Matthew C Ward1, Nadeem Riaz2, Jimmy J Caudell3, Neal E Dunlap4, Derek Isrow5, Sara J Zakem6, Joshua Dault7, Musaddiq J Awan6, John A Vargo8, Dwight E Heron8, Kristin A Higgins9, Jonathan J Beitler9, Samuel Marcrom10, Drexell H Boggs10, Comron Hassanzadeh11, Chandana A Reddy12, James A Bonner10, Min Yao6, Mitchell Machtay6, Farzan Siddiqui5, Andy M Trotti3, Nancy Y Lee2, Shlomo A Koyfman12. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: mward@sero.net. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio. 7. Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 9. Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 10. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama. 11. School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri. 12. Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The therapeutic ratio of reirradiation for recurrent or second primary (RSP) squamous carcinoma of the head and neck may be improved in the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era. However, patient selection for reirradiation remains challenging. We performed a multi-institution cohort study to investigate modern outcomes after IMRT-based reirradiation and to identify prognostic subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with RSP squamous carcinoma originating in a previously irradiated field (≥40 Gy) who underwent reirradiation with IMRT (≥40 Gy re-IMRT) were included. Locoregional failure and late toxicity were calculated using the Gray competing risk method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). Factors associated with OS were entered into a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) for OS. RESULTS: From 7 institutions, 412 patients were included. The median dose of re-IMRT was 60 Gy, and the median time between RT courses was 2.4 years. Chemotherapy was used in 76% of patients. The rates of grade ≥3, grade ≥4, and grade 5 acute toxicities were 19%, 4.4%, and 1.2%, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicity adjusted for the competing risks of recurrence or death was 14.2%. RPA identified 3 prognostic subgroups with distinct and homogenous OS (P<.001): class I included patients >2 years from their initial course of RT with resected tumors (2-year OS, 61.9%); class II included patients >2 years with unresected tumors or those ≤2 years and without feeding tube or tracheostomy dependence (2-year OS, 40.0%), and the remaining patients formed class III (2-year OS, 16.8%). Fifty-nine percent of class III patients underwent postoperative re-irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: This study informs outcomes and expectations with IMRT-based reirradiation. The RPA classification identifies 3 distinct subgroups, which can guide patient selection for therapy and clinical trial design. RPA class III patients are not ideal candidates for protracted chemoradiation regardless of resection status.
PURPOSE: The therapeutic ratio of reirradiation for recurrent or second primary (RSP) squamous carcinoma of the head and neck may be improved in the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era. However, patient selection for reirradiation remains challenging. We performed a multi-institution cohort study to investigate modern outcomes after IMRT-based reirradiation and to identify prognostic subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with RSP squamous carcinoma originating in a previously irradiated field (≥40 Gy) who underwent reirradiation with IMRT (≥40 Gy re-IMRT) were included. Locoregional failure and late toxicity were calculated using the Gray competing risk method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). Factors associated with OS were entered into a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) for OS. RESULTS: From 7 institutions, 412 patients were included. The median dose of re-IMRT was 60 Gy, and the median time between RT courses was 2.4 years. Chemotherapy was used in 76% of patients. The rates of grade ≥3, grade ≥4, and grade 5 acute toxicities were 19%, 4.4%, and 1.2%, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicity adjusted for the competing risks of recurrence or death was 14.2%. RPA identified 3 prognostic subgroups with distinct and homogenous OS (P<.001): class I included patients >2 years from their initial course of RT with resected tumors (2-year OS, 61.9%); class II included patients >2 years with unresected tumors or those ≤2 years and without feeding tube or tracheostomy dependence (2-year OS, 40.0%), and the remaining patients formed class III (2-year OS, 16.8%). Fifty-nine percent of class III patients underwent postoperative re-irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: This study informs outcomes and expectations with IMRT-based reirradiation. The RPA classification identifies 3 distinct subgroups, which can guide patient selection for therapy and clinical trial design. RPA class III patients are not ideal candidates for protracted chemoradiation regardless of resection status.
