Brian Suffoletto1, Joseph Yanta, Ryan Kurtz, Gerald Cochran, Antoine Douaihy, Tammy Chung. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA (BS, JY, RK); School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (GC); and Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (AD, TC).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a text message-based relapse prevention intervention (Preventing and Interrupting Early Relapse [PIER]1) is acceptable to treatment-seeking adults with opioid use disorder (OUD) after Emergency Department (ED) discharge using mixed-methods design. METHODS: Adults seeking care in an urban ED for OUD (n = 20; mean age 22; 55% female; 75% white race) completed a baseline survey, and were invited to enroll in PIER1, which was delivered in 7-day blocks, with the option to re-enroll at the end of each block, up to 4 blocks. PIER1 included a morning "push" message focused on positive thinking, adaptive coping feedback tailored to twice-daily assessments of craving severity and contextual correlates of craving, and end-of-day feedback on daily opioid use and goal commitment. Participants were asked to complete a follow-up phone interview after the first 7 days of PIER1. Transcripts were thematically coded. RESULTS: Seventeen out of 20 participants enrolled in PIER1. In the first 7 days, response rates to text-message assessments averaged 30%. Ten out of 17 participants re-enrolled after 7 days. Main themes from follow-up interviews (n = 9) included ease of use, social connection, and self-empowerment. Participants desired more personalized support and the ability to communicate through text messaging with another person about their struggles. Event-level data suggest that higher craving severity increased risk of opioid lapses. CONCLUSIONS: In this mixed-methods intervention development study, we found conflicting evidence supporting an automated text-message intervention providing relapse prevention support for treatment-seeking individuals with OUD discharged from the ED. Qualitative feedback suggests that PIER1 could be useful and acceptability enhanced through personalized human support.
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a text message-based relapse prevention intervention (Preventing and Interrupting Early Relapse [PIER]1) is acceptable to treatment-seeking adults with opioid use disorder (OUD) after Emergency Department (ED) discharge using mixed-methods design. METHODS: Adults seeking care in an urban ED for OUD (n = 20; mean age 22; 55% female; 75% white race) completed a baseline survey, and were invited to enroll in PIER1, which was delivered in 7-day blocks, with the option to re-enroll at the end of each block, up to 4 blocks. PIER1 included a morning "push" message focused on positive thinking, adaptive coping feedback tailored to twice-daily assessments of craving severity and contextual correlates of craving, and end-of-day feedback on daily opioid use and goal commitment. Participants were asked to complete a follow-up phone interview after the first 7 days of PIER1. Transcripts were thematically coded. RESULTS: Seventeen out of 20 participants enrolled in PIER1. In the first 7 days, response rates to text-message assessments averaged 30%. Ten out of 17 participants re-enrolled after 7 days. Main themes from follow-up interviews (n = 9) included ease of use, social connection, and self-empowerment. Participants desired more personalized support and the ability to communicate through text messaging with another person about their struggles. Event-level data suggest that higher craving severity increased risk of opioid lapses. CONCLUSIONS: In this mixed-methods intervention development study, we found conflicting evidence supporting an automated text-message intervention providing relapse prevention support for treatment-seeking individuals with OUD discharged from the ED. Qualitative feedback suggests that PIER1 could be useful and acceptability enhanced through personalized human support.
Authors: Ajay D Wasan; Edgar L Ross; Edward Michna; Lori Chibnik; Shelly F Greenfield; Roger D Weiss; Robert N Jamison Journal: J Pain Date: 2012-01-14 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Gail D'Onofrio; Patrick G O'Connor; Michael V Pantalon; Marek C Chawarski; Susan H Busch; Patricia H Owens; Steven L Bernstein; David A Fiellin Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Alexis M Roth; John Rossi; Jesse L Goldshear; Quan Truong; Richard F Armenta; Stephen E Lankenau; Richard S Garfein; Janie Simmons Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Stephanie Carreiro; Mark Newcomb; Rebecca Leach; Simon Ostrowski; Edwin D Boudreaux; Daniel Amante Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-08-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Hanneke Kip; Julia Keizer; Marcia C da Silva; Nienke Beerlage-de Jong; Nadine Köhle; Saskia M Kelders Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Kimberly D Williams; Claudine T Jurkovitz; Mia A Papas; Ann Kathryn Muther; Sharon L Anderson; Tammy L Anderson Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-08-30