Abhishek Maiti1, Maryam Nemati-Shafaee2, Pavlos Msaouel3, Lance C Pagliaro4, Eric Jonasch5, Nizar M Tannir5, Amishi Y Shah6. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX. 2. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 3. Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 4. Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 5. Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 6. Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: ayshah@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with sarcomatoid renal-cell carcinomas (sRCC) have poor outcomes and limited treatment options. Preclinical and clinical data suggest susceptibility to cytotoxic agents and vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapies. We designed a phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab in sRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or unresectable sRCC were eligible for inclusion. Patients received oral capecitabine 800 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle, intravenous gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15, and intravenous bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15. Primary end points were progression-free survival and time to treatment failure (TTF). Secondary end points were safety, objective response rate, and overall survival. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled onto the trial. One patient was excluded from survival analysis and 4 from response analysis as a result of missing data. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-7.7), median TTF was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.4-6.0), and median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI, 10.6-13.4). Objective response rate was 20% (5 partial responses, 1 complete response), and disease control rate was 73%. Thirty-one (91%) of the 34 patients discontinued treatment. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was progressive disease, which occurred in 24 patients (71%). The most common grade 3 toxicity was rash (including hand-foot syndrome) in 24% patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of capecitabine, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab is an option for patients with sRCC; however, response rates are low. Novel therapies are needed to improve outcomes in patients with sRCC.
BACKGROUND:Patients with sarcomatoid renal-cell carcinomas (sRCC) have poor outcomes and limited treatment options. Preclinical and clinical data suggest susceptibility to cytotoxic agents and vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapies. We designed a phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab in sRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or unresectable sRCC were eligible for inclusion. Patients received oral capecitabine 800 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle, intravenous gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15, and intravenous bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15. Primary end points were progression-free survival and time to treatment failure (TTF). Secondary end points were safety, objective response rate, and overall survival. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled onto the trial. One patient was excluded from survival analysis and 4 from response analysis as a result of missing data. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-7.7), median TTF was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.4-6.0), and median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI, 10.6-13.4). Objective response rate was 20% (5 partial responses, 1 complete response), and disease control rate was 73%. Thirty-one (91%) of the 34 patients discontinued treatment. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was progressive disease, which occurred in 24 patients (71%). The most common grade 3 toxicity was rash (including hand-foot syndrome) in 24% patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of capecitabine, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab is an option for patients with sRCC; however, response rates are low. Novel therapies are needed to improve outcomes in patients with sRCC.
Authors: Ana M Molina; Satish K Tickoo; Nicole Ishill; Michael J Trinos; Lawrence H Schwartz; Sujata Patil; Darren R Feldman; Victor E Reuter; Paul Russo; Robert J Motzer Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: John D Hainsworth; Jeffrey A Sosman; David R Spigel; Donna L Edwards; Cara Baughman; Anthony Greco Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-10-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Timothy D Jones; John N Eble; Mingsheng Wang; Gregory T Maclennan; Shashi Jain; Liang Cheng Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Badar M Mian; Nishin Bhadkamkar; Joel W Slaton; Peter W T Pisters; Danai Daliani; David A Swanson; Louis L Pisters Journal: J Urol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Paola Dal Cin; Raf Sciot; Hein Van Poppel; Piera Balzarini; Tania Roskams; Herman Van den Berghe Journal: Cancer Genet Cytogenet Date: 2002-04-01
Authors: Naomi B Haas; Xinyi Lin; Judith Manola; Michael Pins; Glenn Liu; David McDermott; David Nanus; Elisabeth Heath; George Wilding; Janice Dutcher Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2011-02-06 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: B Escudier; J P Droz; F Rolland; M J Terrier-Lacombe; G Gravis; P Beuzeboc; B Chauvet; C Chevreau; J C Eymard; T Lesimple; Y Merrouche; S Oudard; F Priou; C Guillemare; S Gourgou; S Culine Journal: J Urol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ali Reza Golshayan; Saby George; Daniel Y Heng; Paul Elson; Laura S Wood; Tarek M Mekhail; Jorge A Garcia; Hakan Aydin; Ming Zhou; Ronald M Bukowski; Brian I Rini Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Cora N Sternberg; Ian D Davis; Jozef Mardiak; Cezary Szczylik; Eunsik Lee; John Wagstaff; Carlos H Barrios; Pamela Salman; Oleg A Gladkov; Alexander Kavina; Juan J Zarbá; Mei Chen; Lauren McCann; Lini Pandite; Debasish F Roychowdhury; Robert E Hawkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Cedric Lebacle; Aydin Pooli; Thomas Bessede; Jacques Irani; Allan J Pantuck; Alexandra Drakaki Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jose A Karam; A Ari Hakimi; Kyle A Blum; Sounak Gupta; Satish K Tickoo; Timothy A Chan; Paul Russo; Robert J Motzer Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 14.432