Literature DB >> 28866300

Action observation effects reflect the modular organization of the human motor system.

Pauline M Hilt1, Eleonora Bartoli2, Elisabetta Ferrari3, Marco Jacono3, Luciano Fadiga4, Alessandro D'Ausilio5.   

Abstract

Action observation, similarly to action execution, facilitates the observer's motor system and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has been instrumental in exploring the nature of these motor activities. However, contradictory findings question some of the fundamental assumptions regarding the neural computations run by the Action Observation Network (AON). To better understand this issue, we delivered TMS over the observers' motor cortex at two timings of two reaching-grasping actions (precision vs power grip) and we recorded Motor-Evoked Potentials (4 hand/arm muscles; MEPs). At the same time, we also recorded whole-hand TMS Evoked Kinematics (8 hand elevation angles; MEKs) that capture the global functional motor output, as opposed to the limited view offered by recording few muscles. By repeating the same protocol twice, and a third time after continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the motor cortex, we observe significant time-dependent grip-specific MEPs and MEKs modulations, that disappeared after cTBS. MEKs, differently from MEPs, exhibit a consistent significant modulation across pre-cTBS sessions. Beside clear methodological implications, the multidimensionality of MEKs opens a window on muscle synergies needed to overcome system redundancy. By providing better access to the AON computations, our results strengthen the idea that action observation shares key organizational similarities with action execution.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action observation; Kinematic; Modularity; Motor cortex; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28866300     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  7 in total

1.  Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study.

Authors:  B Rauchbauer; C Lorenz; C Lamm; D M Pfabigan
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Spatial frequency tuning of motor responses reveals differential contribution of dorsal and ventral systems to action comprehension.

Authors:  Lucia Amoruso; Alessandra Finisguerra; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Observing Without Acting: A Balance of Excitation and Suppression in the Human Corticospinal Pathway?

Authors:  Ricci Hannah; Lorenzo Rocchi; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Low or High-Level Motor Coding? The Role of Stimulus Complexity.

Authors:  Lucia Amoruso; Alessandra Finisguerra
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Action observation treatment-based exoskeleton (AOT-EXO) for upper extremity after stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zejian Chen; Nan Xia; Chang He; Minghui Gu; Jiang Xu; Xiaohua Han; Xiaolin Huang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Motor Recruitment during Action Observation: Effect of Interindividual Differences in Action Strategy.

Authors:  P M Hilt; P Cardellicchio; E Dolfini; T Pozzo; L Fadiga; A D'Ausilio
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Motor system recruitment during action observation: No correlation between mu-rhythm desynchronization and corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Olivia M Lapenta; Elisabetta Ferrari; Paulo S Boggio; Luciano Fadiga; Alessandro D'Ausilio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.