; Rosario Cárdenas; David O Carpenter; Valeria Caso; Carlos A Castañeda-Orjuela; Ruben E Castro; Ferrán Catalá-López; Fiorella Cavalleri; Alanur Çavlin; Vineet K Chadha; Jung-Chen Chang; Fiona J Charlson; Honglei Chen; Wanqing Chen; Peggy P Chiang; Odgerel Chimed-Ochir; Rajiv Chowdhury; Hanne Christensen; Costas A Christophi; Massimo Cirillo; Matthew M Coates; Luc E Coffeng; Megan S Coggeshall; Valentina Colistro; Samantha M Colquhoun; Graham S Cooke; Cyrus Cooper; Leslie T Cooper; Luis M Coppola; Monica Cortinovis; Michael H Criqui; John A Crump; Lucia Cuevas-Nasu; Hadi Danawi; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Emily Dansereau; Paul I Dargan; Gail Davey; Adrian Davis; Dragos V Davitoiu; Anand Dayama; Diego De Leo; Louisa Degenhardt; Borja Del Pozo-Cruz; Robert P Dellavalle; Kebede Deribe; Sarah Derrett; Don C Des Jarlais; Muluken Dessalegn; Samath D Dharmaratne; Mukesh K Dherani; Cesar Diaz-Torné; Daniel Dicker; Eric L Ding; Klara Dokova; E Ray Dorsey; Tim R Driscoll; Leilei Duan; Herbert C Duber; Beth E Ebel; Karen M Edmond; Yousef M Elshrek; Matthias Endres; Sergey P Ermakov; Holly E Erskine; Babak Eshrati; Alireza Esteghamati; Kara Estep; Emerito Jose A Faraon; Farshad Farzadfar; Derek F Fay; Valery L Feigin; David T Felson; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Jefferson G Fernandes; Alize J Ferrari; Christina Fitzmaurice; Abraham D Flaxman; Thomas D Fleming; Nataliya Foigt; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; F Gerry R Fowkes; Urbano Fra Paleo; Richard C Franklin; Thomas Fürst; Belinda Gabbe; Lynne Gaffikin; Fortuné G Gankpé; Johanna M Geleijnse; Bradford D Gessner; Peter Gething; Katherine B Gibney; Maurice Giroud; Giorgia Giussani; Hector Gomez Dantes; Philimon Gona; Diego González-Medina; Richard A Gosselin; Carolyn C Gotay; Atsushi Goto; Hebe N Gouda; Nicholas Graetz; Harish C Gugnani; Rahul Gupta; Rajeev Gupta; Reyna A Gutiérrez; Juanita Haagsma; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Holly Hagan; Yara A Halasa; Randah R Hamadeh; Hannah Hamavid; Mouhanad Hammami; Jamie Hancock; Graeme J Hankey; Gillian M Hansen; Yuantao Hao; Hilda L Harb; Josep Maria Haro; Rasmus Havmoeller; Simon I Hay; Roderick J Hay; Ileana B Heredia-Pi; Kyle R Heuton; Pouria Heydarpour; Hideki Higashi; Martha Hijar; Hans W Hoek; Howard J Hoffman; H Dean Hosgood; Mazeda Hossain; Peter J Hotez; Damian G Hoy; Mohamed Hsairi; Guoqing Hu; Cheng Huang; John J Huang; Abdullatif Husseini; Chantal Huynh; Marissa L Iannarone; Kim M Iburg; Kaire Innos; Manami Inoue; Farhad Islami; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Deborah L Jarvis; Simerjot K Jassal; Sun Ha Jee; Panniyammakal Jeemon; Paul N Jensen; Vivekanand Jha; Guohong Jiang; Ying Jiang; Jost B Jonas; Knud Juel; Haidong Kan; André Karch; Corine K Karema; Chante Karimkhani; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nicholas J Kassebaum; Anil Kaul; Norito Kawakami; Konstantin Kazanjan; Andrew H Kemp; Andre P Kengne; Andre Keren; Yousef S Khader; Shams Eldin A Khalifa; Ejaz A Khan; Gulfaraz Khan; Young-Ho Khang; Christian Kieling; Daniel Kim; Sungroul Kim; Yunjin Kim; Yohannes Kinfu; Jonas M Kinge; Miia Kivipelto; Luke D Knibbs; Ann Kristin Knudsen; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Soewarta Kosen; Sanjay Krishnaswami; Barthelemy Kuate Defo; Burcu Kucuk Bicer; Ernst J Kuipers; Chanda Kulkarni; Veena S Kulkarni; G Anil Kumar; Hmwe H Kyu; Taavi Lai; Ratilal Lalloo; Tea Lallukka; Hilton Lam; Qing Lan; Van C Lansingh; Anders Larsson; Alicia E B Lawrynowicz; Janet L Leasher; James Leigh; Ricky Leung; Carly E Levitz; Bin Li; Yichong Li; Yongmei Li; Stephen S Lim; Maggie Lind; Steven E Lipshultz; Shiwei Liu; Yang Liu; Belinda K Lloyd; Katherine T Lofgren; Giancarlo Logroscino; Katharine J Looker; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Paulo A Lotufo; Rafael Lozano; Robyn M Lucas; Raimundas Lunevicius; Ronan A Lyons; Stefan Ma; Michael F Macintyre; Mark T Mackay; Marek Majdan; Reza Malekzadeh; Wagner Marcenes; David J Margolis; Christopher Margono; Melvin B Marzan; Joseph R Masci; Mohammad T Mashal; Richard Matzopoulos; Bongani M Mayosi; Tasara T Mazorodze; Neil W Mcgill; John J Mcgrath; Martin Mckee; Abigail Mclain; Peter A Meaney; Catalina Medina; Man Mohan Mehndiratta; Wubegzier Mekonnen; Yohannes A Melaku; Michele Meltzer; Ziad A Memish; George A Mensah; Atte Meretoja; Francis A Mhimbira; Renata Micha; Ted R Miller; Edward J Mills; Philip B Mitchell; Charles N Mock; Norlinah Mohamed Ibrahim; Karzan A Mohammad; Ali H Mokdad; Glen L D Mola; Lorenzo Monasta; Julio C Montañez Hernandez; Marcella Montico; Thomas