Literature DB >> 28868411

Finding a Needle in a Haystack: The Diagnosis of a Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor by Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.

Rosa Coelho1, Susana Rodrigues1, Roberto Silva2, Helena Baldaia2, Guilherme Macedo1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prostate biopsy, usually performed by a transrectal approach, is executed when there is a suspicion of prostate cancer. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are epithelial neoplasms with predominant neuroendocrine differentiation and only 19% of them are localized in the rectum. CASE REPORT: The authors describe a 73-year-old man without a significant past medical history that underwent a prostate biopsy because of urinary complaints and elevated serum levels of prostate specific antigen. The histology revealed a well-differentiated NET characterized as a low-grade tumor (G1). A total colonoscopy revealed a 5 mm sessile rectal polyp and in the splenic flexure a sessile lesion with central ulceration with 5 cm with histological features compatible with an adenocarcinoma.
CONCLUSION: This is the first case reported in the literature of a rectal NET diagnosed by transrectal prostate biopsy. This case is particularly unique because the diagnosis of the NET lead to the subsequent timely detection of a colonic adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; PSA, prostate specific antigen; Prostate/pathology; Rectal Neoplasms; TNM, tumor node metastases

Year:  2015        PMID: 28868411      PMCID: PMC5580133          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpge.2015.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2387-1954


Introduction

Prostate cancer is the leading cancer site in males after lung cancer, however screening the general population remains a controversial issue, since improved patient outcomes have not been demonstrated.2, 3 Prostate biopsy, typically performed by an urologist, is a minimally invasive procedure in which tissue samples are obtained through two different anatomic approaches: transrectal (the most common) and transperineal. Patients are referred to prostate biopsy in the presence of abnormal digital rectal exam or when repeated abnormal prostate specific antigen (PSA) values are found. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are epithelial neoplasms with predominant neuroendocrine differentiation. There are two major categories: well and poorly differentiated gastrointestinal NETs. NETs of the digestive system are relatively rare and 19% of them are localized in the rectum. Despite the low frequency of colorectal NETs, they are frequently associated with synchronous or metachronous other tumors, with an annual incidence reported of 3–15%.7, 8 The authors describe a case report where a polypoid rectum NET with 5 mm of major diameter was diagnosed by prostate transrectal biopsy. The patient was submitted to a total colonoscopy that revealed not only the rectal lesion, that was removed with a snare, but also a colonic adenocarcinoma in the splenic flexure. This is the first case reported in the literature of a rectal NET diagnosed by transrectal prostate biopsy.

Case presentation

We describe the case of a 73-year-old man that complained of nocturia and pollakiuria and had high PSA level. A transrectal prostate biopsy was performed and revealed a well-differentiated NET characterized as a low-grade tumor (G1). Total colonoscopy showed, in the distal rectum, a polypoid, yellowish, well-circumscribed lesion, measuring 5 mm (Fig. 1) removed with a diathermic snare. Biopsies were taken from a 5-cm ulcerated lesion observed in the splenic flexure occupying half of the circumference of the lumen (Fig. 2).
Figure 1

Colonoscopic view, in retroflexed maneuver, showing in the lower rectum a polypoid, yellowish, well-circumscribed lesion, measuring 5 mm compatible with a rectal NET.

Figure 2

Colonic adenocarcinoma in the splenic flexure with an ulcerated lesion with an apple-core appearance.

Colonoscopic view, in retroflexed maneuver, showing in the lower rectum a polypoid, yellowish, well-circumscribed lesion, measuring 5 mm compatible with a rectal NET. Colonic adenocarcinoma in the splenic flexure with an ulcerated lesion with an apple-core appearance. Histologically, the rectal lesion was a tumor centered in submucosa and focally in the mucosa with a trabecular and acinar pattern composed by small and monomorphic cells with round and hyperchromatic nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm (Fig. 3a). There was no necrosis or lymphovascular invasion. The immunohistochemical study revealed strong and diffuse staining of the tumor cells for synaptophysin without expression of chromogranin A (Fig. 3b and c). Mitotic index was less than 1 mitosis per 10 high-power field. The proliferative index by Ki-67 was less than 1%. With these histological and immunohistochemical features the diagnosis of a well-differentiated of low-grade NET was made.
Figure 3

Neuroendocrine tumor. Higher magnification showing monomorphic cells containing small, round nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm (a: H&E 200×). In the immunohistochemical study the tumor cells stained for synaptophysin (b: 200×) without expression of chromogranin A (c: 200×).

