Literature DB >> 28869746

Physiological intensity profile, exercise load and performance predictors of a 65-km mountain ultra-marathon.

Alessandro Fornasiero1,2, Aldo Savoldelli1,2, Damiano Fruet1, Gennaro Boccia1,2,3, Barbara Pellegrini1,2, Federico Schena1,2.   

Abstract

The aims of the study were to describe the physiological profile of a 65-km (4000-m cumulative elevation gain) running mountain ultra-marathon (MUM) and to identify predictors of MUM performance. Twenty-three amateur trail-runners performed anthropometric evaluations and an uphill graded exercise test (GXT) for VO2max, ventilatory thresholds (VTs), power outputs (PMax, PVTs) and heart rate response (HRmax, HR@VTs). Heart rate (HR) was monitored during the race and intensity was expressed as: Zone I (<VT1), Zone II (VT1-VT2), Zone III (>VT2) for exercise load calculation (training impulse, TRIMP). Mean race intensity was 77.1%±4.4% of HRmax distributed as: 85.7%±19.4% Zone I, 13.9%±18.6% Zone II, 0.4%±0.9% Zone III. Exercise load was 766±110 TRIMP units. Race time (11.8±1.6h) was negatively correlated with VO2max (r = -0.66, P <0.001) and PMax (r = -0.73, P <0.001), resulting these variables determinant in predicting MUM performance, whereas exercise thresholds did not improve performance prediction. Laboratory variables explained only 59% of race time variance, underlining the multi-factorial character of MUM performance. Our results support the idea that VT1 represents a boundary of tolerable intensity in this kind of events, where exercise load is extremely high. This information can be helpful in identifying optimal pacing strategies to complete such extremely demanding MUMs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mountain ultra-marathon; exercise intensity distribution; heart rate; thresholds; training load

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28869746     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1374707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  13 in total

1.  Recommendations on Youth Participation in Ultra-Endurance Running Events: A Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Volker Scheer; Ricardo J S Costa; Stéphane Doutreleau; Beat Knechtle; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; William O Roberts; Oliver Stoll; Adam S Tenforde; Brian Krabak
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Study of the Kinetics of the Determinants of Performance During a Mountain Ultramarathon: Multidisciplinary Protocol of the First Trail Scientifique de Clécy 2021.

Authors:  Benoit Mauvieux; Corentin Hingrand; Joffrey Drigny; Amir Hodzic; Pauline Baron; Rémy Hurdiel; Romain Jouffroy; Jean-Charles Vauthier; Mathias Pessiglione; Antonius Wiehler; Francis Degache; Sébastien Pavailler; Elsa Heyman; Mathilde Plard; Philippe Noirez; Blaise Dubois; Jean François Esculier; Anh Phong Nguyen; Joachim Van Cant; Olivier Roy Baillargeon; Benoit Pairot de Fontenay; Pierre Louis Delaunay; Stéphane Besnard
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Changes in cardiac function following a speed ascent to the top of Europe at 4808 m.

Authors:  Benoit Champigneulle; Stéphane Doutreleau; Pierre Bouzat; Samuel Verges; Sébastien Baillieul; Julien Vincent Brugniaux; Paul Robach
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Pulmonary and Inspiratory Muscle Function Response to a Mountain Ultramarathon.

Authors:  Ignacio Martinez-Navarro; Eladio Collado; Bárbara Hernando; Carlos Hernando
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Effects of 120 g/h of Carbohydrates Intake during a Mountain Marathon on Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage in Elite Runners.

Authors:  Aitor Viribay; Soledad Arribalzaga; Juan Mielgo-Ayuso; Arkaitz Castañeda-Babarro; Jesús Seco-Calvo; Aritz Urdampilleta
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Physiological profile of adult male long-distance trail runners: variations according to competitive level (national or regional).

Authors:  Joana Oliveira-Rosado; João P Duarte; Paulo Sousa-E-Silva; Daniela C Costa; Diogo V Martinho; Hugo Sarmento; João Valente-Dos-Santos; Luís M Rama; Óscar M Tavares; Jorge Conde; Joaquim Castanheira; Rui Soles-Gonçalves; Ricardo R Agostinete; Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-04-06

Review 7.  Relationship of Carbohydrate Intake during a Single-Stage One-Day Ultra-Trail Race with Fatigue Outcomes and Gastrointestinal Problems: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Soledad Arribalzaga; Aitor Viribay; Julio Calleja-González; Diego Fernández-Lázaro; Arkaitz Castañeda-Babarro; Juan Mielgo-Ayuso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Effects of 120 vs. 60 and 90 g/h Carbohydrate Intake during a Trail Marathon on Neuromuscular Function and High Intensity Run Capacity Recovery.

Authors:  Aritz Urdampilleta; Soledad Arribalzaga; Aitor Viribay; Arkaitz Castañeda-Babarro; Jesús Seco-Calvo; Juan Mielgo-Ayuso
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Predicting Competition Performance in Short Trail Running Races with Lactate Thresholds.

Authors:  Volker Scheer; Solveig Vieluf; Tanja I Janssen; Hans-Christian Heitkamp
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  What are the Limiting Factors During an Ultra-Marathon? A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature.

Authors:  Arkaitz Garbisu-Hualde; Jordan Santos-Concejero
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.