Literature DB >> 28868494

Small Bowel Obstruction Seven Years After Video Capsule Retention.

Cátia Leitão1, Ana Caldeira1, António Banhudo1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capsule Endoscopes/adverse effects; Foreign Bodies; Intestinal Obstruction; Small Intestine

Year:  2016        PMID: 28868494      PMCID: PMC5580136          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpge.2016.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2387-1954


× No keyword cloud information.
Capsule retention is one of the known complications of capsule endoscopy. The risk of retention is high in patients with prolonged nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, extensive Crohn's Disease and previous major abdominal surgery. Most cases of capsule retention are asymptomatic and should be managed conservatively whenever possible. Some can be naturally excreted and other are amenable to medical therapy or endoscopic removal. Surgery is considered if the patient develops acute small bowel obstruction symptoms or the origin is a malignant lesion. A 69-year-old man, hypertensive, was referred to the Gastroenterology Department to perform an upper endoscopy on November of 2012 because of diffuse abdominal pain and dark colored emesis. Blood workup was unremarkable, except for leukocytosis. The abdominal X-ray and computed tomography scan demonstrated small bowel distension and revealed a metallic foreign body of 20 mm localized in the lumen (Fig. 1). Due to acute occlusive syndrome, patient was submitted to an exploratory laparotomy with resection of one segment of jejunum with 35 cm and 4 inflammatory stenotic regions, one of them occluded by a cylindrical, black colored foreign body – an endoscopic capsule (Fig. 2)! The histologic result of the surgical specimen confirmed a small bowel diverticula and inflammatory strictures related to diverticulitis. During the review of patient's medical history we confirmed that he did not mention any digestive symptoms and he had a capsule endoscopy 7 years (on July of 2005) before during the workup of microcytic hypochromic anemia. The report of the capsule endoscopy did not mention blood in the lumen or mucosal changes, stressing that the capsule did not reach the cecum during the recorded time. However, there were not any signs/symptoms or past medical history at presentation (pre-capsule endoscopy) associated with a higher risk of capsule retention that could have advised the use of small bowel imaging or patency capsule in this patient. The authors also reviewed the capsule study confirming that no stenosis was identified. Interestingly, the patient did not remember any abdominal symptoms during the 7 years of capsule retention.
Figure 1

The abdominal X-ray and computed tomography showing air fluid levels, small bowel loops distention and a foreign body.

Figure 2

Segment of the resected small bowel containing the retained capsule.

The abdominal X-ray and computed tomography showing air fluid levels, small bowel loops distention and a foreign body. Segment of the resected small bowel containing the retained capsule. As far as we are aware this is the longest reported case of capsule retention, an unusual case of retained endoscopic capsule in a patient without any suspicion of stenosis of the intestine and which remained asymptomatic over 7 years.

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhuan Liao; Rui Gao; Can Xu; Zhao-Shen Li
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  The longest duration of retention of a video capsule.

Authors:  Chris Harrington; Colin Rodgers
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-08

3.  Retention of the capsule endoscope: a single-center experience of 1000 capsule endoscopy procedures.

Authors:  Feng Li; Suryakanth R Gurudu; Giovanni De Petris; Virender K Sharma; Arthur D Shiff; Russell I Heigh; David E Fleischer; Janice Post; Paula Erickson; Jonathan A Leighton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Incidence, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic approaches of capsule endoscopy-related adverse events in a large study population.

Authors:  Ignacio Fernández-Urién; Cristina Carretero; Begoña González; Vicente Pons; Ángel Caunedo; Julio Valle; Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo; Antonio López-Higueras; Mariano Valdés; Pedro Menchen; Pedro Fernández; Miguel Muñoz-Navas; Javier Jiménez; Juan Manuel Herrerías
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.086

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Capsule endoscopy with retention of 4 years: A case report.

Authors:  Hongchao Chen; Zhe Zhang; Muhan Zhang; Dandan Wang; Mengmeng Jia; Baisui Feng
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Natural elimination of a video capsule after retention for 1 year in a patient with small bowel Crohn disease: A case report.

Authors:  So Yeon Lee; Ju Yup Lee; Yoo Jin Lee; Kyung Sik Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.