| Literature DB >> 28862175 |
Vandana Rai1, Upendra Yadav1, Pradeep Kumar1, Sushil K Yadav1, Sanjay Gupta2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28862175 PMCID: PMC5663157 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_745_14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Med Res ISSN: 0971-5916 Impact factor: 2.375
Fig. 1Flow diagram showing selection of studies.
Details of included studied (n=19)
Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase A1298C genotypes and allele number for cases and controls in all included studies
Pooled odds ratio of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase A1298C in different allele and genotype contrasts, P value of Q-test, the I2 metric and P value of Egger test in all included studies
Fig. 2Random effect forest plot showing a significant association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) A1298C polymorphism and risk of schizophrenia using allele contrast model.
Fig. 3Fixed effect forest plot showing a significant association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) A1298C polymorphism and risk of schizophrenia using homozygote model. Only 18 studies that had homozygous mutants were included.
Fig. 4Forest plots (random effect) showing no association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase A1298C polymorphism and risk of schizophrenia using dominant model (CC+AC vs. AA).
Fig. 5(A) Funnel plot of precision by log odds ratio (allele contrast model); (B) Funnel plot of standard error by log odds ratio (allele contrast model); (C) Funnel plot of precision by log odds ratio (homozygote model); (D) Funnel plot of standard error by log odds ratio (homozygote model); (E) Funnel plot of precision by log odds ratio (dominant model); (F) Funnel plot of standard error by log odds ratio (dominant model).