Literature DB >> 28865552

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger increases the number of oocytes and embryos available for cryopreservation in cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation.

Nigel Pereira1, Amelia G Kelly2, Logan D Stone3, Justine D Witzke3, Jovana P Lekovich3, Rony T Elias3, Glenn L Schattman3, Zev Rosenwaks3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the oocyte and embryo yield associated with GnRH-agonist triggers vs. hCG triggers in cancer patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for fertilization preservation.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic center. PATIENT(S): Cancer patients undergoing COS with letrozole and gonadotropins or gonadotropin-only protocols for oocyte or embryo cryopreservation. INTERVENTION(S): Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or hCG trigger. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes or two-pronuclei (2PN) embryos available for cryopreservation were primary outcomes. Separate multivariate linear regression models were used to assess the effect of trigger type on the primary outcomes, after controlling for confounders of interest. RESULT(S): A total of 341 patients were included, 99 (29.0%) in the GnRH-agonist group and 242 (71%) in the hCG group. There was no difference in the baseline demographics of patients receiving GnRH-agonist or hCG triggers. Within the letrozole and gonadotropins group (n = 269), the number (mean ± SD, 11.8 ± 5.8 vs. 9.9 ± 6.0) and percentage of MII oocytes (89.6% vs. 73.0%) available for cryopreservation was higher with GnRH-agonist triggers compared with hCG triggers. Similar results were noted with GnRH-agonist triggers in the gonadotropin-only group (n = 72) (i.e., a higher number [13.3 ± 7.9 vs. 9.3 ± 6.0] and percentage of MII oocytes [85.7% vs. 72.8%] available for cryopreservation). Multivariate linear regression demonstrated approximately three more MII oocytes and 2PN embryos available for cryopreservation in the GnRH-agonist trigger group, irrespective of cancer and COS protocol type. CONCLUSION(S): Utilization of a GnRH-agonist trigger increases the number of MII oocytes and 2PN embryos available for cryopreservation in cancer patients undergoing COS for fertility preservation.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; GnRH-agonist trigger; cancer; fertility preservation; ovarian stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28865552     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  13 in total

1.  Specific protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  F Cavagna; A Pontes; M Cavagna; A Dzik; N F Donadio; R Portela; M T Nagai; L H Gebrim
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Does Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Affect the Decision to Pursue Fertility Preservation Options in Young Women with Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Angelena Crown; Shirin Muhsen; Emily C Zabor; Varadan Sevilimedu; Joanne Kelvin; Shari B Goldfarb; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  A call to action: unified clinical practice guidelines for oncofertility care.

Authors:  Jacqueline Sehring; Anisa Hussain; Lauren Grimm; Elisabeth Rosen; Jody Esguerra; Karine Matevossian; Erica Louden; Angeline Beltsos; Roohi Jeelani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 4.  Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4.

Authors:  Thor Haahr; Carlos Dosouto; Carlo Alviggi; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Efficacy and safety of controlled ovarian stimulation using GnRH antagonist protocols for emergency fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer-a prospective nationwide Swedish multicenter study.

Authors:  Anna Marklund; Sandra Eloranta; Ida Wikander; Margareta Laczna Kitlinski; Mikael Lood; Elizabeth Nedstrand; Ann Thurin-Kjellberg; Pu Zhang; Jonas Bergh; Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Zachary Walker; Andrea Lanes; Elizabeth Ginsburg
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Versus Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Triggering in Fertility Preservation Cycles.

Authors:  Einat Haikin Herzberger; Sabaa Knaneh; Hadar Amir; Adi Reches; Dalit Ben-Yosef; Yael Kalma; Foad Azem; Nivin Samara
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 8.  Novel Physiology and Definition of Poor Ovarian Response; Clinical Recommendations.

Authors:  Antoine Abu-Musa; Thor Haahr; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  The impact of letrozole administration on oocyte morphology in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation.

Authors:  Ludmila M N Bercaire; Mario Cavagna; Nilka F Donadio; Andressa R Rocha; Rafael Portela; Vanessa R Alves; Thamara B B Santos; Felipe Cavagna; Artur Dzik; Luiz H Gebrim; Eliana A P Nahas
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 10.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist ovulation trigger-beyond OHSS prevention.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Castillo; Thor Haahr; María Martínez-Moya; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.