Literature DB >> 28859196

Strabismus Incidence in a Danish Population-Based Cohort of Children.

Tobias Torp-Pedersen1, Heather A Boyd2, Line Skotte2, Birgitte Haargaard1, Jan Wohlfahrt2, Jonathan M Holmes3, Mads Melbye2.   

Abstract

Importance: To our knowledge, there have been few population-based studies of strabismus incidence conducted. Our population-based study provides valuable data for health services planning and identifying research needs. Objective: To determine the incidence and age distribution of strabismus, overall and by subtype, among children 7 years or younger. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study was conducted with data from 96 842 children enrolled in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Main Outcomes and Measures: Age-specific incidence and cumulative incidence and median age at the detection of strabismus, overall and by subtype.
Results: The study cohort included 96 842 children born between 1996 and 2008 who are predominantly Caucasian and is composed of approximately 30% of births in Denmark, with a boy-girl ratio of 51:49. Overall, 1309 cases of strabismus were identified in the cohort. We found an overall cumulative strabismus incidence of 2.56% (95% CI, 2.42-2.69) at 7 years. The overall incidence was similar among boys and girls. Two hundred sixteen participants (16.5%) (95% CI, 14.5-18.6) had congenital esotropia, 177 (13.5%) (95% CI, 11.7-15.5) had fully accommodative esotropia, 252 (19.3%) (95% CI, 17.1-21.5) had partially accommodative esotropia, and 181 (13.8%) (95% CI, 12.0-15.8) had exotropia. The esotropia:exotropia ratio was 5.4:1 (95% CI, 3.4:1 to 7.5:1). Age-specific incidence curves for congenital esotropia, fully accommodative esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia, and all exotropia revealed interactions between strabismus subtype and age, suggesting that the different subtypes had different age-specific patterns of incidence (P < .001 for all comparisons between pairs of curves). The median age at detection for the 4 subtypes was 0, 32.0, 26.1, and 16.6 months, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In a national, population-based cohort study, we found a cumulative incidence of strabismus consistent with those reported in smaller European and American cohorts, but a somewhat higher esotropia:exotropia ratio than those that, to our knowledge, are typically reported by English and American studies. Patterns of incidence by age differed for different strabismus subtypes, indicating differences in age at onset and thereby implying differences in the underlying etiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28859196      PMCID: PMC5710488          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  19 in total

1.  Some results from a clinical-statistical survey on strabismus among copenhagen children.

Authors:  A D FRANDSEN
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1958

2.  Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias?

Authors:  Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Morten Frydenberg; Tine Brink Henriksen; Jorn Olsen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  A SAS-macro for estimation of the cumulative incidence using Poisson regression.

Authors:  Berit Lindum Waltoft
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Incidence and types of childhood hypertropia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Megha M Tollefson; Brian G Mohney; Nancy N Diehl; James P Burke
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Common forms of childhood esotropia.

Authors:  B G Mohney
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences.

Authors:  T F Andersen; M Madsen; J Jørgensen; L Mellemkjoer; J H Olsen
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1999-06

7.  Eye-hand coordination skills in children with and without amblyopia.

Authors:  Catherine M Suttle; Dean R Melmoth; Alison L Finlay; John J Sloper; Simon Grant
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Common forms of childhood exotropia.

Authors:  Brian G Mohney; Roland Keith Huffaker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Incidence and types of childhood esotropia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Amy E Greenberg; Brian G Mohney; Nancy N Diehl; James P Burke
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Risk factors for esotropia and exotropia.

Authors:  E Chew; N A Remaley; A Tamboli; J Zhao; M J Podgor; M Klebanoff
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Adult-onset nonparalytic, small-angle hypertropia.

Authors:  Saumya M Shah; Jennifer M Martinez-Thompson; Nancy N Diehl; Brian G Mohney
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  [Do children with strabismus receive ophthalmic treatment? : Results from the KiGGS (German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents) baseline survey (2003-2006)].

Authors:  Heike M Elflein; Laura Krause; Alexander Rommel; Michael S Urschitz; Norbert Pfeiffer; Alexander K Schuster
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Characterization of Intelligence in Children with Exotropia.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Zhonghao Wang; Tao Shen; Jianhua Yan; Chuanbo Xie; Xiuhong Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Knowledge and Attitude Toward Strabismus in Western Province, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mona S Khojah; Sarah Al-Ghamdi; Shahad Alaydarous; Jumanah J Homsi; Ahmed Alhasan; Sara Alsubaie; Nizar Alhibshi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-01-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.