J Montine; Meghan D Mooney; Ami R Moore; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Andrew E Moran; Rintaro Mori; Joanna Moschandreas; Wilkister N Moturi; Madeline L Moyer; Dariush Mozaffarian; William T Msemburi; Ulrich O Mueller; Mitsuru Mukaigawara; Erin C Mullany; Michele E Murdoch; Joseph Murray; Kinnari S Murthy; Mohsen Naghavi; Aliya Naheed; Kovin S Naidoo; Luigi Naldi; Devina Nand; Vinay Nangia; K M Venkat Narayan; Chakib Nejjari; Sudan P Neupane; Charles R Newton; Marie Ng; Frida N Ngalesoni; Grant Nguyen; Muhammad I Nisar; Sandra Nolte; Ole F Norheim; Rosana E Norman; Bo Norrving; Luke Nyakarahuka; In-Hwan Oh; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Summer L Ohno; Bolajoko O Olusanya; John Nelson Opio; Katrina Ortblad; Alberto Ortiz; Amanda W Pain; Jeyaraj D Pandian; Carlo Irwin A Panelo; Christina Papachristou; Eun-Kee Park; Jae-Hyun Park; Scott B Patten; George C Patton; Vinod K Paul; Boris I Pavlin; Neil Pearce; David M Pereira; Rogelio Perez-Padilla; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Norberto Perico; Aslam Pervaiz; Konrad Pesudovs; Carrie B Peterson; Max Petzold; Michael R Phillips; Bryan K Phillips; David E Phillips; Frédéric B Piel; Dietrich Plass; Dan Poenaru; Suzanne Polinder; Daniel Pope; Svetlana Popova; Richie G Poulton; Farshad Pourmalek; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Noela M Prasad; Rachel L Pullan; Dima M Qato; D Alex Quistberg; Anwar Rafay; Kazem Rahimi; Sajjad U Rahman; Murugesan Raju; Saleem M Rana; Homie Razavi; K Srinath Reddy; Amany Refaat; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Serge Resnikoff; Antonio L Ribeiro; Lee Richardson; Jan Hendrik Richardus; D Allen Roberts; David Rojas-Rueda; Luca Ronfani; Gregory A Roth; Dietrich Rothenbacher; David H Rothstein; Jane T Rowley; Nobhojit Roy; George M Ruhago; Mohammad Y Saeedi; Sukanta Saha; Mohammad Ali Sahraian; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Juan R Sanabria; Logan Sandar; Itamar S Santos; Maheswar Satpathy; Monika Sawhney; Peter Scarborough; Ione J Schneider; Ben Schöttker; Austin E Schumacher; David C Schwebel; James G Scott; Soraya Seedat; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Peter T Serina; Edson E Servan-Mori; Katya A Shackelford; Amira Shaheen; Saeid Shahraz; Teresa Shamah Levy; Siyi Shangguan; Jun She; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Peilin Shi; Kenji Shibuya; Yukito Shinohara; Rahman Shiri; Kawkab Shishani; Ivy Shiue; Mark G Shrime; Inga D Sigfusdottir; Donald H Silberberg; Edgar P Simard; Shireen Sindi; Abhishek Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Lavanya Singh; Vegard Skirbekk; Erica Leigh Slepak; Karen Sliwa; Samir Soneji; Kjetil Søreide; Sergey Soshnikov; Luciano A Sposato; Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy; Jeffrey D Stanaway; Vasiliki Stathopoulou; Dan J Stein; Murray B Stein; Caitlyn Steiner; Timothy J Steiner; Antony Stevens; Andrea Stewart; Lars J Stovner; Konstantinos Stroumpoulis; Bruno F Sunguya; Soumya Swaminathan; Mamta Swaroop; Bryan L Sykes; Karen M Tabb; Ken Takahashi; Nikhil Tandon; David Tanne; Marcel Tanner; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Hugh R Taylor; Braden J Te Ao; Fabrizio Tediosi; Awoke M Temesgen; Tara Templin; Margreet Ten Have; Eric Y Tenkorang; Abdullah S Terkawi; Blake Thomson; Andrew L Thorne-Lyman; Amanda G Thrift; George D Thurston; Taavi Tillmann; Marcello Tonelli; Fotis Topouzis; Hideaki Toyoshima; Jefferson Traebert; Bach X Tran; Matias Trillini; Thomas Truelsen; Miltiadis Tsilimbaris; Emin M Tuzcu; Uche S Uchendu; Kingsley N Ukwaja; Eduardo A Undurraga; Selen B Uzun; Wim H Van Brakel; Steven Van De Vijver; Coen H van Gool; Jim Van Os; Tommi J Vasankari; N Venketasubramanian; Francesco S Violante; Vasiliy V Vlassov; Stein Emil Vollset; Gregory R Wagner; Joseph Wagner; Stephen G Waller; Xia Wan; Haidong Wang; Jianli Wang; Linhong Wang; Tati S Warouw; Scott Weichenthal; Elisabete Weiderpass; Robert G Weintraub; Wang Wenzhi; Andrea Werdecker; Ronny Westerman; Harvey A Whiteford; James D Wilkinson; Thomas N Williams; Charles D Wolfe; Timothy M Wolock; Anthony D Woolf; Sarah Wulf; Brittany Wurtz; Gelin Xu; Lijing L Yan; Yuichiro Yano; Pengpeng Ye; Gökalp K Yentür; Paul Yip; Naohiro Yonemoto; Seok-Jun Yoon; Mustafa Z Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Maysaa E Zaki; Yong Zhao; Yingfeng Zheng; David Zonies; Xiaonong Zou; Joshua A Salomon; Alan D Lopez; Theo Vos
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Cross-Sectional Associations between Body Mass Index and Hyperlipidemia among Adults in Northeastern China.

