Literature DB >> 28859916

The effect of type of afferent feedback timed with motor imagery on the induction of cortical plasticity.

N Mrachacz-Kersting1, M Voigt2, A J T Stevenson2, S Aliakbaryhosseinabadi2, N Jiang3, K Dremstrup2, D Farina4.   

Abstract

A peripherally generated afferent volley that arrives at the peak negative (PN) phase during the movement related cortical potential (MRCP) induces significant plasticity at the cortical level in healthy individuals and chronic stroke patients. Transferring this type of associative brain-computer interface (BCI) intervention into the clinical setting requires that the proprioceptive input is comparable to the techniques implemented during the rehabilitation process. These consist mainly of functional electrical stimulation (FES) and passive movement induced by an actuated orthosis. In this study, we compared these two interventions (BCIFES and BCIpassive) where the afferent input was timed to arrive at the motor cortex during the PN of the MRCP. Twelve healthy participants attended two experimental sessions. They were asked to perform 30 dorsiflexion movements timed to a cue while continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) data were collected from FP1, Fz, FC1, FC2, C3, Cz, C4, CP1, CP2, and Pz, according to the standard international 10-20 system. MRCPs were extracted and the PN time calculated. Next, participants were asked to imagine the same movement 30 times while either FES (frequency: 20Hz, intensity: 8-35mAmp) or a passive ankle movement (amplitude and velocity matched to a normal gait cycle) was applied such that the first afferent inflow would coincide with the PN of the MRCP. The change in the output of the primary motor cortex (M1) was quantified by applying single transcranial magnetic stimuli to the area of M1 controlling the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle and measuring the motor evoked potential (MEP). Spinal changes were assessed pre and post by eliciting the TA stretch reflex. Both BCIFES and BCIpassive led to significant increases in the excitability of the cortical projections to TA (F(2,22)=4.44, p=0.024) without any concomitant changes at the spinal level. These effects were still present 30min after the cessation of both interventions. There was no significant main effect of intervention, F(1,11)=0.38, p=0.550, indicating that the changes in MEP occurred independently of the type of afferent inflow. An afferent volley generated from a passive movement or an electrical stimulus arrives at the somatosensory cortex at similar times. It is thus likely that the similar effects observed here are strictly due to the tight coupling in time between the afferent inflow and the PN of the MRCP. This provides further support to the associative nature of the proposed BCI system.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Afferent feedback; Brain-computer-interface; Cortical plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28859916     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  9 in total

Review 1.  Can Operant Conditioning of EMG-Evoked Responses Help to Target Corticospinal Plasticity for Improving Motor Function in People With Multiple Sclerosis?

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Thomas Sinkjær
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  Associative cued asynchronous BCI induces cortical plasticity in stroke patients.

Authors:  Muhammad Samran Navid; Usman Rashid; Imran Khan Niazi; Imran Amjad; Sharon Olsen; Heidi Haavik; Gemma Alder; Nitika Kumari; Nada Signal; Denise Taylor; Dario Farina; Mads Jochumsen
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 5.430

3.  Comparison of the Efficacy of a Real-Time and Offline Associative Brain-Computer-Interface.

Authors:  Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting; Susan Aliakbaryhosseinabadi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Investigation of Optimal Afferent Feedback Modality for Inducing Neural Plasticity with A Self-Paced Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Mads Jochumsen; Sylvain Cremoux; Lucien Robinault; Jimmy Lauber; Juan Carlos Arceo; Muhammad Samran Navid; Rasmus Wiberg Nedergaard; Usman Rashid; Heidi Haavik; Imran Khan Niazi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Motor imagery training induces changes in brain neural networks in stroke patients.

Authors:  Fang Li; Tong Zhang; Bing-Jie Li; Wei Zhang; Jun Zhao; Lu-Ping Song
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.135

6.  The effect of surface electromyography biofeedback on the activity of extensor and dorsiflexor muscles in elderly adults: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Ana Belén Gámez; Juan José Hernandez Morante; José Luis Martínez Gil; Francisco Esparza; Carlos Manuel Martínez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  To jump or not to jump - The Bereitschaftspotential required to jump into 192-meter abyss.

Authors:  M Nann; L G Cohen; L Deecke; S R Soekadar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Manual Feature Extraction Methods in Movement Related Cortical Potential Analysis.

Authors:  Gemma Alder; Nada Signal; Usman Rashid; Sharon Olsen; Imran Khan Niazi; Denise Taylor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Brain Functional Networks Study of Subacute Stroke Patients With Upper Limb Dysfunction After Comprehensive Rehabilitation Including BCI Training.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Zan Yue; Yunxiang Ge; Di Ma; Hang Yin; Hongliang Zhao; Gang Liu; Jing Wang; Weibei Dou; Yu Pan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.