Authors: Kevin S Choe; Daniel J Haraf; Abhishek Solanki; Ezra E W Cohen; Tanguy Y Seiwert; Kerstin M Stenson; Elizabeth A Blair; Louis Portugal; Victoria M Villaflor; Mary Ellyn Witt; Everett E Vokes; Joseph K Salama Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-06-13 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Sharon A Spencer; Jonathan Harris; Richard H Wheeler; Mitchell Machtay; Christopher Schultz; William Spanos; Marvin Rotman; Ruby Meredith; Kie-Kian Ang Journal: Head Neck Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Nadeem Riaz; Julian C Hong; Eric J Sherman; Luc Morris; Matthew Fury; Ian Ganly; Tony J C Wang; Weji Shi; Suzanne L Wolden; Andrew Jackson; Richard J Wong; Zhigang Zhang; Shyam D Rao; Nancy Y Lee Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: John A Vargo; Matthew C Ward; Jimmy J Caudell; Nadeem Riaz; Neal E Dunlap; Derek Isrow; Sara J Zakem; Joshua Dault; Musaddiq J Awan; Kristin A Higgins; Comron Hassanadeh; Jonathan J Beitler; Chandana A Reddy; Samuel Marcrom; Drexell H Boggs; James A Bonner; Min Yao; Mitchell Machtay; Farzan Siddiqui; Andy M Trotti; Nancy Y Lee; Shlomo A Koyfman; Robert L Ferris; Dwight E Heron Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: R De Crevoisier; J Bourhis; C Domenge; P Wibault; S Koscielny; A Lusinchi; G Mamelle; F Janot; M Julieron; A M Leridant; P Marandas; J P Armand; G Schwaab; B Luboinski; F Eschwege Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Erik P Sulman; David L Schwartz; Thuy T Le; K Kian Ang; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; Anesa Ahamad; Merril Kies; Bonnie Glisson; Randal Weber; Adam S Garden Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-06-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: David J Adelstein; Yi Li; George L Adams; Henry Wagner; Julie A Kish; John F Ensley; David E Schuller; Arlene A Forastiere Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mischa de Ridder; Pieter D de Veij Mestdagh; Joris B W Elbers; Arash Navran; Charlotte L Zuur; Ludi E Smeele; Abrahim Al-Mamgani Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Christopher P Cifarelli; John A Vargo; Wei Fang; Roman Liscak; Khumar Guseynova; Ronald E Warnick; Cheng-Chia Lee; Huai-Che Yang; Hamid Borghei-Razavi; Tonmoy Maiti; Zaid A Siddiqui; Justin C Yuan; Inga S Grills; David Mathieu; Charles J Touchette; Diogo Cordeiro; Veronica Chiang; Judith Hess; Christopher J Tien; Andrew Faramand; Hideyuki Kano; Gene H Barnett; Jason P Sheehan; L Dade Lunsford Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Molly E Heft Neal; Julia Brennan; Catherine T Haring; J Chad Brenner; Francis Worden; Paul Swiecicki; Michelle Mierzwa; Keith A Casper; Kelly M Malloy; Chaz L Stucken; Scott A McLean; Mark E Prince; Carol R Bradford; Gregory T Wolf; Andrew G Shuman; Steven B Chinn; Douglas B Chepeha; Andrew J Rosko; Matthew E Spector Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: J Boustani; A Ruffier; A Moya-Plana; Y Tao; F Nguyen; C Even; C Berthold; O Casiraghi; S Temam; P Blanchard Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Jimmy J Caudell; Matthew C Ward; Nadeem Riaz; Sara J Zakem; Musaddiq J Awan; Neal E Dunlap; Derek Isrow; Comron Hassanzadeh; John A Vargo; Dwight E Heron; Samuel Marcrom; Drexell H Boggs; Chandana A Reddy; Joshua Dault; James A Bonner; Kristin A Higgins; Jonathan J Beitler; Shlomo A Koyfman; Mitchell Machtay; Min Yao; Andy M Trotti; Farzan Siddiqui; Nancy Y Lee Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Muhammad Shahid Iqbal; Nick West; Neil Richmond; Josef Kovarik; Isabel Gray; Nick Willis; David Morgan; Gozde Yazici; Mustafa Cengiz; Vinidh Paleri; Charles Kelly Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Mauricio E Gamez; Samir H Patel; Lisa A McGee; Terence T Sio; Mark McDonald; Jack Phan; Daniel J Ma; Robert L Foote; Jean-Claude M Rwigema Journal: Int J Part Ther Date: 2021-06-25