| Literature DB >> 28870255 |
Xin Tang1,2, Xiaobin Shi2, Deyong Zhang2, Fan Li3, Fei Yan4, Youjun Zhang5, Yong Liu6, Xuguo Zhou7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years, two of the crinivirus, Tomato chlorosis virus (ToCV) and Cucurbit chlorotic yellows virus (CCYV) have gained increasing attention due to their rapid spread and devastating impacts on vegetable production worldwide. Both of these viruses are transmitted by the sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), in a semi-persistent manner. Up to now, there is still lack of report in Hainan, the south of China.Entities:
Keywords: Alternanthera philoxeroides; Molecular identification; Q biotype; Tomato chlorosis virus; cucurbit chlorotic yellows virus; Bemisia tabaci
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28870255 PMCID: PMC5584531 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-017-0833-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Fig. 1Geographic locations of surveyed plants. Five sites in Yunlongzhen, Yongfazhen, Xinzhuzhen, Yachengzhen, and Tianyazhen were shown in the figure. In each site tomato and cucumber plants were investigated and sampled. Red circles and sectors represent tomato plants. Green circles and sectors represent cucumber plants. Yellow sectors represent virus-infected tomato and cucumber plants
Primers of the ToCV, CCYV and whitefly
| Name | Primer | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| ToCV | F | AAACTGCCTGCATGAAAAGTCTC |
| R | GGTTTGGATTTTGGTACTACATTCAGT | |
| CCYV | F | CGCAATCAATAAGGCGGCGACC |
| R | ACTACAACCTCCCGGTGCCAACT | |
| Whitefly | F | TTGATTTTTTGGTCATCCAGAAGT |
| R | CTGAATATCGRCGAGGCATTCC |
Incidence of ToCV and CCYV
| Virus | Host plants | Geographic locations | Number of plants surveyed | Number of infected plants | Incidence of chlorosis disease (%) | Average incidence of chlorosis disease (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToCV | Tomato | Yunlongzhen | 145 | 0 | 0.0 | 69.8 |
| Xinzhuzhen | 146 | 93 | 63.7 | |||
| Yongfazhen | 154 | 117 | 76.0 | |||
| Yachengzhen | 165 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| Tianyazhen | 150 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| CCYV | Cucumber | Yunlongzhen | 92 | 0 | 0.0 | 62.6 |
| Xinzhuzhen | 90 | 48 | 53.3 | |||
| Yongfazhen | 84 | 62 | 73.8 | |||
| Yachengzhen | 66 | 40 | 60.6 | |||
| Tianyazhen | 81 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| ToCV | Weed | Yongfazhen | 60 | 9 | 15.0 | 15.0 |
| CCYV | Weed | Yongfazhen | 60 | 7 | 11.7 | 11.7 |
Fig. 2Whitefly biotype detection. CK1 positive control; CK2 negative control; CK3 black control. a Whitefly biotype on infected tomato plants. b Whitefly biotype on infected cucumber plants. The size of 122 bp and 498 bp fragment based on amplification of mtCOI and restriction endonuclease was used to detect the biotype. Results of 20 samples were shown in figure a and b
Whitefly biotype and viruliferous rate
| Virus | Number of whiteflies | Whitefly biotype | Number of viruliferous whiteflies | Viruliferous rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToCV | 60 | Q | 39 | 65.0% |
| CCYV | 60 | Q | 33 | 55.0% |
Fig. 3ToCV detection from tomato plants. CK1 positive control; CK2 negative control; CK3 black control. The size of 466 bp based on amplification of HSP70h gene of ToCV was used. Results of 20 samples were shown in this figure
Fig. 5ToCV and CCYV detection from weeds. a CCYV detection on weeds. b ToCV detection on weeds. CK1 positive control; CK2 negative control; CK3 black control. The size of 804 bp based on amplification of CP (coat protein) gene of CCYV and the size of 466 bp based on amplification of HSP70h gene of ToCV were used. Results of 20 samples were shown in figure a and b
Fig. 4CCYV detection from cucumber plants. CK1 positive control; CK2 negative control; CK3 black control. The size of 804 bp based on amplification of CP (coat protein) gene of CCYV was used. Results of 20 samples were shown in this figure
Nucleotide sequencing analysis of B. tabaci and plant viruses
| Sample | Sequencing description | Accession | Max score | Total score | Query cover | E value | Identities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomato |
| KC887999.1 | 863 | 863 | 45% | 0.0 | 100% |
| Cucumber |
| KX118632.1 | 1354 | 1354 | 97% | 0.0 | 99% |
|
|
| KT265875.1 | 1062 | 1062 | 99% | 0.0 | 99% |
| Weed |
| KC887999.1 | 856 | 856 | 41% | 0.0 | 99% |
| Weed |
| KX118632.1 | 1055 | 1055 | 77% | 0.0 | 97% |
Fig. 6Virus incidence dynamic on tomato, cucumber and weeds in four of plant growth stages. a Viruliferous rate of ToCV in four of the tomato growth stages. b Viruliferous rate of CCYV in four of the cucumber growth stages. Values are means ± SE. 1 transplanting stage; 2 seedling stage; 3 flowering stage; 4 ripening stage. On each growth stage, different lowercase letters of a-d indicate significant differences on weed and different uppercase letters of A-D indicate significant differences on plants (P < 0.05)