| Literature DB >> 28866819 |
Esmee I M L Liem1, Joyce Baard2, Evelyne C C Cauberg2, Mieke T J Bus2, D Martijn de Bruin2,3, M Pilar Laguna Pes2, Jean J M C H de la Rosette2, Theo M de Reijke2.
Abstract
A significant number of patients with intermediate- or high-risk bladder cancer treated with intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy are non-responders to this treatment. Since we cannot predict in which patients BCG therapy will fail, markers for responders are needed. UroVysion® is a multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test for bladder cancer detection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether FISH can be used to early identify recurrence during treatment with BCG. In a multicenter, prospective study, three bladder washouts at different time points during treatment (t 0 = week 0, pre-BCG, t 1 = 6 weeks following TURB, t 2 = 3 months following TURB) were collected for FISH from patients with bladder cancer treated with BCG between 2008 and 2013. Data on bladder cancer recurrence and duration of BCG maintenance therapy were recorded. Thirty-six (31.6%) out of 114 patients developed a recurrence after a median of 6 months (range 2-32). No significant association was found between a positive FISH test at t 0 or t 1 and risk of recurrence (p = 0.79 and p = 0.29). A positive t 2 FISH test was associated with a higher risk of recurrence (p = 0.001). Patients with a positive FISH test 3 months following TURB had a 4.0-4.6 times greater risk of developing a recurrence compared to patients with a negative FISH. Patients with a positive FISH test 3 months following TURB and induction BCG therapy have a higher risk of developing tumor recurrence. FISH can therefore be a useful additional tool for physicians when determining a treatment strategy.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG); Biomarker; Bladder cancer; Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); Non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC); Recurrence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28866819 PMCID: PMC5581817 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-1033-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Oncol ISSN: 1357-0560 Impact factor: 3.064
Patient characteristics
|
| % | |
|---|---|---|
| Patients ( | 114 | |
| Male ( | 88 | 77.2% |
| Female ( | 26 | 22.8% |
| Mean age (years, range) | 70.7 | 42–94 |
| Median follow-up (months, range) | 23 | 2–32 |
| History of bladder cancer ( | 34 | 29.8% |
| Previous intravesical treatment ( | 15 | 13.2% |
| Mitomycin C | 8 | |
| BCG | 7 |
BCG Bacillus Calmette–Guérin
Tumor characteristics
|
| % | |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor stage | ||
| CIS only | 23 | 20.2 |
| Ta | 43 | 37.7 |
| T1 | 48 | 42.1 |
| Tumor grade | ||
| CIS only | 23 | 20.2 |
| G1 | 6 | 5.3 |
| G2 | 7 | 6.1 |
| G2 + CIS | 4 | 3.5 |
| G3 | 57 | 50.0 |
| G3 + CIS | 17 | 14.9 |
| Intermediate risk | 7* | 6.2 |
| High risk | 105* | 93.8 |
| Single tumors | 42 | 36.8 |
| Multifocal | 72 | 63.2 |
CIS carcinoma in situ
* Two patients could not be classified, because information regarding tumor size was missing
Recurrence during 24-month follow-up
| CIS only | G1 | G2 | G3 | G3 + CIS | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIS only | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Ta | 0 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 15 |
| T1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 8 |
| T2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Total | 9 | 5 | 6 | 12 | 4 | 36 |
Fig. 1Flowchart showing patient inclusion and exclusion
Fig. 2Recurrence-free survival curves of t 0, t 1 and t 2 and hazard curve of t 2, corrected for possible confounding. a Kaplan–Meier curve of patients with a positive FISH test versus negative FISH test pre-BCG (t 0). b Kaplan–Meier curve of patients with a positive FISH test versus a negative FISH test post-BCG induction at 6 weeks (t 1). c Kaplan–Meier curve of patients with a positive FISH test versus negative FISH test post-BCG at 3 months (t 2). d Hazard curve of t 2, corrected for immediate postoperative instillation, repeat TURB and number of BCG maintenance instillations
Evaluation of UroVysion® FISH at t 0, t 1 and t 2
|
| ||||
| Recurrence during FU | Sens = 0.44 (16/36) | |||
| FISH at | Yes | No | Total | Spec = 0.59 (46/78) |
| Positive | 16 | 32 | 48 | PPV = 0.33 (16/48) |
| Negative | 20 | 46 | 66 | NPV = 0.70 (46/66) |
| Total | 36 | 78 | 114 | Acc = 0.54 ((16 + 46)/114) |
FU follow-up, Sens sensitivity, Spec specificity, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, Acc accuracy