Literature DB >> 28867732

Comparison between Antiemetic Effects of Palonosetron and Granisetron on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Japanese Patients Treated with R-CHOP.

Mayako Uchida1,2, Yasuo Mori3, Tsutomu Nakamura2, Koji Kato3, Kenjiro Kamezaki3, Katsuto Takenaka3, Motoaki Shiratsuchi4, Kaori Kadoyama2, Toshihiro Miyamoto3, Koichi Akashi3.   

Abstract

In the present study, the antiemetic effect of palonosetron, not combined with dexamethasone and aprepitant, on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting was evaluated in patients with malignant lymphoma receiving first-line rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy, and was compared to that of granisetron. A total of 74 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included in this study (April 2007 to December 2015). Palonosetron (0.75 mg) or granisetron (3 mg) was intravenously administered before R-CHOP therapy. The proportions of patients with complete response (CR) during the overall (0-120 h after the start of R-CHOP therapy), acute (0-24 h) and delayed (24-120 h) phases were evaluated. CR was defined as no vomiting and no use of antiemetic rescue medication. A total of 32 and 42 patients were treated with palonosetron and granisetron, respectively. The CR rate in the palonosetron group was significantly higher than that in the granisetron group during the delayed phase (90.6 and 61.9%, respectively; p=0.007). Logistic regression analysis showed that use of palonosetron improved the CR rate during the delayed phase, compared to use of granisetron. Female sex, age less than 60 years, no habitual alcohol intake, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) score of 1 were significant risk factors associated with non-CR. The findings of this study suggested the superiority of palonosetron to granisetron, without accompanying dexamethasone and aprepitant, for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with malignant lymphoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting; complete response; delayed phase; granisetron; palonosetron

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28867732     DOI: 10.1248/bpb.b17-00318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Pharm Bull        ISSN: 0918-6158            Impact factor:   2.233


  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness of palonosetron versus granisetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Hsu; Ching-Yao Chen; Ka-Wai Tam; Chin-Yu Hsu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Antiemetic efficacy and safety of granisetron or palonosetron alone and in combination with a corticosteroid for ABVD therapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Mayako Uchida; Tsutomu Nakamura; Kojiro Hata; Hiroyuki Watanabe; Yasuo Mori; Koji Kato; Kenjiro Kamezaki; Katsuto Takenaka; Motoaki Shiratsuchi; Keiko Hosohata; Toshihiro Miyamoto; Koichi Akashi
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2018-01-09

3.  Patient-Related Risk Factors for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa; A Mosharraf Hossain; Beau James Lavoie; Illhoi Yoo
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.810

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.