Literature DB >> 28866874

Two-site evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the Sysmex XN Body Fluid (BF) module for cell count and differential in Cerebrospinal Fluid.

S Buoro1, B Peruzzi2, A Fanelli2, M Seghezzi1, B Manenti1, M Lorubbio2, T Biagioli2, S Nannini2, C Ottomano3, G Lippi4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cellular analysis in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) provides important diagnostic information in many pathological settings. The aim of this two-site study was to evaluate the Sysmex XN Body Fluid mode (XN-BF) for cell analysis of CSF compared to light microscopy (LM).
METHODS: Two hundred and seven consecutive CSF samples were analyzed in parallel with XN-BF and LM. The study also included the estimation of the limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), limit of quantitation (LoQ), carry-over and linearity of XN-BF module.
RESULTS: LoQ of white blood cells (WBC) was 3×106  cells/L; linearity was good and carry-over negligible. XN-BF parameters were compared to LM for the following cell classes: total cells, WBC, polymorphonuclear (PMN), and mononuclear (MN) cells. The bias ranged from 1.3 to 15.2×106  cells/L. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis for WBC showed an area under the curve of 0.98, and the global diagnostic agreement was 95% at a cutoff of 5×106  cells/L.
CONCLUSIONS: XN-BF provides rapid and accurate counts in clinically relevant ranges of CSF values, thus providing a valuable alternative to conventional LM analysis. However, microscopic review remains advisable in samples with abnormal cell counts or high fluorescent (HF-BF) cell parameter exceeding 5×106  cells/L.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990XNzzm321990; Sysmex; automated cell count; body fluid; cerebrospinal fluid

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28866874     DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol        ISSN: 1751-5521            Impact factor:   2.877


  4 in total

Review 1.  Technological features of blast identification in the cerebrospinal fluid: A systematic review of flow cytometry and laboratory haematology methods.

Authors:  John L Frater; Cara Lunn Shirai; Jonathan R Brestoff
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.450

2.  A comparison of the analysis of 3 types of body fluids using the XN-350 hematology analyzer versus light microscopy assessment.

Authors:  Jiwon Lee; Younggeun Cho; Han-Sung Kim; Hee Jung Kang; Miyoung Kim; Young Kyung Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Automated Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Cells Using Commercially Available Blood Cell Analysis Devices-A Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Manfred Wick; Catharina C Gross; Hayrettin Tumani; Brigitte Wildemann; Martin Stangel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Double-filtered leukoreduction as a method for risk reduction of transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  Sejong Chun; Minh-Trang Thi Phan; Saetbyul Hong; Jehoon Yang; Yeup Yoon; Sangbin Han; Jungwon Kang; Mark H Yazer; Jaehyun Kim; Duck Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.