Literature DB >> 28861370

Increased risk of recurrence associated with certain risk factors in breast cancer patients after DIEP-flap reconstruction and lipofilling-a matched cohort study with 200 patients.

Sonia Fertsch1, Mazen Hagouan1, Beatrix Munder1, Tino Schulz1, Alina Abu-Ghazaleh1, Julia Schaberick1, Peter Stambera1, Mohammed Aldeeri1, Christoph Andree1, Oliver Christian Thamm1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lipofilling is performed in breast cancer patients to optimize the aesthetic outcome following breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Despite its common usage worldwide, little is known about the interaction of the lipoaspirate and dormant cancer cells. Up to date, no risk factors that increase the risk for cancer recurrence have been established. This study aims to identify risk factors for lipofilling candidates after breast cancer and questions the oncological safety of lipofilling in lymph node positive disease.
METHODS: Matched retrospective cohort study: the disease-free survival (DFS) between 100 breast cancer patients undergoing a lipofilling after their DIEP-flap reconstruction and 100 matched control patients with no subsequent lipofilling was analyzed. Further, patients were subdivided according to risk factors, which were categorized as patient-dependent factors (PDFs) and tumor-dependent factors (TDFs). DFS and hazard ratios (HR) were compared to identify potential risk factors that may increase cancer recurrence.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 76.5 months from the mastectomy, and 31 months from the startpoint to the end of follow-up. Seven and eleven patients had recurrence in the lipofilling and control group, respectively, presenting with comparable DFS rates and an insignificant HR =0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-1.47, P=0.24. According to subgroup survival analysis, lipofilling increased the risk of recurrence in women with a positive nodal status (P=0.035) and a high-grade neoplasia (P=0.049).
CONCLUSIONS: No general increased recurrence risk was observed between the lipofilling and control group. The subgroup analysis identified high-grade neoplasia and positive nodal status to be a risk factor for cancer recurrence. Patients with a known node positive disease have an increased risk of occult micrometastases in their lymph nodes. Further studies are necessary to clarify whether dormant breast cancer cells in form of micrometastases in the lymph nodes can be reactivated by the factors secreted by adipose derived stem cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; dormancy; lipofilling; reconstruction; recurrence; risk factors

Year:  2017        PMID: 28861370      PMCID: PMC5566658          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2017.03.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  33 in total

1.  Current applications and safety of autologous fat grafts: a report of the ASPS fat graft task force.

Authors:  Karol A Gutowski
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Trends in autologous fat grafting to the breast: a national survey of the american society of plastic surgeons.

Authors:  Russell E Kling; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic; V Leroy Young; Keith M Hume; Catherine A Crotty; J Peter Rubin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Fat for breast: where are we?

Authors:  Scott L Spear
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  The safety of autologous fat transfer in breast cancer: lessons from stem cell biology.

Authors:  Robert A Pearl; Simon J Leedham; Marc D Pacifico
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Locoregional recurrence risk after lipofilling in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J Y Petit; E Botteri; V Lohsiriwat; M Rietjens; F De Lorenzi; C Garusi; F Rossetto; S Martella; A Manconi; F Bertolini; G Curigliano; P Veronesi; B Santillo; N Rotmensz
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Facial augmentation with structural fat grafting.

Authors:  Sydney R Coleman
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.017

7.  Rehabilitation of irradiated head and neck tissues by autologous fat transplantation.

Authors:  Bérengère Phulpin; Pierre Gangloff; Nguyen Tran; Pierre Bravetti; Jean-Louis Merlin; Gilles Dolivet
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  R A Saez; W L McGuire; G M Clark
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1989

Review 9.  Stem cells from adipose tissue and breast cancer: hype, risks and hope.

Authors:  F Bertolini; J-Y Petit; M G Kolonin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The perivascular niche regulates breast tumour dormancy.

Authors:  Cyrus M Ghajar; Héctor Peinado; Hidetoshi Mori; Irina R Matei; Kimberley J Evason; Hélène Brazier; Dena Almeida; Antonius Koller; Katherine A Hajjar; Didier Y R Stainier; Emily I Chen; David Lyden; Mina J Bissell
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 28.824

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Oncological safety of reconstruction with autologous fat grafting in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiale Sun; He Liang; Dongcai Lin; Bing Han; Tiran Zhang; Jidong Gao
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Oncological Safety of Autologous Fat Grafting in Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis Based on Matched Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Ming Li; Yao Shi; Qiuyue Li; Xin Guo; Xuefeng Han; Facheng Li
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Long-term Follow-up of Autologous Fat Transfer vs Conventional Breast Reconstruction and Association With Cancer Relapse in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Todor Krastev; Arjen van Turnhout; Eline Vriens; Luc Smits; René van der Hulst
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Meta-analysis of the oncological safety of autologous fat transfer after breast cancer.

Authors:  T K Krastev; S J Schop; J Hommes; A A Piatkowski; E M Heuts; R R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  The oncological safety of autologous fat grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Goncalves; Bruna Salani Mota; Bruno Sobreira-Lima; Marcos Desidério Ricci; José Maria Soares; Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Edmund Chada Baracat; José Roberto Filassi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  The prognosis outcomes of autologous fat transfer for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Daixiong Tian; Ying Chu; Ge Zhang; Dan Huang; Jialin Huang; Jin Zeng
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-07

7.  Comparison of survival outcomes of locally advanced breast cancer patients receiving post-mastectomy radiotherapy with and without immediate breast reconstruction: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  San-Gang Wu; Wen-Wen Zhang; Jia-Yuan Sun; Qin Lin; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 8.  Breast cancer recurrence after reconstruction: know thine enemy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Brett; Matthias M Aitzetmüller; Matthias A Sauter; Georg M Huemer; Hans-Günther Machens; Dominik Duscher
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-06-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.