Rana'a T Al-Jamal1, Hardeep Singh Mudhar2, Zanna Currie1, Ian G Rennie3, Sachin M Salvi1. 1. Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK. 2. National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service (NSOPS), Department of Histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK. 3. Academic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, Department of Oncology, CR-UK/YCR Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and histopathological features of a conjunctival melanoma (CM) during early pregnancy. PROCEDURES: A 37-year-old, 20-week pregnant primigravida was referred to the Sheffield Ocular Oncology Service with a rapidly growing lesion arising from the right superior conjunctival fornix, noted from the first trimester of pregnancy. This was associated with pain and bloody discharge. Incisional biopsy confirmed the clinical suspicion of invasive CM. She was treated by primary surgical excision and cryotherapy under local anaesthesia. RESULTS: Histology of the excised specimen showed an invasive malignant melanoma with surrounding in situ conjunctival changes arising from a naevus. The melanoma was 10.5 mm thick, focally necrotic, and had a mitotic count of 11/mm2 focally. The patient responded well to surgical treatment. She gave birth to a healthy boy, and the placenta showed no evidence of metastatic melanoma. There has been no recurrence or distant metastasis during 5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: CM during pregnancy is extremely rare. Because of possible transformation to malignant melanoma, we recommend close monitoring of females known to have pigmented conjunctival lesions of the conjunctiva during pregnancy.
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and histopathological features of a conjunctival melanoma (CM) during early pregnancy. PROCEDURES: A 37-year-old, 20-week pregnant primigravida was referred to the Sheffield Ocular Oncology Service with a rapidly growing lesion arising from the right superior conjunctival fornix, noted from the first trimester of pregnancy. This was associated with pain and bloody discharge. Incisional biopsy confirmed the clinical suspicion of invasive CM. She was treated by primary surgical excision and cryotherapy under local anaesthesia. RESULTS: Histology of the excised specimen showed an invasive malignant melanoma with surrounding in situ conjunctival changes arising from a naevus. The melanoma was 10.5 mm thick, focally necrotic, and had a mitotic count of 11/mm2 focally. The patient responded well to surgical treatment. She gave birth to a healthy boy, and the placenta showed no evidence of metastatic melanoma. There has been no recurrence or distant metastasis during 5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: CM during pregnancy is extremely rare. Because of possible transformation to malignant melanoma, we recommend close monitoring of females known to have pigmented conjunctival lesions of the conjunctiva during pregnancy.