Neuroendocrine tumor. Higher magnification showing monomorphic cells containing small, round nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm (a: H&E 200×). In the immunohistochemical study the tumor cells stained for synaptophysin (b: 200×) without expression of chromogranin A (c: 200×). The rectal NET was completely excised with a diathermic snare without complications (Fig. 4). Colonic biopsies from the splenic flexure lesion showed tubulovillous adenoma with high-grade dysplasia and foci of intramucosal adenocarcinoma (Fig. 5).
Figure 4

Colonoscopic view of the distal rectum after polypectomy of the rectal NET.

Figure 5

High-grade dysplasia and foci of adenocarcinoma in the splenic flexure (H&E 200×).

Colonoscopic view of the distal rectum after polypectomy of the rectal NET. High-grade dysplasia and foci of adenocarcinoma in the splenic flexure (H&E 200×). Thoracic, abdominal and pelvic computed tomography was performed and revealed no metastases nor lymphadenopathies. Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy was successfully performed and the colonic adenocarcinoma was staged as pT2N0M0.

Discussion

Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer in men, however screening the general population remains a controversial issue.1, 2 Prostate biopsy is an invasive procedure made usually through transrectal approach. We describe a patient with a histological diagnosis of NET (G1) after a prostate biopsy. The diagnosis was confirmed performing a colonoscopy that revealed in the distal rectum a polypoid, yellowish, well-circumscribed lesion measuring 5 mm. The colonoscopy performed showed an ulcerated lesion in the splenic flexure compatible with colonic adenocarcinoma. The authors describe a case of a successful diagnosis of a rectum NET made by prostate transrectal biopsy that allowed an adenocarcinoma colonic diagnosis. The NET, traditionally referred as carcinoid, often has the appearance of well circumscribed round lesions in the submucosa or extending to the muscular layer. As shown in Fig. 3, the cut surface sometimes has a yellowish color reflecting the high lipid content of these lesions. The colonoscopy performed in order to confirm the histology of prostate biopsy revealed another neoplasm – a colonic adenocarcinoma of the splenic flexure. In fact, as many as 29% of gastrointestinal carcinoids exhibit a synchronous or metachronous association with other tumors, usually adenocarcinomas of the colon. Our patient performed thoracic and abdominopelvic computed tomography that excluded the presence of metastasis. A somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was also performed and did not reveal significant changes. Imaging by positron-emission tomography is not routinely recommended for NETs because most of these tumors are well differentiated and have a low metabolic rate. According to the TNM staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control the tumor was classified as T2N0M0 (tumor invades muscularis propria without regional lymph node metastasis and no distant metastasis). The surgical resection is the primary treatment modality for these patients with localized colorectal cancer. A laparoscopic left hemicolectomy was performed without complications. Taking into consideration this case we think that patients could be submitted to screening colonoscopy or flexible sigmoscopy before performing prostate biopsy. In fact, even if it is low, the risk of tumor dissemination during the prostate biopsy in the presence of rectal tumors must be considered.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, in the literature this is the first rectum NET diagnosed by prostate transrectal biopsy. Although prostate biopsy is a relatively frequent procedure, this is the first case of a NET diagnosed in this manner. This case is particularly unique because the diagnosis of the NET lead to the subsequent timely detection of a colonic adenocarcinoma.

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Mohamed T Ismail; Leonard G Gomella
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Ben Lawrence; Bjorn I Gustafsson; Anthony Chan; Bernhard Svejda; Mark Kidd; Irvin M Modlin
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update.

Authors:  Kirsten L Greene; Peter C Albertsen; Richard J Babaian; H Ballentine Carter; Peter H Gann; Misop Han; Deborah Ann Kuban; A Oliver Sartor; Janet L Stanford; Anthony Zietman; Peter Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Jiemin Ma; Zhaohui Zou; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of well-differentiated gastroenterohepatic neuroendocrine tumours: a revised statement from a Canadian National Expert Group.

Authors:  W Kocha; J Maroun; H Kennecke; C Law; P Metrakos; J F Ouellet; R Reid; C Rowsell; A Shah; S Singh; S Van Uum; R Wong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Incidence and mortality of carcinoids of the colon. Data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry.

Authors:  G H Ballantyne; P E Savoca; J T Flannery; M H Ahlman; I M Modlin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum: a 10-year review of management.

Authors:  Jason R Moore; Brian Greenwell; Kaylee Nuckolls; David Schammel; Nicholas Schisler; Christine Schammel; Patrick Culumovic; Brian P McKinley; Steven D Trocha
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Antonio Berenguer; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Bert G Blijenberg; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  Irvin M Modlin; Kevin D Lye; Mark Kidd
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.