| Literature DB >> 28859269 |
Jin-Wook Jang1,2, Chung-Young Lee1,2, Il-Hwan Kim3, Jun-Gu Choi4, Youn-Jeong Lee5, Seong-Su Yuk6, Ji-Ho Lee6, Chang-Seon Song6, Jae-Hong Kim1,2, Hyuk-Joon Kwon7,2.
Abstract
A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PR8)-derived recombinant viruses have been used for seasonal flu vaccines; however, they are insufficient for vaccines against some human-fatal H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses (HPAIV) due to low productivity. Additionally, the polymerase basic 2 (PB2) protein, an important mammalian-pathogenicity determinant, of PR8 possesses several mammalian-pathogenic mutations. We previously reported two avian PB2 genes (01310 and 0028) related to efficient replication in embryonated chicken eggs (ECEs) and nonpathogenicity in BALB/c mice. In this study, we generated PR8-derived H5N1 recombinant viruses harboring hemagglutinin (attenuated) and neuraminidase genes of a clade 2.3.2.1c H5N1 HPAIV (K10-483), as well as the 01310 or 0028 PB2 genes, and investigated their replication and immunogenicity. Compared with a control virus harboring six internal PR8 genes (rK10-483), the recombinant viruses possessing the 01310 and 0028 PB2 genes showed significantly higher replication efficiency in ECEs and higher antibody titers in chickens. In contrast to rK10-483, none of the viruses replicated in BALB/c mice, and all showed low titers in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Additionally, the recombinant viruses did not induce a neutralization antibody but elicited decreased protective immune responses against K10-483 in mice. Thus, the highly replicative and mammalian nonpathogenic recombinant H5N1 strains might be promising vaccine candidates against HPAI in poultry.Entities:
Keywords: influenza A virus H5N1 subtype; polymerase basic 2 gene; reverse genetics; vaccines; virulence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28859269 PMCID: PMC5583417 DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2017.18.S1.299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Sci ISSN: 1229-845X Impact factor: 1.672
Primers used in this study
Viral titers of the PR8-derived H5N1 recombinant viruses
ECE, embryonated chicken egg; MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney cell line; EID50, 50% egg infectious dose; TCID50, 50% tissue culture infectious dose. *The geometric mean of the log10 titer is shown with the SD. †Significant difference from the control (PR8) group value (p < 0.05).
Fig. 1Comparison of the virulence of H5N1 recombinant viruses in mice. Anesthetized BALB/c mice (5-week-old mice) were challenged with 106 EID50 of each virus (n = 5) or mock virus (n = 5; inoculated with the same volume of sterilized phosphate-buffered saline). Body weight (A) and mortality (B) were observed for 14 days. *Significant difference (p < 0.05) between PR8 and the other groups.
Replication of PR8-derived H5N1 recombinant influenza viruses in the lungs of BALB/c mice
DPI, days post-inoculation; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline. *BALB/c mice (5-week-old mice) were infected via the intranasal route with 106.0 EID50/50 µL of recombinant virus. †Lung tissues were sampled at 3 DPI and 6 DPI. ‡Viruses isolated from infected mice. §Viral titers from pooled lung tissues (log10 EID50/mL). The detection limit of the titer was < 0.5. ∥Significant difference from the control (PR8) group value (p < 0.05). ¶Significant difference from the control (PR8) group value (p < 0.05).
Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers in chickens vaccinated with inactivated H5N1 viruses
HI, hemagglutination inhibition; DPI, days post-inoculation. *Specific pathogen-free chickens (3-week-old chickens) were vaccinated via an intramuscular route with 1 mL of inactivated H5N1 viruses. †The geometric mean of the log2 titer is shown with the SD. ‡Significant difference from the other two groups (p < 0.05).
Virus neutralization titers in mice infected with recombinant viruses
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline. *BALB/c mice (5-week-old mice) were infected via an intranasal route with 106.0 EID50/50 µL of recombinant rK10-483 viruses, and blood samples were collected at 2 weeks post-inoculation. †The detection limit of the VN titer was < 10. ‡Significant difference from the control (PR8) group value (p < 0.05). §Significant difference from the control (PR8) and rK10-483 group (p < 0.05).
Fig. 2Comparison of the protective efficacy of recombinant H5N1 viruses against homologous highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses. BALB/c mice (5-week-old mice) were inoculated with each virus (n = 5) or the mock virus (n = 5). Anesthetized mice were then challenged with A/mandarin duck/Korea/K10-483/2010 (H5N1), whereas the negative-control (mock) mice were inoculated with the same volume of sterilized phosphate-buffered saline. Body weight (A) and mortality (B) were observed for 14 days. *Significant difference (p < 0.05) between the rK10-483 and other groups.