Literature DB >> 28859362

Comparative study of radiotherapy plus erlotinib versus chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

T Song1, D Du2, X Zhang3, M Fang1, S Wu1.   

Abstract

This study compared the efficiency and safety of radiotherapy plus erlotinib with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) based on paclitaxel plus cisplatin in elderly esophageal cancer patients. The eligible patients were retrospectively enrolled at Wenzhou Medical University cancer center from January 2005 to December 2011. Propensity score matching generated a matched cohort (1:1) composed from radiotherapy plus erlotinib and CCRT groups. The efficiency and safety were compared between two groups. Multivariable analysis was used to identify significant prognostic factors. Thirty-four patients treated with radiotherapy plus erlotinib were matched with patients who received CCRT. Radiotherapy plus erlotinib group showed better treatment compliance compared with the CCRT group (91.2% vs. 67.6%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.202, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.051-0.809; P = .016). No significant overall response rate differences were found between the two groups (88.2% vs. 79.4%, HR 0.514, 95% CI 0.135-1.952; P = .323). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 23.5% vs. 19.2% for patients treated with CCRT or radiotherapy plus erlotinib (HR 1.008, 95% CI 0.574-1.768; P = .979). The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 16.8% versus 17.1% for patients treated with CCRT or radiotherapy plus erlotinib, respectively (HR 0.978, 95% CI 0.576-1.662; P = .934). The rate of severe hematologic toxicities in the CCRT group was significantly higher than that in the radiotherapy plus erlotinib group (HR 4.306, 95% CI 1.066-17.389; P = .031). Late toxicities were similar between radiotherapy plus erlotinib group and the CCRT group. Multivariate analysis showed that T stage (HR 1.730, 95% CI 1.062-2.816; P = .028), M stage (HR 2.859, 95% CI 1.407-5.811; P = .004), and complete response (HR 2.154, 95% CI 1.190-3.901; P = .011) were independent prognostic factors associated with OS. In conclusion, the present study suggested radiotherapy plus erlotinib should be a preferable modality compared with CCRT, with similar survival outcomes but better treatment compliance and less toxicities.
© The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemoradiotherapy; elderly; epidermal growth factor receptor; erlotinib; esophageal cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28859362     DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  6 in total

Review 1.  Safety and Tolerability of Metastasis-Directed Radiation Therapy in the Era of Evolving Systemic, Immune, and Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Guimond; Chiaojung Jillian Tsai; Ali Hosni; Grainne O'Kane; Jonathan Yang; Aisling Barry
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 2.  Esophageal Cancer in Elderly Patients, Current Treatment Options and Outcomes; A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Authors:  Styliani Mantziari; Hugo Teixeira Farinha; Vianney Bouygues; Jean-Charles Vignal; Yannick Deswysen; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer; Guillaume Piessen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Concurrent chemoradiation therapy tailored to the older adults with esophageal cancer: state of the art and the future.

Authors:  Tao Song; Min Fang; Shixiu Wu
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Effectiveness and Safety of Targeted Agents Combined With Chemoradiotherapy for the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Guo-Fei Wang; Hua Peng; Lei Zhang; Xiao-Yan Li; Qiao-Miao Zeng; Qian Li; Jian-Hui Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Survival Comparison Between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma for Radiotherapy-Treated Patients with Stage IIB-IVA Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Fangjie Chen; Long Chen; Yu Zhang; Lei Shi; Hong'en Xu; Tao Song
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  The Role of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Over Radiotherapy After R0 Resection for Stage II-III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tao Song; Peng Chen; Min Fang; Xuebang Zhang; Dexi Du; Shixiu Wu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.989

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.