Erica D Walker1, Jaime E Hart2, Petros Koutrakis3, Jennifer M Cavallari4, Trang VoPham5, Marcos Luna6, Francine Laden7. 1. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: edw266@mail.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. 3. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. 4. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, United States. 5. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. 6. Department of Geography, Salem State University, Salem, MA, United States. 7. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Urban sound levels are a ubiquitous environmental stressor and have been shown to be associated with a wide variety of health outcomes. While much is known about the predictors of A-weighted sound pressure levels in the urban environment, far less is known about other frequencies. OBJECTIVE: To develop a series of spatial-temporal sound models to predict A-weighted sound pressure levels, low, mid, and high frequency sound for Boston, Massachusetts. METHODS: Short-term sound levels were gathered at n = 400 sites from February 2015 - February 2016. Spatial and meteorological attributes at or near the sound monitoring site were obtained using publicly available data and a portable weather station. An elastic net variable selection technique was used to select predictors of A-weighted, low, mid, and high frequency sound. RESULTS: The final models for low, mid, high, and A-weighted sound levels explained 59 - 69% of the variability in each measure. Similar to other A-weighted models, our sound models included transportation related variables such as length of roads and bus lines in the surrounding area; distance to road and rail lines; traffic volume, vehicle mix, residential and commercial land use. However, frequency specific models highlighted additional predictors not included in the A-weighted model including temperature, vegetation, impervious surfaces, vehicle mix, and density of entertainment establishments and restaurants. CONCLUSIONS: Building spatial temporal models to characterize sound levels across the frequency spectrum using an elastic net approach can be a promising tool for noise exposure assessments within the urban soundscape. Models of sound's character may give us additional important sound exposure metrics to be utilized in epidemiological studies.
BACKGROUND: Urban sound levels are a ubiquitous environmental stressor and have been shown to be associated with a wide variety of health outcomes. While much is known about the predictors of A-weighted sound pressure levels in the urban environment, far less is known about other frequencies. OBJECTIVE: To develop a series of spatial-temporal sound models to predict A-weighted sound pressure levels, low, mid, and high frequency sound for Boston, Massachusetts. METHODS: Short-term sound levels were gathered at n = 400 sites from February 2015 - February 2016. Spatial and meteorological attributes at or near the sound monitoring site were obtained using publicly available data and a portable weather station. An elastic net variable selection technique was used to select predictors of A-weighted, low, mid, and high frequency sound. RESULTS: The final models for low, mid, high, and A-weighted sound levels explained 59 - 69% of the variability in each measure. Similar to other A-weighted models, our sound models included transportation related variables such as length of roads and bus lines in the surrounding area; distance to road and rail lines; traffic volume, vehicle mix, residential and commercial land use. However, frequency specific models highlighted additional predictors not included in the A-weighted model including temperature, vegetation, impervious surfaces, vehicle mix, and density of entertainment establishments and restaurants. CONCLUSIONS: Building spatial temporal models to characterize sound levels across the frequency spectrum using an elastic net approach can be a promising tool for noise exposure assessments within the urban soundscape. Models of sound's character may give us additional important sound exposure metrics to be utilized in epidemiological studies.
Authors: Fei Zuo; Ye Li; Steven Johnson; James Johnson; Sunil Varughese; Ray Copes; Fuan Liu; Hao Jiang Wu; Rebecca Hou; Hong Chen Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Erica D Walker; Anthony Brammer; Martin G Cherniack; Francine Laden; Jennifer M Cavallari Journal: Environ Res Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Artem Sokolov; Daniel E Carlin; Evan O Paull; Robert Baertsch; Joshua M Stuart Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Theo Bodin; Maria Albin; Jonas Ardö; Emilie Stroh; Per-Olof Ostergren; Jonas Björk Journal: Environ Health Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Sierra N Clark; Abosede S Alli; Ricky Nathvani; Allison Hughes; Majid Ezzati; Michael Brauer; Mireille B Toledano; Jill Baumgartner; James E Bennett; James Nimo; Josephine Bedford Moses; Solomon Baah; Samuel Agyei-Mensah; George Owusu; Briony Croft; Raphael E Arku Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 4.379