Literature DB >> 28870623

Development of fracture liaison services: What have we learned?

Kate E Shipman1, Alison Doyle2, Hilary Arden2, Tim Jones2, Neil J Gittoes3.   

Abstract

Due to dramatic improvements in life expectancy we are seeing a rapidly growing population of older people. Increasing frailty and susceptibility to fragility fractures are becoming pressing issues for both the individuals that suffer them as well as society, through pressures on health and social care budgets. The success of fracture liaison services, co-ordinated programmes enhancing the management of the fracture, osteoporosis, frailty and falls risk, is undisputed. To achieve optimal outcomes, however, it is important to have a standardisation of design, scope and structure of the service. Experience has taught us that by delegating responsibility for the holistic care of the patient to a trained and adequately resourced professional/team (fracture prevention practitioner) with clear standards against which benchmarking occurs, is the optimal model of delivery. Future challenges include how best to measure the success of services in imparting a reduction in fractures at a local population level as well as how to detect those patients with unmet need who do not uniformly present to health care services, such as those with vertebral fractures. The implementation of fracture liaison services however, is a clear demonstration of how collaboration between health care, social care and charity organisations, among others, has materially improved the health and well-being of the population.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bisphosphonate; DXA; Development; Fracture clinic; Fracture liaison service; Frailty; Hip; Injury prevention; Osteoporosis; Vertebral

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28870623     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures: Which one has the highest burden?

Authors:  Maroun Rizkallah; Falah Bachour; Mirvat El Khoury; Amer Sebaaly; Boutros Finianos; Rawad El Hage; Ghassan Maalouf
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2020-08-08

2.  Fragility Fracture Prevention-Implementing a Fracture Liaison Service in a High Volume Orthopedic Hospital.

Authors:  Federico Pennestrì; Sabrina Corbetta; Vittoria Favero; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  A 2-year follow-up of a novel Fracture Liaison Service: can we reduce the mortality in elderly hip fracture patients? A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  D González-Quevedo; V Pérez-Del-Río; D Moriel-Garceso; N Fernández-Arroyabe; G García-Meléndez; M Montañez-Ruiz; M Bravo-Bardají; D García-de-Quevedo; I Tamimi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.071

4.  Longer-term quality of life following major trauma: age only significantly affects outcome after the age of 80 years.

Authors:  Thomas Gross; Sabrina Morell; Felix Amsler
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 5.  Repurposing NGO data for better research outcomes: a scoping review of the use and secondary analysis of NGO data in health policy and systems research.

Authors:  Sarah C Masefield; Alice Megaw; Matt Barlow; Piran C L White; Henrice Altink; Jean Grugel
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-06-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.