Literature DB >> 28861930

Electrical pulse stimulation: an in vitro exercise model for the induction of human skeletal muscle cell hypertrophy. A proof-of-concept study.

Janelle Tarum1, Mattias Folkesson1, Philip J Atherton2, Fawzi Kadi1.   

Abstract

NEW
FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Is electrical pulse stimulation (EPS) an in vitro exercise model able to elicit the hypertrophy of human muscle cells? What is the main finding and its importance? The addition of a restitution period of 8 h after EPS induces the enlargement of human muscle cells, a major physiological end-point to resistance exercise. This is supported by downregulation of myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle mass, and increased phosphorylated mTOR and 4E-BP1, key factors in the growth cascade. This proof-of-concept study provides a model of physiologically mediated muscle growth, which will be the basis for future studies aiming to depict molecular events governing the hypertrophy of human muscle cells. Electrical pulse stimulation (EPS) of muscle cells has previously been used as an in vitro exercise model. The present study aimed to establish an EPS protocol promoting the hypertrophy of human muscle cells, which represents a major physiological end-point to resistance exercise in humans. We hypothesized that adding a resting period after EPS would be crucial for the occurrence of the morphological change. Myoblasts obtained from human muscle biopsies (n = 5) were differentiated into multinucleated myotubes and exposed to 8 h of EPS consisting of 2 ms pulses at 12 V, with a frequency of 1 Hz. Myotube size was assessed using immunohistochemistry immediately, 4 and 8 h after completed EPS. Gene expression and phosphorylation status of selected markers of hypertrophy were assessed using RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. Release of the myokine interleukin-6 in culture medium was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We demonstrated a significant increase (31 ± 14%; P = 0.03) in the size of myotubes when EPS was followed by an 8 h resting period, but not immediately or 4 h after completion of EPS. The response was supported by downregulation (P = 0.04) of the gene expression of myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle mass, and an increase in phosphorylated mTOR (P = 0.03) and 4E-BP1 (P = 0.01), which are important factors in the cellular growth signalling cascade. The present work demonstrates that EPS is an in vitro exercise model promoting the hypertrophy of human muscle cells, recapitulating a major physiological end-point to resistance exercise in human skeletal muscle.
© 2017 The Authors. Experimental Physiology © 2017 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell growth; muscle contraction; myotube morphology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28861930     DOI: 10.1113/EP086581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0958-0670            Impact factor:   2.969


  10 in total

Review 1.  In vitro experimental models for examining the skeletal muscle cell biology of exercise: the possibilities, challenges and future developments.

Authors:  Steven Carter; Thomas P J Solomon
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  Electrical stimulation increases hypertrophy and metabolic flux in tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Alastair Khodabukus; Lauran Madden; Neel K Prabhu; Timothy R Koves; Christopher P Jackman; Deborah M Muoio; Nenad Bursac
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  In vitro skeletal muscle models for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Christina Y Sheng; Young Hoon Son; Jeongin Jang; Sung-Jin Park
Journal:  Biophys Rev (Melville)       Date:  2022-09-13

4.  Microphysiological system for studying contractile differences in young, active, and old, sedentary adult derived skeletal muscle cells.

Authors:  Shelby Giza; Jorge A Mojica-Santiago; Maddalena Parafati; Legrand K Malany; Don Platt; Christine E Schmidt; Paul M Coen; Siobhan Malany
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 11.005

5.  Characterizing Extracellular Vesicles and Particles Derived from Skeletal Muscle Myoblasts and Myotubes and the Effect of Acute Contractile Activity.

Authors:  Benjamin Bydak; Taiana M Pierdoná; Samira Seif; Karim Sidhom; Patience O Obi; Hagar I Labouta; Joseph W Gordon; Ayesha Saleem
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26

6.  Metformin blunts muscle hypertrophy in response to progressive resistance exercise training in older adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial: The MASTERS trial.

Authors:  R Grace Walton; Cory M Dungan; Douglas E Long; S Craig Tuggle; Kate Kosmac; Bailey D Peck; Heather M Bush; Alejandro G Villasante Tezanos; Gerald McGwin; Samuel T Windham; Fernando Ovalle; Marcas M Bamman; Philip A Kern; Charlotte A Peterson
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 11.005

7.  Response to Electrostimulation Is Impaired in Muscle Cells from Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Matthias Catteau; Emilie Passerieux; Léo Blervaque; Farés Gouzi; Bronia Ayoub; Maurice Hayot; Pascal Pomiès
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Measuring Exercise-Induced Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine Expression as a Molecular Tool to Optimize Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Abdelaziz Ghanemi; Mayumi Yoshioka; Jonny St-Amand
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Differential microRNA profiles of intramuscular and secreted extracellular vesicles in human tissue-engineered muscle.

Authors:  Christopher G Vann; Xin Zhang; Alastair Khodabukus; Melissa C Orenduff; Yu-Hsiu Chen; David L Corcoran; George A Truskey; Nenad Bursac; Virginia B Kraus
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Recycled algae-based carbon materials as electroconductive 3D printed skeletal muscle tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Selva Bilge; Emre Ergene; Ebru Talak; Seyda Gokyer; Yusuf Osman Donar; Ali Sınağ; Pinar Yilgor Huri
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.896

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.