Literature DB >> 28864323

Contemporary Determinants of Delayed Benchmark Timelines in Acute Myocardial Infarction in Men and Women.

Hilmi Alnsasra1, Doron Zahger1, Diklah Geva2, Shlomi Matetzky2, Roy Beigel2, Zaza Iakobishvili3, Ronny Alcalai4, Shaul Atar5, Avi Shimony6.   

Abstract

Treatment delays in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are related to increased morbidity and mortality. Hence, identifying determinants of delay may help reduce time to treatment. Importantly, limited data suggest that there may be sex-related disparities in benchmark timelines. Although guidelines advocate the use of the first medical contact (FMC) rather than hospital admission as the moment from which delays to treatment should be monitored, the latter is still often used for quality purposes. We aimed to identify factors associated with treatment delays, with an emphasis on sex-related disparities. We reviewed data on 3,658 patients with AMI from 2 contemporary, consecutive multicenter surveys. Measured delays were FMC-to-electrocardiogram >10 minutes in ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and non-STEMI, FMC-to-primary percutaneous coronary intervention >90 minutes in STEMI, and invasive angiography >72 hours after admission in non-STEMI patients. Timely electrocardiogram was performed in 48% of patients with STEMI and in 39.8% of non-STEMI patients without significant sex-related differences. Independent determinants of delay included atypical chest pain (CP) and presentation during daytime. In patients with STEMI, 37.5% had primary percutaneous coronary intervention in less than 90 minutes without significant sex-related disparities. Independent determinants of delay included atypical CP, night presentation, and diabetes. In non-STEMI patients, independent determinants of delayed invasive approach were female sex, age >75 years, atypical CP, and renal failure. In conclusion, significant treatment delays in patients with AMI are still frequent in contemporary practice, highlighting the need for improvement and guidelines implementation. Predictors of delay identified in our study may facilitate targeting of interventions to improve adherence to guidelines.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28864323     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Update on Management of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women.

Authors:  Fabiana Lucà; Maurizio Giuseppe Abrignani; Iris Parrini; Stefania Angela Di Fusco; Simona Giubilato; Carmelo Massimiliano Rao; Laura Piccioni; Laura Cipolletta; Bruno Passaretti; Francesco Giallauria; Angelo Leone; Giuseppina Maura Francese; Carmine Riccio; Sandro Gelsomino; Furio Colivicchi; Michele Massimo Gulizia
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Reperfusion and Time to Presentation in Women: Too Little Too Late.

Authors:  Ashvin N Pande; Alice K Jacobs
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Six Months After the Patients Stayed Home: A Nationwide Study of Cardiac Mortality and Readmissions Following the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Malta.

Authors:  Neil Grech; Rachel A Xuereb; Robert G Xuereb; Maryanne Caruana
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-11

4.  Gender Disparities in Health Resource Utilization in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Xian Shen; Stefan DiMario; Kiran Philip
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.845

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.