Authors:  Wenwang Rao; Yingying Su; Guang Yang; Yue Ma; Rui Liu; Shangchao Zhang; Shibin Wang; Yingli Fu; Changgui Kou; Yaqin Yu; Qiong Yu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  24 in total

1.  Longitudinal Change of Perceived Salt Intake and Stroke Risk in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Yun Li; Zhe Huang; Cheng Jin; Aijun Xing; Yesong Liu; Chunmei Huangfu; Alice H Lichtenstein; Katherine L Tucker; Shouling Wu; Xiang Gao
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Onset and Recurrence Characteristics of Chinese Patients with Noncardiogenic Ischemic Stroke in Chinese Medicine Hospital.

Authors:  Yang Gao; Yan-Ming Xie; Gui-Qian Wang; Ye-Feng Cai; Xiao-Ming Shen; De-Xi Zhao; Ying-Zhen Xie; Yin Zhang; Fan-Xing Meng; Hai-Qing Yu; Jun-Jie Jiang; Rui-Li Wei
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Prevalence and risk factors of stroke in a rural area of northern China: a 10-year comparative study.

Authors:  Ling-Yun Ma; Xiao-Dan Wang; Shuai Liu; Jinghuan Gan; Wenzheng Hu; Zhichao Chen; Jiuyan Han; Xiaoshan Du; Han Zhu; Zhihong Shi; Yong Ji
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 4.  Knowledge, Prevention Practice and Associated Factors of Stroke Among Hypertensive and Diabetic Patients - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abreham Degu Melak; Dawit Wondimsigegn; Zemene Demelash Kifle
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-08-11

5.  Prevalence and the age of onset patterns of stroke in Jiangsu Province, China.

Authors:  Chenlu He; Qian Chen; Ziyuan Shen; Ying Zhang; Hao Hou; Yifei Pei; Wei Wang; Xunbao Zhang
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.830

6.  Neurological manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gaurav Nepal; Jessica Holly Rehrig; Gentle Sunder Shrestha; Yow Ka Shing; Jayant Kumar Yadav; Rajeev Ojha; Gaurab Pokhrel; Zhi Lan Tu; Dong Ya Huang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  The prevalence of intracranial stenosis in patients at low and moderate risk of stroke.

Authors:  Hong-Xiu Chen; Li-Juan Wang; Yi Yang; Fei-Xue Yue; Li-Min Chen; Ying-Qi Xing
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 6.570

8.  An exploratory investigation of geographic disparities of stroke prevalence in Florida using circular and flexible spatial scan statistics.

Authors:  Shamarial Roberson; Rahel Dawit; Jaleesa Moore; Agricola Odoi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Accumulation of Key Stroke Risk Factors and Its Association With the Characteristics of Subjects: A Population Based Cross Sectional Study.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Hang Jin; Zhen-Ni Guo; Hui-Jie Sun; Fu-Liang Zhang; Xin Sun; Yi Yang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Incidence of Stroke and Mortality in Chinese Patients with Sleep-Breathing Disorders: A Clinical Population-Based (CPB) Study.

Authors:  Tao Hu; Yang Gu; Yan Xu; Juebo Yu; Feng Wu; Rui Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.