Literature DB >> 28865902

Immediate Auditory Feedback is Superior to Other Types of Feedback for Basic Surgical Skills Acquisition.

Mohammed J Al Fayyadh1, Ramy A Hassan2, Zachary K Tran2, Jason W Kempenich2, Leonid Bunegin3, Daniel L Dent2, Ross E Willis2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of timing and type of feedback on medical students' knot-tying performance using visual versus auditory and immediate versus delayed feedback. We hypothesized that participants who received immediate auditory feedback would outperform those who received delayed and visual feedback.
METHODS: Sixty-nine first- and second-year medical students were taught to tie 2-handed knots. All participants completed 3 pretest knot-tying trials without feedback. Participants were instructed to tie a knot sufficiently tight to stop the "blood" flow while minimizing the amount of force applied to the vessel. Task completion time was not a criterion. Participants were stratified and randomly assigned to 5 experimental groups based on type (auditory versus visual) and timing (immediate versus delayed) of feedback. The control group did not receive feedback. All groups trained to proficiency. Participants completed 3 posttest trials without feedback.
RESULTS: There were fewer trials with leak (p < 0.01) and less force applied (p < 0.01) on the posttest compared to the pretest, regardless of study group. The immediate auditory feedback group required fewer trials to achieve proficiency than each of the other groups (p < 0.01) and had fewer leaks than the control, delayed auditory, and delayed visual groups (p < 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: In a surgical force feedback simulation model, immediate auditory feedback resulted in fewer training trials to reach proficiency and fewer leaks compared to visual and delayed forms of feedback.
Copyright © 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Systems-Based Practice; auditory; delayed; force feedback; immediate; surgical education; surgical skills; visual

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28865902     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  2 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Feedback in Improving the Knowledge, Attitudes and Skills of Medical Students: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Margareth Alves Bastos E Castro; Regina Lúcia Muniz de Almeida; Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti; Sandra Helena Cerrato Tibiriçá; Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel; Giancarlo Lucchetti
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-10-18

2.  Virtual classroom proficiency-based progression for robotic surgery training (VROBOT): a randomised, prospective, cross-over, effectiveness study.

Authors:  Arjun Nathan; Sonam Patel; Maria Georgi; Monty Fricker; Aqua Asif; Alexander Ng; William Mullins; Man Kien Hang; Alexander Light; Senthil Nathan; Nader Francis; John Kelly; Justin Collins; Ashwin Sridhar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-10-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.