Harmeet K Chiang1, Al M Best2, David C Sarrett3. 1. Department of General Practice, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: hkchiang@vcu.edu. 2. Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. 3. School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the concordance between clinical practice and published evidence by dental faculty and graduating students of the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry. METHODS: A questionnaire previously developed by the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network with 12 clinical scenarios was administered to VCU faculty and graduating students. Responses were scored as either consistent or inconsistent with published evidence and then analyzed for differences between dental faculty, graduating students, and the national results. RESULTS: There were 43 dental faculty members with at least half-time student contact who responded to the survey. Faculty concordance ranged from 33% to 100%, and general practice faculty had the highest concordance (82%). Eighty-five of the graduating class of 98 responded to the survey, and student concordance ranged from 18% to 92% and averaged 67%. General practice faculty had higher concordance with published evidence than recently graduated dental students. CONCLUSIONS: Graduating students and dental faculty demonstrated higher concordance with evidence-based practice than practitioners in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. General practice dental faculty demonstrated adequate concordance, but students demonstrated only a medium-level concordance. Practitioners involved in teaching dental students are better able to keep up with evolving evidence and are better able to demonstrate evidence-based practice.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the concordance between clinical practice and published evidence by dental faculty and graduating students of the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry. METHODS: A questionnaire previously developed by the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network with 12 clinical scenarios was administered to VCU faculty and graduating students. Responses were scored as either consistent or inconsistent with published evidence and then analyzed for differences between dental faculty, graduating students, and the national results. RESULTS: There were 43 dental faculty members with at least half-time student contact who responded to the survey. Faculty concordance ranged from 33% to 100%, and general practice faculty had the highest concordance (82%). Eighty-five of the graduating class of 98 responded to the survey, and student concordance ranged from 18% to 92% and averaged 67%. General practice faculty had higher concordance with published evidence than recently graduated dental students. CONCLUSIONS: Graduating students and dental faculty demonstrated higher concordance with evidence-based practice than practitioners in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. General practice dental faculty demonstrated adequate concordance, but students demonstrated only a medium-level concordance. Practitioners involved in teaching dental students are better able to keep up with evolving evidence and are better able to demonstrate evidence-based practice.
Authors: Mark S Litaker; Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski; D Brad Rindal; Jeffrey L Fellows; Marc W Heft; Cyril Meyerowitz; Sidney Chonowski; Gregg H Gilbert Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 2.757