Literature DB >> 28859858

Obesity and spinal loads; a combined MR imaging and subject-specific modeling investigation.

M H Akhavanfar1, H Kazemi1, A H Eskandari1, N Arjmand2.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have identified obesity asa possible risk factor for low back disorders. Biomechanical models can help test such hypothesis and shed light on the mechanism involved. A novel subject-specific musculoskeletal-modelling approach is introduced to estimate spinal loads during static activities in five healthy obese (BMI>30kg/m2) and five normal-weight (20<BMI<25kg/m2) individuals. Subjects underwent T1 through S1 MR imaging thereby measuring cross-sectional-area (CSA) and moment arms of trunk muscles together with mass and center of mass (CoM) of T1-L5 segments. MR-based subject-specific models estimated spinal loads using a kinematics/optimization-driven approach. Average CSAs of muscles, moment arms of abdominal muscles, mass and sagittal moment arm of CoM of T1-L5 segments were larger in obese individuals (p<0.05 except for the moment arm of CoMs) but moment arms of their back muscles were similar to those of normal-weight individuals (p>0.05). Heavier subjects did not necessarily have larger muscle moment arms (e.g., they were larger in 64kg (BMI=20.7kg/m2) subject than 78kg (BMI=24.6kg/m2) subject) or greater T1-L5 trunk weight (e.g., the 97kg (BMI=31kg/m2) subject had similar trunk weight as 109kg (BMI=33.3kg/m2) subject). Obese individuals had in average greater spinal loads than normal-weight ones but heavier subjects did not necessarily have greater spinal loads (117kg (BMI=40.0kg/m2) subject had rather similar L5-S1 compression as 105kg (BMI=34.7kg/m2) subject). Predicted L4-L5 intradiscal pressures for the normal-weight subjects ranged close to the measured values (R2=0.85-0.92). Obese individuals did not necessarily have greater IDPs than normal-weight ones.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR imaging; Musculoskeletal model; Obesity; Spine loads; Subject-specific

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28859858     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Increasing BMI increases lumbar intervertebral disc deformation following a treadmill walking stress test.

Authors:  James A Coppock; Stephanie T Danyluk; Zoë A Englander; Charles E Spritzer; Adam P Goode; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  How Does Obesity Influence the Risk of Vertebral Fracture? Findings From the UK Biobank Participants.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Raymond Yw Lee
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2020-03-26

3.  Reliability analyses and values of isometric shoulder flexion and trunk extension strengths stratified by body mass index.

Authors:  Lora A Cavuoto; Mojdeh Pajoutan; Ranjana K Mehta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Anatomy-Aware Inference of the 3D Standing Spine Posture from 2D Radiographs.

Authors:  Amirhossein Bayat; Danielle F Pace; Anjany Sekuboyina; Christian Payer; Darko Stern; Martin Urschler; Jan S Kirschke; Bjoern H Menze
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-02-11

5.  Validation of a Patient-Specific Musculoskeletal Model for Lumbar Load Estimation Generated by an Automated Pipeline From Whole Body CT.

Authors:  Tanja Lerchl; Malek El Husseini; Amirhossein Bayat; Anjany Sekuboyina; Luis Hermann; Kati Nispel; Thomas Baum; Maximilian T Löffler; Veit Senner; Jan S Kirschke
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.