Literature DB >> 28865322

Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in patients with failed gamma knife surgery: Analysis of efficacy and safety.

Jian Cheng1, Wenke Liu1, Xuhui Hui1, Ding Lei1, Heng Zhang2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Though it is usually successful, failure or delayed pain recurrence may occur after gamma knife surgery (GKS) in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN), and additional intervention may be required. This study aimed to investigate whether the safety and efficacy of microvascular decompression (MVD) were influenced by prior GKS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively evaluated 36 consecutive TN patients who underwent MVD after failed GKS from January 2012 to June 2013. The clinical features, operative findings and surgical outcomes were reviewed and statistically analyzed, and the operation results were further compared with a cohort of 60 patients with no prior GKS.
RESULTS: At surgery, atrophy of the trigeminal nerve was observed in 13 patients (36.1%), arachnoid thickening in 6 patients (16.7%), adhesions between vessels and the trigeminal nerve in 8 patients (22.2%), and atherosclerotic plaque in the offending vessels in 3 patients (8.3%). The complete pain relief rates were 83.3% immediately after MVD and 72.2% at last follow-up, which showed no statistical difference when compared with patients without GKS. New or worsened facial numbness occurred in 7 patients (19.4%), which was significantly higher than those without GKS (p=0.02). Univariate analysis suggested that a positive pain response to the prior GKS correlated with better long-term outcome (p=0.015), and the existence of arachnoid adhesions correlated with higher risk of facial numbness (p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: MVD remains an appropriate and effective alternative therapy for patients with failed GKS, with no added technical difficulty. However, the risk of facial numbness seems to be higher than those with MVD alone.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gamma knife surgery; Microvascular decompression; Outcome; Recurrence; Trigeminal neuralgia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28865322     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  5 in total

1.  Pain Outcomes Following Microvascular Decompression for Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine Holste; Alvin Y Chan; John D Rolston; Dario J Englot
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Revision Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia and Hemifacial Spasm: Factors Associated with Surgical Failure.

Authors:  Kristine Ravina; Ben A Strickland; Robert C Rennert; Joshua Bakhsheshian; Jonathan J Russin; Steven L Giannotta
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-06-29

Review 3.  The leptomeninges as a critical organ for normal CNS development and function: First patient and public involved systematic review of arachnoiditis (chronic meningitis).

Authors:  Carol S Palackdkharry; Stephanie Wottrich; Erin Dienes; Mohamad Bydon; Michael P Steinmetz; Vincent C Traynelis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Treatment Outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia-A Systematic Review of Domains, Dimensions and Measures.

Authors:  Carolina Venda Nova; Joanna M Zakrzewska; Sarah R Baker; Richeal Ni Riordain
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-01-27

5.  Microvascular decompression as a second step treatment for trigeminal neuralgia in patients with failed two-isocentre gamma knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  Jia-Jing Wang; Zhen Zhao; Song-Shan Chai; Yi-Hao Wang; Wei Xiang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.042

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.