Literature DB >> 28865889

Regional Variation in Utilization, In-hospital Mortality, and Health-Care Resource Use of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the United States.

Tanush Gupta1, Ankur Kalra2, Dhaval Kolte3, Sahil Khera4, Pedro A Villablanca5, Kashish Goel6, Anna E Bortnick1, Wilbert S Aronow7, Julio A Panza7, Neal S Kleiman8, J Dawn Abbott3, David P Slovut1, Cynthia C Taub1, Gregg C Fonarow9, Michael J Reardon8, Charanjit S Rihal6, Mario J Garcia1, Deepak L Bhatt10.   

Abstract

We queried the National Inpatient Sample database from 2012 to 2014 to identify all patients aged ≥18 years undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in the United States. Regional differences in TAVI utilization, in-hospital mortality, and health-care resource use were analyzed. Of 41,025 TAVI procedures in the United States between 2012 and 2014, 10,390 were performed in the Northeast, 9,090 in the Midwest, 14,095 in the South, and 7,450 in the West. Overall, the number of TAVI implants per million adults increased from 24.8 in 2012 to 63.2 in 2014. The utilization of TAVI increased during the study period in all 4 geographic regions, with the number of implants per million adults being highest in the Northeast, followed by the Midwest, South, and West, respectively. Overall in-hospital mortality was 4.2%. Compared with the Northeast, risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality was higher in the Midwest (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.26 [1.07 to 1.48]) and the South (aOR 1.61 [1.40 to 1.85]) and similar in the West (aOR 1.00 [0.84 to 1.18]). Average length of stay was shorter in all other regions compared with the Northeast. Among patients surviving to discharge, disposition to a skilled nursing facility or home health care was most common in the Northeast, whereas home discharge was most common in the West. Average hospital costs were highest in the West. In conclusion, we observed significant regional differences in TAVI utilization, in-hospital mortality, and health-care resource use in the United States. The findings of our study may have important policy implications and should provide an impetus to understand the source of this regional variation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28865889     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  The Devoted Grandma: Is a Social Indication for TAVR Acceptable?

Authors:  Andrea J Carpenter; William M Novick; Robert M Sade
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Utilization of Advanced Cardiovascular Therapies in the United States and Canada: An Observational Study of New York and Ontario Administrative Data.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Saket Girotra; John Matelski; Maria Koh; Bruce E Landon; Lu Han; Douglas S Lee; Dennis T Ko
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-01-20

3.  Demographic, Regional, and State-Level Trends of Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis in United States, 2008 to 2018.

Authors:  Safi U Khan; Ankur Kalra; Samir R Kapadia; Muhammad U Khan; Muhammad Zia Khan; Muhammad Shahzeb Khan; Mamas A Mamas; Haider J Warraich; Khurram Nasir; Erin D Michos; Mohamad Alkhouli
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Regional variation in the use of catheter ablation for patients with arrhythmia in Japan.

Authors:  Takahiro Inoue; Hiroyo Kuwabara
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-11-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.