Literature DB >> 28859388

Postoperative pain management after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

E Visser1, M Marsman2, P S N van Rossum1,3, E Cheong4, K Al-Naimi5, W A van Klei2, J P Ruurda1, R van Hillegersberg1.   

Abstract

Effective pain management after esophagectomy is essential for patient comfort, early recovery, low surgical morbidity, and short hospitalization. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the best pain management modality focusing on the balance between benefits and risks. Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched to identify all studies investigating different pain management modalities after esophagectomy in relation to primary outcomes (postoperative pain scores at 24 and 48 hours, technical failure, and opioid consumption), and secondary outcomes (pulmonary complications, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, urinary retention, and length of hospital stay). Ten studies investigating systemic, epidural, intrathecal, intrapleural and paravertebral analgesia involving 891 patients following esophagectomy were included. No significant differences were found in postoperative pain scores between systemic and epidural analgesia at 24 (mean difference (MD) 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.47-2.24) and 48 hours (MD 0.15; 95%CI -0.60-0.91), nor described for systemic and other regional analgesia. Also, no significant differences in pulmonary complication rates were identified between systemic and epidural analgesia (relative risk (RR) 1.69; 95%CI 0.86-3.29), or between systemic and paravertebral analgesia (RR 1.49; 95%CI 0.31-7.12). Technical failure ranged from 17% to 22% for epidural analgesia. Sample sizes were too small to draw inferences on opioid consumption, the risk of nausea and vomiting, hypotension, urinary retention, and length of hospital stay when comparing the different pain management modalities including systemic, epidural, intrathecal, intrapleural, and paravertebral analgesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis shows no differences in postoperative pain scores or pulmonary complications after esophagectomy between systemic and epidural analgesia, and between systemic and paravertebral analgesia. Further randomized controlled trails are warranted to determine the optimal pain management modality after esophagectomy.
© The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; esophagectomy; pain management; pain scores

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28859388     DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  11 in total

1.  The impact of epidural catheter insertion level on pain control after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Eisuke Booka; Yutaka Nakano; Koki Mihara; Shin Nishiya; Ryo Nishiyama; Shintaro Shibutani; Tomoyuki Sato; Tomohisa Egawa
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.230

2.  Patients with gastroenteric tumor after upper abdominal surgery were more likely to require rescue analgesia than lower abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Li; Fei Liu; Ting-Hua Wang; Quan-Yuan Chang; Liu-Lin Xiong; Yan-Jun Chen; Qi-Jun Li
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.376

3.  Paravertebral catheter analgesia for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Jan Willem van den Berg; Kate Tabrett; Edward Cheong
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  QOLEC2: a randomized controlled trial on nutritional and respiratory counseling after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Eleonora Pinto; Maria Teresa Nardi; Carlo Castoro; Marco Scarpa; Rita Marchi; Francesco Cavallin; Rita Alfieri; Luca Saadeh; Matteo Cagol; Ilaria Baldan; Elisabetta Saraceni; Matteo Parotto; Fabio Baratto; Cristina Caberlotto; Andrea Vianello
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Epidural analgesia and avoidance of blood transfusion are associated with reduced mortality in patients with postoperative pulmonary complications following thoracotomic esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 335 patients.

Authors:  Kai B Kaufmann; Wolfgang Baar; Torben Glatz; Jens Hoeppner; Hartmut Buerkle; Ulrich Goebel; Sebastian Heinrich
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 6.  Peri-operative approach to esophagectomy: a narrative review from the anesthesiological standpoint.

Authors:  Cristian Deana; Luigi Vetrugno; Elena Bignami; Flavio Bassi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.005

7.  Contrast-enhanced paravertebrogram to confirm paravertebral catheter position in elective thoracic surgery: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Fredrik Klevebro; Madhan Kumar Kuppusamy; Shiwei Han; Sara Nikravan; Joseph M Neal; Wyndam Strodtbeck; David L Coy; Daniel Warren; Michal Hubka; Neil Hanson; Donald E Low
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Paravertebral catheter versus EPidural analgesia in Minimally invasive Esophageal resectioN: a randomized controlled multicenter trial (PEPMEN trial).

Authors:  B F Kingma; W J Eshuis; E M de Groot; M L Feenstra; J P Ruurda; S S Gisbertz; W Ten Hoope; M Marsman; J Hermanides; M W Hollmann; C J Kalkman; M D P Luyer; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; H J Scholten; M Buise; M J van Det; E A Kouwenhoven; F van der Meer; G W J Frederix; E Cheong; K Al Naimi; M I van Berge Henegouwen; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Post-esophagectomy Symptomatic Dunbar Syndrome: A rare diagnosis of abdominal pain after surgery.

Authors:  Flavio Roberto Takeda; George Felipe Bezerra Darce; Lucas Faraco Sobrado; Luisa Leitão de Faria; Francisco Tustumi; Rubens Antonio Aissar Sallum; Manoel de Souza Rocha; Ulysses Ribeiro; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-03-07

10.  Outcomes of Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Transhiatal, McKeown or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Moniek H P Verstegen; Annelijn E Slaman; Bastiaan R Klarenbeek; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Camiel Rosman; Frans van Workum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.