Literature DB >> 28866507

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: A Theoretical Framework for the Assessment of Continuous Colormaps.

Roxana Bujack, Terece L Turton, Francesca Samsel, Colin Ware, David H Rogers, James Ahrens.   

Abstract

A myriad of design rules for what constitutes a "good" colormap can be found in the literature. Some common rules include order, uniformity, and high discriminative power. However, the meaning of many of these terms is often ambiguous or open to interpretation. At times, different authors may use the same term to describe different concepts or the same rule is described by varying nomenclature. These ambiguities stand in the way of collaborative work, the design of experiments to assess the characteristics of colormaps, and automated colormap generation. In this paper, we review current and historical guidelines for colormap design. We propose a specified taxonomy and provide unambiguous mathematical definitions for the most common design rules.

Year:  2017        PMID: 28866507     DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2743978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph        ISSN: 1077-2626            Impact factor:   4.579


  4 in total

1.  Optimizing colormaps with consideration for color vision deficiency to enable accurate interpretation of scientific data.

Authors:  Jamie R Nuñez; Christopher R Anderton; Ryan S Renslow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Quantum core affect. Color-emotion structure of semantic atom.

Authors:  Ilya A Surov
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-28

3.  The Metabolic Rainbow: Deep Learning Phase I Metabolism in Five Colors.

Authors:  Na Le Dang; Matthew K Matlock; Tyler B Hughes; S Joshua Swamidass
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  The relation between color and spatial structure for interpreting colormap data visualizations.

Authors:  Shannon C Sibrel; Ragini Rathore; Laurent Lessard; Karen B Schloss
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.