Literature DB >> 28867838

Addressing vulnerability of pregnant refugees.

Mary Malebranche1, Kara Nerenberg1, Amy Metcalfe2, Gabriel E Fabreau1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28867838      PMCID: PMC5578387          DOI: 10.2471/BLT.17.193664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


× No keyword cloud information.
The number of refugees – defined as individuals fleeing war, violence or a well-founded fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group – is currently estimated at an unprecedented 22.5 million. Countries resettling refugees urgently need to address the specific mental, physical and reproductive health needs of the growing number of refugee women. This is particularly important during pregnancy, when the vulnerability of refugee women is notably heightened, increasing their risk for largely preventable adverse maternal and newborn outcomes. In September 2016, during the United Nations Summit for Refugees and Migrants held in New York, the importance of tackling the specific vulnerabilities of refugee women was recognized by the United Nations General Assembly through the adoption of the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, marking an international call to action. As Canadian health-care practitioners, our shared perspective is on the vital role high-income countries such as Canada can play in optimizing the health of refugee women. Although the majority of global refugees are currently hosted by low- and middle-income countries, high-income countries with established refugee resettlement programmes such as Canada, Germany and Sweden have dramatically increased their resettlement efforts. This is reflected in a 77% increase in the number of refugees who resettled in high-income countries between 2015 and 2016. However, studies that have explored health outcomes among resettled refugee women in countries such as Australia, Canada and Sweden demonstrate significant disparities in maternal and perinatal outcomes when compared to non-displaced women.– Disparities include higher rates of preterm birth, low birth-weight infants, stillbirths and maternal mortality.– These adverse outcomes do not only impact mothers and their newborns in the immediate perinatal period: growing evidence suggests that adverse birth outcomes can have long-lasting repercussions on the health and development of the newborn well into adulthood. For example, infants born preterm are at increased risk for developing chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes and cardiovascular disease later in life. Moreover, evidence suggests that not only are first-generation migrant populations at increased risk of developing mental illness, but that this risk may persist into the second generation of resettled families. Therefore, failing to address the complex health and social needs of pregnant refugee women resettling in high-income countries means missing valuable opportunities to optimize health across two generations. By implementing and ensuring accessibility to evidence-based health-care interventions, we can work to mitigate adverse maternal and newborn outcomes for refugee women resettling in high-income countries. Many of these adverse outcomes are related to largely preventable risk factors such as suboptimal health prior to conception, short inter-pregnancy intervals and difficulty accessing timely prenatal care, thus presenting opportunities to identify and treat preexisting maternal conditions. However, due to multiple factors including language barriers, cultural differences and difficulty navigating complex health and social systems in host countries, refugee women tend to have delayed initiation of prenatal care and fewer prenatal visits. By addressing these barriers and ensuring refugee women have access to culturally sensitive reproductive care from conception to the postpartum period, we can reduce modifiable risk factors and strive to eliminate disparities in maternal and newborn outcomes. Moreover, interventions that improve maternal and newborn outcomes are cost–effective in the long term. The direct and indirect costs incurred across the lifespan associated with high-risk pregnancies, preterm deliveries and low birth-weight infants are markedly higher than those associated with healthy term infants. With developed nations increasingly challenged by ever-expanding health care expenditures, investing in targeted and cost–effective interventions, such as prenatal care for vulnerable populations – namely refugee women – is vital. Failing to do so may result in long-lasting morbidity for refugee mothers and their newborns and lead to costly long-term sequelae. In the context of the current global refugee crisis and international calls to protect the rights of refugees and eliminate striking disparities in the maternal and perinatal outcomes of refugee women, we must take urgent action to address their unmet health needs, particularly during the highly vulnerable time surrounding pregnancy. Through targeted, evidence-based and cost–effective interventions, we can ensure refugee women and their children are ultimately afforded equal opportunity to realize their full educational, social and economic potential as they rebuild their lives in their new homes. Though we have focused specifically on the role of high-income countries in doing so, this issue is global. Across high-, middle- and low-income countries alike, we cannot afford to ignore the United Nations’ call to action to protect and care for refugee women.
  8 in total

Review 1.  A meta-analysis of the risk for psychotic disorders among first- and second-generation immigrants.

Authors:  F Bourque; E van der Ven; A Malla
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 7.723

2.  The economic impact of high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  W E Feldman; B Wood
Journal:  J Health Care Finance       Date:  1997

3.  Use of maternal health services: comparing refugee, immigrant and US-born populations.

Authors:  Katherine Kentoffio; Seth A Berkowitz; Steven J Atlas; Sarah A Oo; Sanja Percac-Lima
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-12

4.  Obstetric risks and outcomes of refugee women at a single centre in Toronto.

Authors:  Tharani Kandasamy; Rebecca Cherniak; Rajiv Shah; Mark H Yudin; Rachel Spitzer
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2014-04

Review 5.  Pregnancy health status of sub-Saharan refugee women who have resettled in developed countries: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mary Carolan
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 6.  Preterm birth: risk factor for early-onset chronic diseases.

Authors:  Thuy Mai Luu; Sherri L Katz; Paul Leeson; Bernard Thébaud; Anne-Monique Nuyt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  The cost effectiveness of prenatal care.

Authors:  J W Henderson
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1994

8.  Migration and preterm birth in war refugees: a Swedish cohort study.

Authors:  Can Liu; Marcelo Urquia; Sven Cnattingius; Anders Hjern
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 8.082

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  A Qualitative Evaluation of a Mother and Child Center Providing Psychosocial Support to Newly Arrived Female Refugees in a Registration and Reception Center in Germany.

Authors:  Catharina Zehetmair; David Kindermann; Inga Tegeler; Cassandra Derreza-Greeven; Anna Cranz; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Christoph Nikendei
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Bibliometric analysis of global migration health research in peer-reviewed literature (2000-2016).

Authors:  Waleed M Sweileh; Kolitha Wickramage; Kevin Pottie; Charles Hui; Bayard Roberts; Ansam F Sawalha; Saed H Zyoud
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes in Immigrants From Conflict-Zone Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Samira Behboudi-Gandevani; Razieh Bidhendi-Yarandi; Mohammad Hossein Panahi; Abbas Mardani; Christina Prinds; Mojtaba Vaismoradi
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-11

4.  Preeclampsia by maternal reasons for immigration: a population-based study.

Authors:  Roy M Nilsen; Eline S Vik; Svein A Rasmussen; Rhonda Small; Dag Moster; Erica Schytt; Vigdis Aasheim
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Access to community-based reproductive health services and incidence of low birthweight delivery among refugee and displaced mothers: a retrospective study in the Thailand-Myanmar border region.

Authors:  Sudheesha Perera; Cynthia Maung; Sophia Hla; Hsa Moo Moo; Saw Than Lwin; Catherine Bruck; Terrence Smith; Menno Bakker; Cassim Akhoon; Indra Neil Sarkar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.