Literature DB >> 28869159

A Comparison of Objective Assessment Data for the United States and International Medical Graduates in a General Surgery Residency.

Francisco Cardenas Lara1, Nimesh D Naik1, T K Pandian1, Becca L Gas1, Suzanne Strubel1, Rachel Cadeliña1, Stephanie F Heller1, David R Farley2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare objective assessment scores between international medical graduates (IMGs) and United States Medical Graduates. Scores of residents who completed a preliminary year, who later matched into a categorical position, were compared to those who matched directly into a categorical position at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester.
DESIGN: Postgraduate year (PGY) 1 to 5 residents participate in a biannual multistation, OSCE-style assessment event as part of our surgical training program. Assessment data were, retrospectively, reviewed and analyzed from 2008 to 2016 for PGY-1 and from 2013 to 2016 for PGY 2 to 5 categorical residents.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Categorical PGY 1 to 5 General Surgery (GS) residents at Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN.
RESULTS: A total of 86 GS residents were identified. Twenty-one residents (1 United States Medical Graduates [USMG] and 20 IMGs) completed a preliminary GS year, before matching into a categorical position and 68 (58 USMGs and 10 IMGs) residents, who matched directly into a categorical position, were compared. Mean scores (%) for the summer and winter multistation assessments were higher for PGY-1 trainees with a preliminary year than those without (summer: 59 vs. 37, p < 0.001; winter: 69 vs. 61, p = 0.05). Summer and winter PGY-2 scores followed the same pattern (74 vs. 64, p < 0.01; 85 vs. 71, p < 0.01). For the PGY 3 to 5 assessments, differences in scores between these groups were not observed. IMGs and USMGs scored equivalently on all assessments. Overall, junior residents showed greater score improvement between tests than their senior colleagues (mean score increase: PGY 1-2 = 18 vs. PGY 3-5 = 3, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Residents with a previous preliminary GS year at our institution scored higher on initial assessments compared to trainees with no prior GS training at our institution. The scoring advantage of an added preliminary year decreased as trainees progressed through residency.
Copyright © 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; General Surgery; International Medical Graduates; Medical Knowledge; Patient Care; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Surgical Education; United States Medical Graduates

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28869159     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  2 in total

1.  Surgical Training in South Africa: An Overview and Attempt to Assess the Training System from the Perspective of Foreign Trainees.

Authors:  Guglielmo Mantica; Pietro Fransvea; Francesco Virdis; Timothy C Hardcastle; Hilgard Ackermann; Carlo Terrone; Gianluca Costa; André Van der Merwe; Genoveffa Balducci; Elmin Steyn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Challenges for International Medical Graduates in the US Graduate Medical Education and Health Care System Environment: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Carlos Murillo Zepeda; Francisco Omar Alcalá Aguirre; Edgar Manuel Luna Landa; Edgardo Nahúm Reyes Güereque; Gilberto Pérez Rodríguez García; Lilian Sabinne Diaz Montoya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.