Literature DB >> 28863291

Comparison of methods for determination of total oil sands-derived naphthenic acids in water samples.

Sarah A Hughes1, Rongfu Huang2, Ashley Mahaffey3, Pamela Chelme-Ayala2, Nikolaus Klamerth2, Mohamed N A Meshref2, Mohamed D Ibrahim2, Christine Brown4, Kerry M Peru5, John V Headley5, Mohamed Gamal El-Din2.   

Abstract

There are several established methods for the determination of naphthenic acids (NAs) in waters associated with oil sands mining operations. Due to their highly complex nature, measured concentration and composition of NAs vary depending on the method used. This study compared different common sample preparation techniques, analytical instrument methods, and analytical standards to measure NAs in groundwater and process water samples collected from an active oil sands operation. In general, the high- and ultrahigh-resolution methods, namely high performance liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-TOF-MS) and Orbitrap mass spectrometry (Orbitrap-MS), were within an order of magnitude of the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) methods. The gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) methods consistently had the highest NA concentrations and greatest standard error. Total NAs concentration was not statistically different between sample preparation of solid phase extraction and liquid-liquid extraction. Calibration standards influenced quantitation results. This work provided a comprehensive understanding of the inherent differences in the various techniques available to measure NAs and hence the potential differences in measured amounts of NAs in samples. Results from this study will contribute to the analytical method standardization for NA analysis in oil sands related water samples.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Groundwater; Naphthenic acids; Oil sands; Oil sands process-affected water

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28863291     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  2 in total

1.  Membrane Sampling Separates Naphthenic Acids from Biogenic Dissolved Organic Matter for Direct Analysis by Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Kyle D Duncan; Jeffrey A Hawkes; Mykelti Berg; Bas Clarijs; Chris G Gill; Jonas Bergquist; Ingela Lanekoff; Erik T Krogh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 2.  Naphthenic Acids: Formation, Role in Emulsion Stability, and Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry-Based Analytical Methods.

Authors:  Roselaine Facanali; Nathália de A Porto; Juliana Crucello; Rogerio M Carvalho; Boniek G Vaz; Leandro W Hantao
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.193

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.