Literature DB >> 28859766

No. 348-Joint SOGC-CCMG Guideline: Update on Prenatal Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy, Fetal Anomalies, and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.

Francois Audibert1, Isabelle De Bie2, Jo-Ann Johnson3, Nanette Okun4, R Douglas Wilson3, Christine Armour5, David Chitayat4, Raymond Kim4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the available prenatal screening options in light of the recent technical advances and to provide an update of previous guidelines in the field of prenatal screening. INTENDED USERS: Health care providers involved in prenatal screening, including general practitioners, obstetricians, midwives, maternal fetal medicine specialists, geneticists, and radiologists. TARGET POPULATION: All pregnant women receiving counselling and providing informed consent for prenatal screening. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library in and prior to March 2016 using an appropriate controlled vocabulary (prenatal diagnosis, amniocentesis, chorionic villi sampling, non-invasive prenatal screening) and key words (prenatal screening, prenatal genetic counselling). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies written in English and published from January 1985 to May 2016. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical speciality societies. GUIDELINE UPDATE: Evidence will be reviewed 5 years after publication to determine whether all or part of the guideline should be updated. However, if important new evidence is published prior to the 5-year cycle, the review process may be accelerated for a more rapid update of some recommendations.
Copyright © 2017 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prenatal screening; aneuploidy; cell-free DNA; congenital anomalies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28859766     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  16 in total

1.  Physician procedure volume and related adverse events after surgically induced abortion: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ning Liu; Simone N Vigod; M Michèle Farrugia; Marcelo L Urquia; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alexandra Cernat; Umair Majid; Forum Trivedi; Chanté De Freitas
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

3.  Left Superior Vena Cava in the Fetus: A Rarely Isolated Anomaly.

Authors:  Anne-Frédérique Minsart; Isabelle Boucoiran; Marie-Ange Delrue; François Audibert; Sylvia Abadir; Chantale Lapierre; Emmanuelle Lemyre; Marie-Josée Raboisson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 4.  Noninvasive Fetal RhD Blood Group Genotyping: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-11-02

5.  Association Between Serum Markers Used in the Routine Prenatal Screening with Pregnancy Outcomes: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zohreh Alizadeh-Dibazari; Zahra Alizadeh-Ghodsi; Azita Fathnezhad-Kazemi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-08-06

6.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies, and Microdeletions: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

7.  Obstetrical provider knowledge and attitudes towards cell-free DNA screening: results of a cross-sectional national survey.

Authors:  Wilson V Chan; Jo-Ann Johnson; R Douglas Wilson; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Canadian genetic healthcare professionals' attitudes towards discussing private pay options with patients.

Authors:  Vanessa Di Gioacchino; Sylvie Langlois; Alison M Elliott
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.183

9.  Factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada.

Authors:  Peri Abdullah; Christine Kurtz Landy; Hugh McCague; Alison Macpherson; Hala Tamim
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Prospective head-to-head comparison of accuracy of two sequencing platforms for screening for fetal aneuploidy by cell-free DNA: the PEGASUS study.

Authors:  François Rousseau; Sylvie Langlois; Jo-Ann Johnson; Jean Gekas; Emmanuel Bujold; François Audibert; Mark Walker; Sylvie Giroux; André Caron; Valérie Clément; Jonatan Blais; Tina MacLeod; Richard Moore; Julie Gauthier; Loubna Jouan; Alexandre Laporte; Ousmane Diallo; Jeremy Parker; Lucas Swanson; Yongjun Zhao; Yves Labelle; Yves Giguère; Jean-Claude Forest; Julian Little; Aly Karsan; Guy Rouleau
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.