Mousa A Al-Abbadi1, Sameera Q Shareef2, Mohammad M Yousef1, Nidal M Almasri3, Huda E Mustafa1,4,5, Hameed Aljawad3, Jassim A Ali2, Alan Groves1, Yasmen Alsaihati3. 1. Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. 2. King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. 3. Saad Specialist Hospital, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia. 4. Department of Pathology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. 5. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Internal Medicine, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This is a multicenter study which was conducted to evaluate the follow-up on thyroid aspirate cases with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular cells of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) and follicular neoplasm or suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN) using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytology (TBSRTC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The archival materials of all thyroid fine-needle aspirates over a 5-year period were retrieved from 3 institutions in the Arabian Gulf Region. All cytology slides and follow-up material for cases interpreted as AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN were reviewed. The revised diagnoses and follow-up were recorded. Analysis of risk of malignancy was calculated for the 2 entities. RESULTS: A total number of 2592 thyroid fine-needle aspirates were performed, out of which AUS/FLUS was found in 115 (4.4%) while FN/SFN in 39 (1.5%). Follow-up by surgery or repeat FNA was conducted on 42 (27%) and 10 (7%) patients on these 2 categories, respectively. The risk of malignancy was found to be 29% and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The risk of malignancy for AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN are 29% and 45%, respectively. This risk of malignancy in our study is on the higher range of that reported in the literature.
OBJECTIVE: This is a multicenter study which was conducted to evaluate the follow-up on thyroid aspirate cases with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular cells of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) and follicular neoplasm or suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN) using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytology (TBSRTC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The archival materials of all thyroid fine-needle aspirates over a 5-year period were retrieved from 3 institutions in the Arabian Gulf Region. All cytology slides and follow-up material for cases interpreted as AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN were reviewed. The revised diagnoses and follow-up were recorded. Analysis of risk of malignancy was calculated for the 2 entities. RESULTS: A total number of 2592 thyroid fine-needle aspirates were performed, out of which AUS/FLUS was found in 115 (4.4%) while FN/SFN in 39 (1.5%). Follow-up by surgery or repeat FNA was conducted on 42 (27%) and 10 (7%) patients on these 2 categories, respectively. The risk of malignancy was found to be 29% and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The risk of malignancy for AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN are 29% and 45%, respectively. This risk of malignancy in our study is on the higher range of that reported in the literature.