Blake Byron Walker1, Nadine Schuurman1, Ajit Auluck2, Scott A Lear3, Miriam Rosin4. 1. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. bwalker@sfu.ca. 2. British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. drajitauluck@gmail.com. 3. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. SLear@providencehealth.bc.ca. 4. British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. miriam.rosin@sfu.ca.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Both socioeconomic status and travel time to cancer treatment have been associated with treatment choice and patient outcomes. An improved understanding of the relationship between these two dimensions of access may enable cancer control experts to better target patients with poor access, particularly in isolated suburban and rural communities. METHODS: Using geographical information systems, head and neck cancer patients across British Columbia, Canada from 1981 to 2009, were mapped and their travel times to the nearest treatment center at their time of diagnosis were modelled. Patients' travel times were analysed by urban, suburban, and rural neighborhood types and an index of multiple socioeconomic deprivation was used to assess the role of socioeconomic status in patients' spatial access. RESULTS: Significant associations between socioeconomic deprivation and spatial access to treatment were identified, with the most deprived quintiles of patients experiencing nearly twice the travel time as the least deprived quintile. The sharpest disparities were observed among the most deprived patient populations in suburban and rural areas. However, the establishment of new treatment centers has decreased overall travel times by 28% in recent decades. CONCLUSIONS: Residence in a neighborhood with high socioeconomic deprivation is strongly associated with head and neck cancer patients' spatial access to cancer treatment centers. Patients residing in the most socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods consistently have longer travel times in urban, suburban, and rural communities in the study area.
INTRODUCTION: Both socioeconomic status and travel time to cancer treatment have been associated with treatment choice and patient outcomes. An improved understanding of the relationship between these two dimensions of access may enable cancer control experts to better target patients with poor access, particularly in isolated suburban and rural communities. METHODS: Using geographical information systems, head and neck cancerpatients across British Columbia, Canada from 1981 to 2009, were mapped and their travel times to the nearest treatment center at their time of diagnosis were modelled. Patients' travel times were analysed by urban, suburban, and rural neighborhood types and an index of multiple socioeconomic deprivation was used to assess the role of socioeconomic status in patients' spatial access. RESULTS: Significant associations between socioeconomic deprivation and spatial access to treatment were identified, with the most deprived quintiles of patients experiencing nearly twice the travel time as the least deprived quintile. The sharpest disparities were observed among the most deprived patient populations in suburban and rural areas. However, the establishment of new treatment centers has decreased overall travel times by 28% in recent decades. CONCLUSIONS: Residence in a neighborhood with high socioeconomic deprivation is strongly associated with head and neck cancerpatients' spatial access to cancer treatment centers. Patients residing in the most socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods consistently have longer travel times in urban, suburban, and rural communities in the study area.
Entities:
Keywords:
Canada; cancer treatment; deprivation; geographic information systems; head and neck cancers; socioeconomic status; spacial access
Authors: Jennifer A Schlichting; Nitin A Pagedar; Catherine Chioreso; Charles F Lynch; Mary E Charlton Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Marc A Emerson; Douglas R Farquhar; Nicholas R Lenze; Siddharth Sheth; Angela L Mazul; Adam M Zanation; Trevor G Hackman; Mark C Weissler; Jose P Zevallos; Wendell G Yarbrough; Paul Brennan; Behnoush Abedi-Ardekani; Andrew F Olshan Journal: Head Neck Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 3.147