Literature DB >> 28865756

Curvilinear relationship between age and assisted reproduction technique success: retrospective analyses of US National ART Surveillance System data from 2010-2014.

Yalcin Yavas1.   

Abstract

In assisted reproduction technique cycles using fresh autologous embryos, the pattern by which outcomes per started cycle (live birth and clinical pregnancy) and per clinical pregnancy (live birth and miscarriage) change with age was determined. A dataset was created with 488,351 cycles. Success rates changed with age following well-fitted, ∩-shaped curvilinear (quadratic, cubic, quartic) regressions. These rates increased steadily from age <24-28 years (P = 0.001; P = 0.02; P = 0.04; respectively) with positive slopes (P ≤ 0.03); live birth and pregnancy rates per cycle were lower in women aged <25 years versus women aged 25-28 years (P = 0.0002; P = 0.01, respectively), and declined steadily thereafter with negative slopes (P < 0.0001). The initial increase occurred at decreasing rates; subsequent decline occurred at increasing rates. Women aged <29 years with successful outcomes were older than those who were unsuccessful (P = 0.001; P = 0.04; P = 0.001; respectively); those with successful outcomes were younger in other age groups (P < 0.0001). Miscarriage followed similar but reverse ∪-shaped curvilinear regressions. Age-driven decline in success rates begins <30 years and occurs at increasing rates, suggesting that women >30 years old with infertility should not delay assisted reproduction, if it is their only option.
Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Assisted reproductive technology; IVF; Live birth; Mathematical model; NASS

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28865756     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  3 in total

1.  Vasodilators for women undergoing fertility treatment.

Authors:  Rosa B Gutarra-Vilchez; Xavier Bonfill Cosp; Demián Glujovsky; Andres Viteri-García; Fernando M Runzer-Colmenares; Maria José Martinez-Zapata
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-12

Review 2.  Ethnicity/Race and Age-Specific Variations of Serum AMH in Women-A Review.

Authors:  Alexander M Kotlyar; David B Seifer
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Pregnancy and Fertility Concerns: A Survey of United States Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.

Authors:  Kaia M Schwartz; Caitlin E Martin; Heather S Hipp; Jennifer F Kawwass
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-11-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.