Literature DB >> 28860179

Fewer REBOA complications with smaller devices and partial occlusion: evidence from a multicentre registry in Japan.

Yosuke Matsumura1, Junichi Matsumoto2, Hiroshi Kondo3, Koji Idoguchi4, Tokiya Ishida5, Yuri Kon6, Keisuke Tomita7, Kenichiro Ishida8, Tomoya Hirose9, Kensuke Umakoshi10, Tomohiro Funabiki11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) performed by emergency physicians has been gaining acceptance as a less invasive technique than resuscitative thoracotomy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate access-related complications and duration of occlusions during REBOA.
METHODS: Patients with haemorrhagic shock requiring REBOA, from 18 hospitals in Japan, included in the DIRECT-IABO Registry were studied. REBOA-related characteristics were compared between non-survivors and survivors at 24 hours. 24-Hour survivors were categorised into groups with small (≤8 Fr), large (≥9 Fr) or unusual sheaths (oversized or multiple) to assess the relationship between the sheath size and complications. Haemodynamic response, occlusion duration and outcomes were compared between groups with partial and complete REBOA.
RESULTS: Between August 2011 and December 2015, 142 adults undergoing REBOA were analysed. REBOA procedures were predominantly (94%) performed by emergency medicine (EM) physicians. The median duration of the small sheath (n=53) was 19 hours compared with 7.5 hours for the larger sheaths (P=0.025). Smaller sheaths were more likely to be removed using external manual compression (96% vs 45%, P<0.001). One case of a common femoral artery thrombus (large group) and two cases of amputation (unusual group) were identified. Partial REBOA was carried out in more cases (n=78) and resulted in a better haemodynamic response than complete REBOA (improvement in haemodynamics, 92% vs 70%, P=0.004; achievement of stability, 78% vs 51%, P=0.007) and allowed longer occlusion duration (median 58 vs 33 min, P=0.041). No statistically significant difference in 24-hour or 30-day survival was found between partial and complete REBOA.
CONCLUSION: In Japan, EM physicians undertake the majority of REBOA procedures. Smaller sheaths appear to have fewer complications despite relatively prolonged placement and require external compression on removal. Although REBOA is a rarely performed procedure, partial REBOA, which may extend the occlusion duration without a reduction in survival, is used more commonly in Japan. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  REBOA; arterial access; complication; hemorrhagic shock; partial occlusion; resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta; sheath

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28860179     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  24 in total

1.  Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and endovascular resuscitation and trauma management (EVTM): a paradigm shift regarding hemodynamic instability.

Authors:  Tal Hörer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Distal pressure monitoring and titration with percent balloon volume: feasible management of partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (P-REBOA).

Authors:  Yosuke Matsumura; Akiko Higashi; Yoshimitsu Izawa; Shuji Hishikawa; Hiroshi Kondo; Viktor Reva; Shigeto Oda; Junichi Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 3.  [Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta : Option for incompressible trunk bleeding?]

Authors:  J Knapp; M Bernhard; T Haltmeier; D Bieler; B Hossfeld; M Kulla
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  A survey of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) program implementation in Canadian trauma centres.

Authors:  Sean Hurley; Mete Erdogan; Jacinthe Lampron; Robert S Green
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 2.410

5.  Traumatic brain injury may worsen clinical outcomes after prolonged partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in severe hemorrhagic shock model.

Authors:  Aaron M Williams; Umar F Bhatti; Isabel S Dennahy; Nathan J Graham; Vahagn C Nikolian; Kiril Chtraklin; Panpan Chang; Jing Zhou; Ben E Biesterveld; Jonathan Eliason; Hasan B Alam
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 6.  Fetal and neonatal outcomes following maternal aortic balloon occlusion for hemorrhage in pregnancy: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Christina M Theodorou; Tanya N Rinderknecht; Eugenia Girda; Joseph M Galante; Rachel M Russo
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 7.  Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in combat casualties: The past, present, and future.

Authors:  Sarah C Stokes; Christina M Theodorou; Scott A Zakaluzny; Joseph J DuBose; Rachel M Russo
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.697

8.  Quantifying the need for pediatric REBOA: A gap analysis.

Authors:  Christina M Theodorou; A Francois Trappey; Carl A Beyer; Kaeli J Yamashiro; Shinjiro Hirose; Joseph M Galante; Alana L Beres; Jacob T Stephenson
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  A Life Saving Emergency Department Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) with Open Groin Technique.

Authors:  Panu Teeratakulpisarn; Phati Angkasith; Parichat Tanmit; Chaiyut Thanapaisal; Supatcha Prasertcharoensuk; Narongchai Wongkonkitsin
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-18

10.  Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta-Interest is widespread but need for training persists.

Authors:  Jason M Samuels; Kaiwen Sun; Ernest E Moore; Julia R Coleman; Charles J Fox; Mitchell J Cohen; Angela Sauaia; Jason N MacTaggart
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.697

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.